 |
| |
IR Notes 273 – 06 May 2026
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
A question for…
Jean-Philippe Lhernould, Law Professor at the University of Poitiers
In your opinion, following the
revision of the rules relating to coordination of social
security regimes (see Lead story), what are the main changes
that will affect workers, in concrete
terms? It’s
important to stress that the adoption of the text revising
Regulations 883/2004 and 987/2009 is, in itself, a victory for EU
law. After 10 years of deadlock, Member States and the European
Parliament have shown that it was possible to move forward. The
reforms concern the chapters covering family benefits, long-term
care and the entitlement of economically inactive persons to claim
benefits. Three other topics are worth highlighting, via a few
examples. The
“unemployment” chapter was at the root of a number of stalemate
situations, but these have been resolved through compromise. From
now on, unemployment benefits for people living close to a country’s
borders will be payable by the State where they were last employed,
subject to certain conditions (notably that they have worked for at
least 22 consecutive weeks in the other country, i.e. not their
country of residence). Luxembourg has been granted a transition
period lasting up to five years. In the case of Switzerland, another
country that employs large numbers of people who live close to its
borders, agreement will have to be reached on the joint committee
overseeing the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons (AFMP), so
that a similar solution can be found. A number of other
unemployment-related rules are being revised, notably in connection
with the “totalisation of periods” mechanism: the so-called
“one-day” insurance rule, which was being abused by migrants
returning to a country with the aim of claiming unemployment
benefits there, will be abolished. People may remember the case of
the French traders working in the City of London who, when a serious
financial crisis erupted, were repatriated from London to Paris,
where they carried on working for a few days before being made
redundant. The aim was to enable them to claim French unemployment
benefits, worth several thousand euros per month. One final example:
in future, unemployment benefits can be exported for a period of six
months (instead of the current three), which will make it easier to
look for a job in another Member State. Other significant changes are to be found in
the chapter on the law applicable in the social security field. They
include the following: the definition of “social security” posting
is being aligned with the definition used in labour law by the
“posted workers” directive; and A1 certificates, which are used by
workers to notify a posting to the host country and prove their
affiliation to another Member State’s social security scheme, will
have to be requested before departing to work in another country.
Business trips and missions lasting no longer than three days will
however be exempt from prior notification (other than in the
construction sector). Where there is doubt regarding an A1
certificate’s validity, the process of dialogue between the
competent authorities of two Member States is being refined. New
criteria, associated with identifying the place where a business has
its registered office, are appearing for the purpose of defining
multi-activity. However, their inclusion in the recitals of the
regulation affects their legal force. Lastly, it will be noted that measures to
combat fraud are now included in the regulations, which contain a
definition of fraud. A framework for effective data exchange between
Member States has been being created, and digitalisation is another
priority of the revised texts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Who we are?
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by
IR Share and its network of experts, and is
available in several European languages (English, French, German,
Italian, Spanish, Polish). It offers Europe-wide monitoring of
employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It is available
by subscription for 273 euros per year .
The team: This
issue was producaed by Inès
Bollet,
Victoria Fonseca, Ambre
Grenier-Boley, Frédéric Turlan
and Iris
Turlan. Find out more
about the IR Share team on our
website.
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95
or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
Legal notice.
Publisher: IR Share SARL – 5, Les Compères – 89520 Fontenoy, France –
Tel.: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 – share capital 1,500 euros – commercial
register (RCS Auxerre): 512 567 959. Managing editor: Frédéric Turlan.
Hosting: ALTEO by Damien Cornillet – Château – 89500
Villeneuve-sur-Yonne. CPPAP no.: 0626 Z 93933.
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow us on LinkedIn!
Why not connect to the IR Notes LinkedIn page, so that you can keep up with
developments in the issues we’re covering, between two editions?
You’re welcome to follow us! There are already 816 of you following
us!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lead
story
At last, a
step forward for freedom of movement for workers in the EU
On 22 April, representatives of the Council and Parliament reached a provisional
agreement on revising the rules on coordination of national social security systems,
as provided for by regulation nos.
883/2004 and 987/2009 (see Council
press
release). In so doing, they resolved a matter that has been under discussion
since 13 December 2016, when the European Commission first put forward its proposal.
