CJEU 13 March 2014, aff. C‑38/13, Małgorzata Nierodzik
The Court found that national legislation cannot provide for different notice rules for fixed-term contracts of employment of more than six months (a fixed notice period of two weeks) and contracts of indefinite duration (notice ranging from two weeks to three months depending on the length of service of the worker concerned), where the two categories of workers are in comparable situations. (CJEU 13 March 2014, C-38/13, Małgorzata Nierodzik). In another case, it accepted a rule which allows universities to renew successive fixed-term contracts concluded with associate lecturers without any limit on the maximum duration or number of renewals of such contracts, insofar as such contracts are justified by an objective reason. (CJEU 13 March 2014, C-190/13, Márquez Samohano).
Date of publication
Available language
Country/countries concerned
Categories
Other Related Documents
CJEU, 15 December 2022, Case C-311/21, CM
On 15 December 2022, in a German case, the Court of Justice specified how a collective agreement allowing temporary agency workers to be paid less than employees of the user undertaking must provide for countervailing benefits, to respect ”the overall protection” to...
CJEU: 24 October 2024, Case C‑441/23, LM
CJEU, 4 October 2024, case C‑314/23, Air Nostrum
Other IR Share Services
We are called upon to devise training programmes based on needs expressed by a number of companies; we publish analyses and create tailor-made training activities for groups, works councils, trade unions and law firms. Our most recent projects are described here
IR Notes
Short description about this domain and the documents inside
IR Training
Short description about this domain and the documents inside
IR News
Short description about this domain and the documents inside
IR Club
Short description about this domain and the documents inside
Get in Touch
Follow us on Social Media