 |
| |
IR Notes 7 – 9 April 2014
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
Who is IR Share?
IR Share is a provider that
shares information, documentation and expertise for HR managers and
employee representatives. The IR Share agency operates by way of online
publications, working groups, training devoted to relevant topics and a
network of experts.
The team This issue
was produced by: Francisco Gomez Abelleira, Jean-Claude Fillon, Sofia
Lampousaki, Sebastian Schulze-Marmeling and Frédéric Turlan. Find out
more about the IR
Share team on our website.
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on:
+33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 or
E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
|
|
|
|
| |
Interview
Dr. Thorsten Schulten, head of unit at the Institute of Economic and
Social Research (WSI)
What does the introduction of a
minimum wage represent for
Germany? For a long time, the social partners
believed that the question of a minimum wage could be regulated by
collective bargaining at industry level, without state intervention.
Since the 1990s, however, the system of collective bargaining has
become weaker. More and more employees are not covered by collective
agreements – collective bargaining coverage is no higher than 60% –
particularly in the service sector. This context has led the trade
unions to change their minds and to call for the establishment of a
minimum wage at national level. The trade unions have realised that
the absence of a minimum wage has allowed the emergence of entire
sectors practising a “low-wage” policy; this has contributed to a
continual pressure on salaries, which have not seen a significant
rise since the 1990s.
How many employees are currently
affected by low wages? At present, we believe that between 5 and 6
million workers are paid less than € 8.50. The minimum wage will
therefore benefit 1/5 of the labour force straight away. It is thus
very important that Germany adopts a minimum wage. This represents a
political success by the trade union movement, which has conducted a
campaign to this end for ten years and ultimately convinced the
majority of citizens and even conservative political parties like
the CDU, which have taken the plunge finding it unacceptable that
people should work for € 4 or € 5 an hour in Germany.
Are
you satisfied with the draft
law? We are critical of the fact that the minimum
wage level is not high enough – at € 8.50, it is lower than the
minimum wage in France – and in particular that it will not change
until 2018 under the terms of the new law. At present, the French
minimum wage represents approximately 60% of median earnings. At
€ 8.50, the German minimum wage represents 50% of median earnings,
and since the French minimum wage will continue to rise in the
coming three years, the gap will open up still further. As the
president of the Ver.di trade union has stated, a rapid rise to € 10
an hour is essential. The new law also contains uncertainty as to
how the minimum wage will be reviewed. To increase it, a commission
comprising members from both sides of industry must adopt a
recommendation, and the government must apply this recommendation
without being able to intervene. However, it is not yet very clear
what will happen if the commission does not arrive at an agreement,
since the majority of employers are opposed to the minimum
wage.
Are you also concerned about the
exemptions provided for by the new law?
Yes indeed, we are critical of the
exemptions envisaged by the bill, even if we congratulate the
government on resisting the intense lobbying by numerous sectors
wishing to obtain exemptions. The text provides that the minimum
wage will not be applicable to workers aged under 18 – which does
not appear fair to us if they are doing the same work as an adult –
or to the long-term unemployed (those who have been out of work for
more than one year) for six months after they have been hired; this
carries the risk of a substantial deadweight loss, where employers
will be able to recruit people who have been unemployed for a long
time only to dismiss them at the end of six months and hire some
more, without having to comply with the minimum wage. Having said
this, the overall impression is one of a great step forward and a
genuine break with the German model of autonomy of the social
partners. It is really a very good thing.
Is it good news for
Europe? It sends an extremely important political
message to the European Commission and the Troika comprising the
ECB, European Commission and IMF, which are exerting strong pressure
on countries in favour of wage moderation, a diminished minimum wage
and a weakening of the system of collective bargaining. German
success is not founded on the low-wage sectors or the growth in
insecurity among employees. The country could even be said to have
succeeded despite these two phenomena! Now, the overriding feeling
is that Germany has gone too far in terms of labour market
flexibility: that people must also be able to make a living from
their work and enjoy greater security, as well as better working
conditions. This is why the trade unions are calling for a new order
of labour (“Neue Ordnung der Arbeit”), in which the minimum wage
plays a central role.
Is there not a risk of massive job
losses in the low-wage sectors?
