|
| |
IR Notes 83 – 11 October 2017
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
Who we are?
IR
Share is a provider that shares information,
documentation and expertise for HR managers and employee
representatives. The IR Share agency operates by way of online
publications, working groups, training devoted to relevant topics and a
network of experts.
The team
This issue was produced by Frédéric Turlan. Find out more
about the IR
Share team on our website
Subscribe to IR
Notes Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 or
E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
|
|
|
 |
| |
Interview
Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Quaestor, MEP (PPE group)
What are the issues involved in the
vote on the draft report that you’re defending with your
colleague Agnes Jongerius on the revision of the directive on
the posting of workers which will take place at the meeting of
the European Parliament’s Committee on Employment and Social
Affairs on 16 October? The aim of this legislation is to
consolidate the European Union as an internal market in which we
need to ensure first of all that there is free movement of services
and secondly that workers are protected. It’s extremely important to
prevent Europe from being built upon social dumping, but it’s just
as important for businesses to be able to develop on an equitable
basis and under conditions of fair competition. We cannot develop
Europe if we don’t keep the scales balanced by trying to achieve an
equilibrium between protecting employees and protecting businesses.
As a Rapporteur, I have to seek a balance of this kind, as well as a
balance between the demands of the countries of Western Europe and
those of Eastern Europe, or between Europe-wide intervention and
respect for national jurisdiction. It’s all about putting together
as large a majority as possible for this text, so that we can then
obtain a clear, strong mandate for negotiation in order to finalise
this legislation in the final phase which involves discussion with
the representatives of the Council – in other words the 28 Member
States.
What crucial steps will you be
standing up for when you speak to the representatives of the
Member States as part of the final negotiation with the
Council? The
one thing that’s not negotiable is the right to be paid – that’s
untouchable. Posted employees must be paid the minimum salary in the
host country including any relevant allowances, for instance the
meal allowance, the cold weather allowance or the thirteenth month.
In addition to this, the pay that’s arrived at in this way must not
then be slashed by the employer deducting costs such as
accommodation, transport and meal costs. Finally, the cost of living
in the host country must be taken into account when calculating
these costs – for instance a Bulgarian employee sent to Germany must
be paid enough to be able to have a meal in Germany rather than an
allowance amounting to the price of a sandwich in Bulgaria.
Will the collective agreements be
binding upon posted workers? They already do apply to posted workers.
Although these are universally applicable collective agreements
which are binding upon all workers and all companies operating in a
particular sector, we’re also adding the national or even regional
collective agreements which must also be adhered to, provided that a
Member State decides to do this and publishes the text on an online
information platform in order to inform the companies posting
workers. If a Member State does not publish, companies can’t be
penalised. The aim is to ensure that a posted employee’s payslip is
exactly the same as a domestic employee’s. It should include the
same details, which thus helps to implement the concept of “equal
pay for equal work in the same place” put forward by the President
of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker. We won’t be
building Europe on social dumping and unfair competition.
But this principle doesn’t mean
that there won’t still be a distortion of competition caused by
Member States’ different social protection costs, does
it? It’s true
that there are differences in social protection costs between Member
States which have an impact on the cost of labour, but this question
will be dealt with as part of the work which is currently underway.
It’s being carried out in the Parliament by the French MEP Guillaume
Balas (S&D), and it deals with the revision of the regulation on
the coordination of social security systems.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| |
Top tip!
How to obtain a document on IR Share?
When you click on a link in IR Notes, you are often directed to the IR
Share website so you can download a document. However, in most cases you
have to identify yourself. To do so, you need an account on the website.
To create an account, go to this page.