This agreement was confirmed by the Council on 29 April, by a majority vote (21
Member States) but it has yet to be formally adopted by Parliament (see Council press
release). The somewhat abstruse terms in which the agreement is couched
conceal a key element of free movement for people within the EU, and especially
workers. The EU does not have powers to harmonise national social security
systems: its mission is to coordinate them in such a way that they do not
disadvantage EU citizens who wish to exercise their right to free movement. This
coordination is based on four principles: 1. citizens are covered by the
legislation of just one country at a time, so they only pay contributions in one
country; 2. citizens have
the same rights and obligations as the nationals of the country where they are
covered; 3. when citizens
claim a benefit, their previous periods of insurance, work or residence in other
countries are taken into account if necessary (the ‘totalisation
principle’); 4. citizens
entitled to a cash benefit from one country, may generally receive it even if they
are living in a different country (‘exportability principle’). Among other
things, the revision will amend the rules concerning payment of unemployment
benefits in cross-border situations; the conflict-of-laws rules that determine which
legislation is applicable to workers; and the rule concerning workers posted in the
context of performing services. It means that jobseekers who were “active” in a
Member State other than their country of residence for an uninterrupted period of 22
weeks, will be entitled to receive unemployment benefits from the country where they
were last employed (and no longer those of their country of residence), if they
satisfy the conditions stipulated by the country’s national legislation to be
entitled to such benefits. As regards posted workers, submitting prior
notification to the competent authorities is the rule. Exceptions apply to business
trips and short-term activities (i.e. those with a maximum duration of three
consecutive days of work within a period of 30 consecutive days). However, these
exceptions do not apply to the construction sector. When it comes to determining
which legislation is applicable to persons carrying out professional activities in
two or more Member States, the press release says that the revised text “provides
additional guidance on identifying the registered office or place of business of the
undertaking or employer in order to determine which country’s legislation should
apply to them”. This complex text will have to be analysed, to identify all of
its practical consequences. Nevertheless, it is already being welcomed by European
social partners, who, on 23 March this year, issued a joint
declaration calling on lawmakers to finally agree on a text. After the
provisional agreement was announced, BusinessEurope (see press
release) and the European Trade Union Confederation (see press
release) applauded the outcome, as did social partners in the construction
sector (see FIEC, EBC and EFBWW joint
press release).
|
1. European
Union
Social
update
European Works Councils : The
Expert Group set up by the European Commission to help Member States transpose the
new Directive
(EU) 2025/2450 on European Works Councils is due to submit its report this
summer. This report may constitute a useful point of reference when it comes to
transposing and interpreting the directive. It may also be taken into consideration
by the Court of Justice. In the meantime, the minutes of the Group’s meetings
already provide an insight into the problems raised by Member States and social
partners, and the responses given by the Commission. The minutes
of its first meeting, held on 12 February, discuss the form taken by applications to
set up an EWC: the Commission states that the directive does not exclude the
submission of written requests in digital format and that, in the case of a separate
submission of a request, the six-month period allowed for convening the special
negotiating body shall be triggered at the time a valid request is submitted, and
not by the date of receipt of the first letter. Requirements relating to
gender balance and transnational matters have also been discussed. The Commission
points out that “in order to be effective, consultation must refer to decisions that
have not yet been taken and whose effects have therefore not yet materialized”. The
minutes of subsequent meetings (on 23 March, 13 April) will be progressively
published online, on the Expert Group’s page.
|
Simplification : After being
pressed by the Council (see conclusions
of 19 March), which wants to strengthen the single market (“One Europe, One
Market”), on 28 April the European Commission unveiled “A Simpler, Clearer and
Better Enforced EU Rulebook”, set out in a communication
supplemented by two annexes (see press
release). It aims to create a more “effective and efficient regulatory
framework” by working on several themes, such as the principle of “simplicity by
design” in each legislative proposal, and “deep cleaning” of the current body of EU
law. The field of social affairs is not addressed directly, other than posting
of workers, which is mentioned in an annex to the communication where, among other
things, the Commission announces that it wants to strengthen the European Labour
Authority’s mandate and introduce an ELA electronic posting declaration
(“e-declaration”).
|
- Restructuring : On 30
April, the European Commission announced a proposal to mobilise 2 million euros
of aid from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), to help 803
workers who lost their jobs following the bankruptcy of Belgian car glass
manufacturer Soliver (see
press
release).
|
- Trainees : On 30 April, the
European Trade Union Confederation sent a letter
to EU Labour Ministers, urging them to pass an EU directive on regulation of
traineeships. Discussions between Council and Parliament negotiators on this
proposal for a directive were due to begin on 5 May.
|
2. Member
States
Spain
Health and safety in the workplace :
On 28 April, the Council of Ministers approved a reform of the
law on prevention of occupational risks (Ley de Prevención de Riesgos
Laborales). This important reform is part of the 2023-2025 Occupational
Risks Prevention Strategy, signed in February 2023 by the government, the trade
unions (CCOO and UGT) and the employers’ organisations (CEOE and
CEPYME). The reform takes account of the impact of
digitalisation and the transformations taking place in work organisation systems
(see press
release). It explicitly includes psychosocial risks, the effects of climate
change and the right to disconnect. For the first time, mental health is explicitly
recognised as a priority. Companies will have to plan specific measures for coping
with natural disasters and extreme climate phenomena. Workforce diversity also lies
at the heart of the reform: special attention is paid to gender equality, the
working conditions of pregnant workers, and workers’ age. The prevention aspect will
take account of the gender dimension: it must be possible for any work station to be
occupied by either men or women, which implies an obligation to take into account
their physical characteristics, their anthropometric measurements and other
biological characteristics likely to influence risk exposure. One year after
the law’s promulgation, it will be supplemented by a specific application regulation
on psychosocial risks, which will seek to promote healthy working environments and
to prevent serious situations, including suicidal behaviour, from arising.