The most recent research into the
minimum wage clearly shows that its impact – if it has one – on jobs
is negligible. In Germany, numerous studies underscore that a
minimum wage in certain sectors has not had a negative effect on
employment. Businesses have a wide range of options for adapting to
a higher minimum wage. They can raise prices or increase
productivity. In certain areas, profits will be slightly lower. At
the end of the day, the minimum wage will create new purchasing
power, which will positively stimulate the economy.
|
|
|
|
| |
Diary
9 to 11
April Bremen
(Germany) Colloquium organised by the “Research Centre
for East European Studies” of the University of Bremen and its
partners on: “The Europeanization of Trade Unions in the Countries
of the Eastern Enlargement. Perspectives for Interest Representation
by Trade Unions and for Trade Union Solidarity within the EU”
11
April Manchester Middlesex
University is organising a seminar entitled “Work-life
balance, fairness and social justice in recession“.
14
April Bordeaux Seminar
organised by the Centre for Comparative Labour and Social Security Law
(COMPTRASEC – University of Bordeaux) on “Le droit du travail en face de
Jaibeol en Corée” (Labour law in the face of chaebol in Korea), by
Jeseong Park, and “Overcoming Marginalization: Informal workers and
their solidarity-based movement in India”, by Supriya Routh. Link to the
programme.
14 to 17
April Strasbourg Plenary
session of the European Parliament with the vote on the report on the Conditions
of entry and residence of third-country nationals in the framework
of an intra-corporate transfer.
28
April Brussels Conference
on working conditions, organised by the European Commission.
6
May Évry
(France) International colloquium on
“L’inspection du travail, l’entreprise et les droits des travailleurs”
(The labour inspectorate, the company and workers’ rights”, organised by
Centre de recherche Léon Duguit (Léon Duguit research centre),
Université d’Évry-val-d’Essonne. Link to the programme.
14 and 15
May Geneva Global
dialogue forum on employment relationships in the media and culture
sector, organised by the International Labour Organisation.
15 and 16 May Lyon Colloquium
organised by Erds-CERCRID and IETL (Université Lumière Lyon) on the
extent of flexibilities in labour law, with contributions in particular
by Sylvaine Laulom (“Les flexibilités du droit social européen” (The
flexibilities of European social law)) and Farida Khodri (“Les normes
sociales fondamentales : un rempart efficace aux flexibilités?”
(Fundamental social norms: an effective buffer to flexibilities?)). Link
to the programme.
20
May Créteil,
France Conference organised by RT 18
(Relations professionnelles/Professional relations) of the Association
française de sociologie (French Sociological Association) entitled “Syndicats
et nouveaux acteurs face aux défis des restructurations
multinationales” (The challenges of multinational restructuring
facing trade unions and new players). Contact:dkessel11@gmail.com
23
May Avignon Mediterranean
Seminar on labour law, organised by the French Labour Law Association
(AFDT) in conjunction with the Spanish and Italian labour law
associations. The topic is “religion in companies”. Link
to the programme.
26 to 28
May Copenhagen The Danish National
Research Centre for the Working Environment (NRCWE) is
organising the 3rd
International Wellbeing at Work conference.
12 and 13 June
Paris International
colloquium “Trajectoires
professionnelles et dispositifs publics en action” (Professional
trajectories and public programmes in action) organised by seven
research institutions (CEE, IDHE, Ires, Irisso, Lest, Lise and
Printemps).
20
June Brussels Employment
and Social Affairs Council.
|
|
|
|
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by IR
Share and its network of experts, and is available
in several European languages. It offers Europe-wide monitoring of
employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It is available by
subscription for 15 euros per month ; 150 euros per year (excluding
tax), via the IR Share
website. IR Share is a privately- owned, independent,
apolitical company whose aim is to inform and assist all players involved in
social dialogue within and outside Europe. It has been the correspondent
organisation for France and Luxembourg of the Dublin Foundation since 2009
and for Bulgaria since 2014.
|
|
|
Lead
story
Michelin
changes tack on European social dialogue
The management of the Michelin group (62,000 employees in Europe) and the negotiators
appointed by its European works council on 26 March signed a “European framework
agreement on social responsibility and development”*, at Valladolid, Spain. This is
the first time that the Michelin group has concluded a transnational agreement, and
it represents a revolution: 1. Long dominated by a paternalistic culture and hostile
towards trade unions, the group was found guilty of anti-union discrimination in
France on several occasions and did not establish a European works council until
1999. 2. The document’s content deviates from standard international framework
agreements thanks to protracted negotiations “for which the management found a way
of working with the staff representatives,” emphasised Cyrille Poughon (CFDT),
secretary of the European works council at Michelin. In the end, the agreement
reflects the “new” culture of the group and its ambitions in terms of industrial
relations; it contains specific commitments, such as that of making 50% of jobs
available to older workers and women. 3. The text is a framework agreement, based on
which the group’s social partners are going to initiate a cycle of transnational
negotiations on different subjects listed in the agreement from 2015 onwards. It
also paves the way for negotiation of an international framework agreement covering
non-EU employees with the IndustriAll Global Union trade union federation. No-one
could have imagined twenty years ago that the president of the group might say, as
Jean-Dominique Senard did at the signing of the agreement, that “a
successful company is a company which lives and breathes exemplary
industrial relations”. The social partners have thus successfully converted
a culture of confrontation and avoidance into a “constructive social dialogue”, and
in this transformation, the dialogue rooted within the European works council has
played its part. Hats off!