You will then be emailed a user name and password.
|
|
|
 |
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and its network
of experts, and is available in several European languages. It offers
Europe-wide monitoring of employment law, labour relations and employment
policy. It is available by subscription for 15 euros per month (excluding
tax), via the IR Share
website. IR Share is a privately- owned, independent, apolitical company
whose aim is to inform and assist all players involved in social dialogue
within and outside Europe. It has been the correspondent organisation for
France and Luxembourg of the Dublin Foundation since 2009 and for Bulgaria
since 2014.
|
|
|
Lead
story
The European
Parliament is due to rule on the revision of the Posting Directive
On 16 October the European Parliament’s Committee on Employment and Social Affairs is
due to rule on the report on the revision of the directive on the posting of workers
drawn up by two of its most influential members, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier (PPE,
France) and Agnes Jongerius (S&D, Netherlands). A few days later, on
23rd October, it will be the turn of the heads of state and of government
to rule on the proposed revision, before the parliamentary report, which has been
voted on in committee, is put to the vote before the plenary assembly of the
Parliament by the end of the year. The two Rapporteurs have done everything in their
power to obtain as large a majority as possible on a piece of legislation which has
deeply divided Europeans, with a fault line between the Eastern countries from which
most posted workers are sent, and the host countries in the West. The main points
put forward by the report are as follows: 1/ Extension of the legal basis for the
directive, which is currently the article on the freedom to provide services within
the EU, to cover the articles in the treaty on social policy and working conditions
(articles 151 and 153 of the TFUE) “in order for this legislation to have two feet
upon which to stand: the freedom to provide services and the protection of workers”.
2/ A reminder that the directive introduces minimums thresholds to be adhered to for
the protection of workers and that it must not be considered as setting any maximum
thresholds. It must also point out that it cannot affect the exercising of the
European Union’s fundamental rights. 3/ It is pointed out that posted workers must
receive pay which is at least equal to the minimum salary applicable in the host
country plus any compulsory supplements (see interview). 4/ It is pointed out that
any posting-related transport, accommodation and meal costs may not be deducted from
the pay. 5/ The Member States are allowed to apply their own regional and
sector-specific collective agreements to posted workers (and not only the generally
applicable agreements) provided that these texts are clearly published on a single
national website setting out the rights in the host country which must be adhered
to, especially in terms of pay. 6/ The principle of equal treatment between
temporary posted workers and local temporary workers is applied, whilst at the same
time reducing the abuse of the posting in cascade of temporary staff. The vote which
will take place in committee on 16 October will be a good indication of whether the
revision will be supported by a large majority of the Parliament, including in terms
of nationalities and, if so, the Parliament’s negotiators will have a stronger hand
when it comes to forcing the 28 Member States into a compromise.
|
1. European
Union
Legislative
proposal
Revision of European antidumping
legislation: According to an informal agreement on the
revision of the antidumping legislation concluded between the Parliament and the
Council on 3 October, EU trade defence legislation is expected to take both
environmental and international employment standards on board. MEPs stressed that
“all parties involved, particularly trade unions, may give input to decisions on
trade defence measures”. The legislation now needs to be formally passed by both
institutions (see press
release).
- A European framework to boost
apprenticeships: On 5 October the European Commission
adopted a proposal
for a recommendation on a European Framework for Quality and Effective
Apprenticeships. This initiative, which takes the form of a
recommendation made by the Council, invites Member States to take fourteen
qualitative criteria on board in order to boost apprenticeships. These include
giving apprentices written contracts, ensuring that they are entitled to social
protection and that they are either paid or given a compensation (see press
release).
|
Social
update
- MEPs call for an EU-wide minimum
income: In a resolution adopted by a large majority on
28 September, the European Parliament’s Committee on Employment and Social
Affairs is calling for the introduction of a minimum income scheme in all Member
States with the aim of combating the risk of poverty and exclusion which affects
119 million European citizens (25% of the total EU population) (see press
release).
- Intervention by the Adjustment Fund in
Italy: On 26 September the European Commission proposed
that Italy should be provided with a grant of 3.3 million euros from the
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in order to help 1,610 former employees
of Almaviva Contact, a call centre, to find new jobs (see press
release).
- Protection for
whistleblowers: The European Parliament’s Legal Affairs
Committee passed a resolution calling for European rules designed to provide
whistleblowers with better protection and support by a large majority on 2
October (see press
release).