|
France
Inclusion : On 24 April, the
polling and market research firm IFOP and L’autre cercle association
published the 2026 edition of the Barometer of inclusion of
LGBTQIA+ persons in the world of work (FR). Although the data gathered
demonstrates a rise in the visibility of LGBTQIA+ persons in the professional
sector, it also highlights a significant increase in harassment cases over the past
two years. In fact 36% of
employees questioned admit that they had been the victim of at least one LGBT-phobic
attack within their organisation, compared to 28% in 2024, when the previous
study was performed, while 37%
claim to have suffered discrimination at the hands of their management, compared to
25% in 2024. Faced with
this finding, the association is eager to alert companies to the importance of
prevention, with a view to protecting all employees, regardless of their gender or
orientation.
|
Sweden
Parental leave : The gender
equality index compiled by the civil servants’ trade union TCO (1.2 million members)
for 2025 reveals that the share of parental leave taken by men has continued to fall
for the second year running. This reversal of the trend towards parental equality is
unprecedented during the period since gender equality statistics were first compiled
in 2006. Women accounted for 68.5% of days of parental leave
and childcare leave taken in 2025 (compared to 68.3% in 2024), while men took
just 31.5%. “Since 2018,
progress towards greater equality in the take-up of these benefits has been
virtually at a standstill”, notes TCO (see press
release).
|
3.
Companies
European
Works Councils
EWC resources : A further
milestone has just been reached in the progress of the landmark legal dispute
between the EWC secretary of the US group Verizon and its European
management, relating to payment of expert consultants’ fees and training costs
incurred by the EWC. The Irish Supreme Court has granted the management’s
application for leave to appeal against the ruling of the High
Court, which ordered the group to pay the cost of certain items (see IR Notes
263). In its decision,
the Supreme Court suggests that, given the number of disputes currently in progress,
the means required to fund EWCs is an issue that merits consideration by the EU
Court of Justice. It emphasises that there appears to be “a significant number of
employees who are entitled to be clear on what the legislation does or does not
provide for”. Moreover, the Irish legislation to be interpreted “implements an
EU Directive which appears not to have been judicially considered or interpreted to
date. Its correct interpretation is a matter of general public importance, which may
require a reference to the CJEU.” It is therefore highly likely that the Irish
Supreme Court will refer a number of preliminary points of law to the Court of
Justice.
|
New agreement : On 6 September
2025, the management of the Hamelin
group, members of the special negotiating body and the French trade unions
CFE-CGC, CGT and FO signed a new
European Works Council agreement. This text replaces the one signed on 7
January 2013, which had previously overseen the creation and operation of this body.
The Hamelin group is specialised in the manufacture and marketing of school and
office products, and employs around 3,000 employees worldwide. The agreement
entered into force on 1 January this year. It covers all EU and EEA countries, plus
the United Kingdom and Switzerland, where the group has at least 10 employees. The
EWC is made up of nine members: three representatives for France, one for Poland and
one for the UK, while the other four seats are assigned to representatives covering
several countries grouped together in geographical zones. The EWC can be provided
with information about a project affecting a single country, “from the moment that a
proposed collective redundancy or workforce reduction involves at least 50 employees
at one or more establishments”. The confidentiality clause is particularly
restrictive: members are bound by a professional secrecy obligation and an
obligation to maintain discretion with regard to group employees who are not EWC
members, thereby limiting the EWC’s useful value.
|
4. Studies
and reports
Psychosocial risks : On 28
April, the ILO published a report
on psychosocial risks (see executive
summary) which, for the first time at global level, assesses the impact of
these risks, which are responsible for more than 840,000 deaths annually, caused by
cardiovascular disease and associated mental health problems. One of these risk
factors is long working hours (i.e. more than 48 hours per week, something that
affects 35% of workers at
global level). The ILO believes that another matter of major concern is
exposure to violence and harassment: 23% of workers worldwide say
they have fallen victim to at least one form of violence or harassment during their
working life. Psychological violence is the one most widely reported (18%). The ILO expresses regret
that just 18% of the 338
agreements concluded between 2000 and 2025 by the multinational companies registered
in its database deal explicitly with the issue of mental health or psychosocial
factors, in their occupational health and safety provisions. The ILO emphasis
that “the associated risks can often be reduced by improving work design,
organization and management. This includes reviewing workload, task allocation,
supervision and other elements of the working environment, while strengthening
workers’ capacity to recognize and respond to risks”.
|
|
|