* The latter will be available on IR Share as soon as
we have received consent from the management and the European works
council.
|
1. European
Union
Legislation
- Public procurement: The
three directives reforming the rules for awarding concession and public
procurement contracts have been published in the Official Journal (OJEU,
28 Mars 2014, L 94). These are: 1. Directive
2014/23 of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts; 2. Directive
2014/24 of 26 February 2014 on public procurement; 3. Directive 2014/25 of 26
February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy,
transport and postal services. From a social perspective, these texts are
important because they allow those responsible for decisions on the award of
public contracts: 1. To exclude businesses which have been convicted of “child
labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings” and those which have
failed to meet their obligations relating to the payment of taxes or social
security contributions. 2. When awarding public contracts, no longer to base
their decision solely on the lowest price, but also on the “most economically
advantageous tender”, which is evaluated according to criteria including
qualitative, environmental and/or social aspects. Thus, “the qualification and
experience of the staff assigned to performing the contract in question” can be
considered “where the quality of the staff assigned can have a significant
impact on the level of performance of the contract”.
- Seasonal workers: Directive
2014/36 of 26 February 2014 establishing the conditions of entry and
residence of non-EU citizens coming to the EU for seasonal work has been
published in the Official Journal (OJEU,
28 March 2014, L 94). It determines the conditions under which people
from third countries seeking seasonal work are allowed to enter and stay in the
EU, and defines seasonal workers’ rights.
|
Social
update
- France invited to review its social
legislation: The European Commission on 28 March
addressed two reasoned opinions to France concerning doctors’ working hours and
the protection of pensions in the event of insolvency. In the first case, it
notes that “supplementary on-call periods and training hours at university are
not covered whereas Directive No. 2008/88 requires them to be considered as
working time”. In the second opinion, it considers that the legislation does not
sufficiently protect workers’ rights to an occupational pension if their
employer becomes insolvent, contrary to the requirements laid down in Directive
No 2008/94 on protecting employees in the event of insolvency (see European
Commission press
release).
- Ireland required to review its taxation of
termination payments: The European Commission on 28
March asked Ireland to amend its legislation on termination payments because its
discriminates against individuals who work in group companies in other Member
States. The Commission finds faults with how the tax relief on such payments is
calculated, stating that the present method does not take into account the
number of years of service in group companies in Member States other than
Ireland (see European Commission press
release).
|
Sectoral
social dialogue
- Railway sector: The
European social partners in the railway sector – CER (Communauté européenne du
rail) and ETF (European Transport Workers Federation) – on 11 March adopted joint
recommendations for identifying and preventing psychosocial risks (PSR)
in their industry. The signatories are looking to achieve a “cooperative
corporate culture” in the framework of “an overall risk assessment process”
founded if possible on a “joint approach”.
- Cleaning industry:
The European social partners have issued a joint position to the
European Commission as part of the second stage of consultation on undeclared
work.
- Extractive industry: The
European social partners have adopted a joint
declaration on the recommendations of the scientific committee on
occupational exposure limits at the workplace for NO2 and NO.
|
Case law
- Maritime transport and collective
action: The Advocate General of the European Court of
Justice on 1 April issued his conclusions
on a case concerning two collective actions (obstruction of operations to load
and unload a ship) taken by Swedish trade unions in a Swedish port against a
vessel flying the flag of a third country but belonging to a Norwegian company –
that is to say to a member country of the European Economic Area (EEA). The
Swedish court which referred the matter to the European Court of Justice
believes that the lawfulness of the trade union actions is decisive for the
outcome of the case and that the Court should judge whether Swedish law on trade
union actions is compatible with the rules under European Union law as regards
the freedom to provide services. However, it has not questioned the Court on
this point, believing no doubt that case law from the Laval un Partneri decision
is sufficiently clear (judgement of 18 December 2007, Laval un Partneri (C‑341/05).
The Advocate General, who believes that this is not a matter for the Court of
Justice, rules only on the application of Regulation No. 4055/86 of 22 December
1986, which applies the principle of the freedom to provide maritime transport
services between Member States and between Member States and third countries.
This document “does apply to a company established in an EEA member state, which
owns a ship flying the flag of a third country and carrying out maritime
transport services between the member states of the EEA, provided that this
company itself assumes responsibility for the operation of said ship”.
|
2. Member
States
Belgium
- Electronic meal vouchers:
The National Labour Council has ruled in favour of rolling out electronic meal
vouchers in an opinion
dated 25 March (in Flemish). This
wholesale and definitive switch will come into force on 1 January 2016.
|
France
- Posting of workers and low-cost
airlines: The criminal chamber of the French Court of
Appeal (Cour de cassation) on 11 March delivered two related judgements
concerning the social status of flight crews performing their duties out of
French airports on behalf of foreign budget airlines (Cass. crim. 11 March 2014,
Easyjet, No.
11-88420 and Vueling, No.
12-81461). The Court rejected the appeals by the two companies convicted
on appeal of undeclared working and non-affiliation under French social security
legislation. It did not apply the case law of the European Court of Justice on
the evidentiary value of E 101 certificates as long as they have not been
withdrawn or amended by the issuing institution. The two airlines can still
bring an action before the European Commission which could then lead to
infringement proceedings against France.
|
Germany
- Draft law on a minimum
wage: On 2 April the government adopted a bill
“to strengthen tariff autonomy” which introduces a minimum wage into
German law. The minimum hourly rate has been set at € 8.50 and will enter force
on 1 January 2015.
|
Greece
- Interprofessional agreement for
2014: The social partners at a national level – the GSEE
trade union confederation and the SEV, ESEE, GSEBEE and SETE employers’
organisations – on 26 March signed a new national collective interprofessional
agreement (EGSSE) for the entire private sector (text
in Greek) which will apply retroactively from 1 January. With this new
agreement, the social partners are asserting their decision to keep alive
collective bargaining and to restore the role of the EGSSE – which was called
into question by 2012 legislation adopted in the framework of the memorandum of
understanding negotiated with the ECB, the European Commission and the IMF. The
signatories intend to undertake measures aimed at reducing unemployment and
combating undeclared work; to conclude a programme agreement at a national level
geared to the economic and social reconstruction of the country; to establish
mutual cooperation based on the following subjects: jobs, education, training;
social protection; competitiveness ; entrepreneurship and innovation; to
conclude a related partnership proposal with the public employment service in
order to take concerted action to benefit young people, and finally, to extend
recourse to parental leave for fathers.
|
Spain
- Lowering of social security
contributions: Royal Decree
3/2014, which sets employers’ social security contributions at € 100 for
the first two years after taking on an employee on a permanent contract, has
been published. The payment is reduced to € 50 in the case of part-time
contracts. In addition, in businesses with fewer than 10 employees, the social
security contributions paid by the employer will be cut by 50 % in the third
year.
|
United
Kingdom
- More women in the
boardroom: A recent report
expresses satisfaction with the actions taken since 2010 to increase the number
of women employed by companies at senior management level. As of 1 March 2013,
women accounted for 17.3% of board members in undertakings listed on the FTSE
100 index of the top 100 companies and 13.2 % of board directors in those listed
on the FTSE 250 index, compared to 12.5% and 7.8% respectively in February 2011
(2011
report); this is an increase of nearly 40 %. Furthermore, women have
secured 34% of all FTSE 100 and 36% of FTSE 250 board appointments since 1 March
2012.
|
3.
Companies
European
works councils
- Air liquide: The
management of the Air liquide group and the members of the European works
council established by the agreement
of 16 May 2000, on 26 March concluded an amendment
(in French) in the context of the revised 2009 directive. The agreement covers
the principal points of the directive (definition of information and
consultation, linking with the national level, adaptation clause, etc.), while
at the same time strictly maintaining the EWC’s remit to deal with issues
affecting the group as a whole or at least two subsidiaries in two Member
States. The amendment establishes an EWC bureau with five members, of different
nationalities, which can be consulted directly in particular when the economic
consequences and repercussions in terms of jobs “are on a limited scale compared
to the group’s activities in Europe”. Consultation of the extended bureau,
including the representatives of the countries concerned, is provided for if the
consequences “are significant, but affect only a limited number of countries”.
- Deutsche Bahn: The
European works council of the German railway company Deutsche Bahn on 6 March
complained that it had been “snubbed” by the company’s general management during
the council meeting held on 16 February in Berlin (see press
release, in German). The EWC felt that the management had not complied
with the information and consultation procedure in connection with a proposal to
create a shared service centre for the company’s European accounting personnel.
|
European
Companies (Societas Europaea – SE)
- SAP: The German group SAP,
a world leader in business applications, on 21 March concluded an agreement with
a special negotiating body on worker involvement when SAP AG is converted to
become a European Company (SE). The agreement includes a section on the SE works
council, which will replace the European works council, and another on employee
representation on the supervisory board. For a period of one year the present
members of the supervisory board, all of whom are German, will remain in post,
but will be joined by one representative each for France and Slovenia, who are
currently members of the EWC. Thereafter, an election will be held in each
country. As for the SE works council, it will meet 4 times a year instead of
once in the case of the EWC. The members will benefit from the same protection
as that provided to the German representatives. Excluding Germany (20,000
employees) which will receive 7 seats, all other countries will have just one
representative, be they France with the second-biggest workforce (2,000
employees), or Estonia (only 1).
|
Trade
unionism
- Coca-Cola: The trade union
coordination group
initiated by the Effat European trade union federation met on 20 and 21 March in
Madrid to strengthen cooperation between the unions present at Coca-Cola and to
oppose the restructuring conducted in Spain. A joint European manifesto for a
“sustainable system of industrial relations” at Coca-Cola was adopted.
|
Transnational agreement
- Banco Itaù: The private
Brazilian bank Banco Itaù (80,000 employees), based almost exclusively in South
America, and the UNI Global Union international trade union federation on 26
March signed a global framework agreement (see press
release).
|
Collective
dispute
- Pilots’ strike at
Lufthansa: The Cockpit pilots’ union called out its
5,400 members who work for Lufthansa on strike for three days from 2 to 4 April.
Cockpit gave its assurance that the strike would end before the Easter holiday
period. The airline cancelled 3,800 flights involving nearly 500,000 passengers,
and it believes that the strike will cost it € 50 million. This collective
action is the result of a restructuring plan which, among other things, calls
into question a rule allowing pilots to retire at 55. At present, the company
pays them up to 60% of their final salary until they reach the statutory
retirement age. Lufthansa claims the withdrawal of this benefit is necessary
because of increased global competition. The trade union insists that this
measure does not involve additional costs since it allows young pilots to be
hired who are paid less. Reacting to the strike, a representative of the
Christian Democratic CDU party (a partner in the present coalition government)
criticised the fact that the economy was “being blackmailed” by a small group of
employees, and called for the right to strike to be reformed. The Labour
Minister, Andrea Nahles (of the Social Democratic SPD party), replied that the
question of any such reform was not on the agenda.
|
4. Studies
and reports
- Pattern of labour costs:
According to Eurostat, average hourly labour costs in the whole economy were
estimated to be € 23.70 in the European Union and € 28.40 in the euro area in
2013 (see Eurostat press
release).
- Unemployment:
The unemployment rate in the EU continues on its slow decline, with a
figure of 10.6% in February 2014, which was down on the January 2014 rate of
10.7%. In the euro area, the unemployment rate is 11.9%, unchanged since October
2013 (see Eurostat press
release).
- Impact of the crisis on working
conditions: The European Foundation for
the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) on 3 April
published a study on the Impact
of the crisis on industrial relations and working conditions in Europe.
The report particularly highlights an accelerated trend towards decentralisation
in collective bargaining, an increase in the scope for derogation from
higher-level agreements, the reduction in extension procedures and the abolition
of continuation mechanisms for collective agreements upon expiry. Another novel
aspect is the identification of new forms of social movements, such as the
“Indignados” protests or the 15 May Movement in Spain and other types of action
in Portugal, Slovenia and Greece.
- European Companies (SE):
The European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) has compiled an overview
(in English) of SE foundations in Europe. If the absolute number of SE
foundations is tending to fall as consulting firms in the Czech Republic, which
have created around one-hundred SEs in recent years, are making less use of this
form, never before have their been so many announcements of planned conversions
to an SE, such as Airbus Group, Christian Dior, Schneider Electric and LVMH Moët
Hennessy Louis Vuitton. The document also summarises employee involvement at
management and supervisory board level.
|
The Laval un
Partneri case
On 18 December 2007, the European Court of Justice delivered a judgement in a case
concerning collective action taken by a Swedish building workers’ trade union to
compel a Latvian company, which had posted workers to a Swedish construction site,
to sign the collective agreement in force in the sector so that the Latvian workers
would be paid at the same rate as Swedish workers, thus avoiding any social dumping.
The Court recognised that the right to strike was a fundamental right of the
European Union, which was immediately applauded by the trade union movement.
However, a little further on, the judgement asserted that the exercise of this right
is not such as “to render Community law inapplicable to such action”: it must be
reconciled with other fundamental rights, such as the freedom of establishment or
the free movement of services. This position caused outrage among the trade unions.
See the European
Industrial Relations Dictionary (in English) for further details.
|
|
|