- Working conditions at low-cost airlines:
In a debate about mass cancellations of flights by Ryanair
held at the European Parliament on 4 October, a number of MEPs stressed that
working conditions at low-cost air carriers ought to be investigated by the
Commission. These MEPs feel that competitiveness must not come at the expense of
workers’ rights and that poor working conditions can also lead to safety and
security problems. The European Commissioner, Violeta Bulc, promised to launch a
study on social conditions and mobile workers’ rights in aviation next year (see
press
release).
|
European
social dialogue
Responses to the consultation on the revision
of the “carcinogens” directive: The European social partners
sent their responses to the first
consultation phase, which the European Commission launched in July, on a
fresh series of revisions of directive 2004/37 of 29 April 2004 on the protection of
workers from risks relating to occupational exposure to carcinogens or mutagens. The
employers’ organisation BusinessEurope
noted the Commission’s determination to continue with the revision work, whereas the
European
Trade Union Confederation communicated its requirements in terms of method
(setting an exposure standard which must not be exceeded and a more protective
standard to be attained gradually) and is calling for the scope of the directive to
be extended to cover reprotoxic agents.
|
2. Member
States
United
Kingdom
- A joint statement by the social partners
about Brexit: The employers’ organisation, the CBI and
the British Trades Union Congress (TUC) issued a joint
statement on 28 September – something which rarely happens in the
British industrial relations system – demanding that both the British government
and the EU negotiators offer guarantees to expatriate citizens affected by
Brexit “within weeks”.
|
3.
Companies
European
works councils
Essity: On 31 May Essity, a
Swedish group (with 48,000 employees) specialising in the production and marketing
of personal hygiene, paper-based hygiene and health products, set up a group-wide
European works council made up of two subcommittees, covering the “Tissue” and
“Personal Care” business areas respectively (this agreement is available on the
European Trade Union Institute website). The Essity group’s European works
council is made up of each of the subcommittees’ two select committees. The
agreement specifies that the working language is English. The aim is for all members
to be able to communicate in English within two years from the setting up of the
committee. The parties give a commitment that candidates for seats on the European
works council agree that they will get ready to learn English. According to the
agreement, the management undertakes to fund English courses which can go as far as
spending five weeks in the United Kingdom.
- Kostal: On 26 June the
management of Kostal – a German family-owned group (with 17,075 employees)
specialising in electronics – concluded an agreement to set up a European works
council (available on the European
Trade Union Institute website). The European works council must be
consulted before – or at the same time – as the national employee representative
bodies. It is specified that if a subsidiary intends to implement any measures
before the European works council has been informed and consulted, as required,
then the council is entitled to appeal to the central management to carry out
mediation. The management shall ensure that any such measures will not be
implemented prior to the completion of the information and consultation
procedure set out in the agreement on the European works council.
|
Transnational agreements
ASOS: On 3 October the
management of ASOS, a
British online fashion retailer, signed a Global Framework Agreement with the
international trade union federation IndustriALL Global Union with the aim of
improving the application of international employment standards throughout the ASOS
global supply chain, which is made up of more than 600 Tier 1 suppliers (see
IndustriALL press
release).
- H&M: As had been set
out in the Global
Framework Agreement which the Swedish textile group H&M signed with
the IndustriALL international trade union federation, the “National Monitoring
Committees” set up in five countries (Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Myanmar
and Turkey), met in Bangkok on 1 and 2 October. These Committees are made up of
trade unionists at the group’s suppliers and H&M representatives, and they
draw up both short and long-term action plans aiming to ensure that suppliers
implement the Global Framework Agreement (see press
release).
- Inditex: At a meeting held
at the headquarters of the Economic and Social Council in Madrid on 4 October
the Spanish textile group Inditex and the international trade union federation
IndustriALL Global Union celebrated the tenth anniversary of the Global
Framework Agreement which they signed with the aim of protecting and
promoting working conditions throughout the whole of the Inditex supply chain
(see press releases issued by IndustriALL
and by Inditex,
which give an account of the various stages in the cooperation between Inditex
and IndustriALL).
|
Trade
unions
SKF: More than 40 SKF trade
union delegates met in Gothenburg (Sweden) from 18 to 21 September, as part of the
meeting of the World Union Committee, which represents SKF employees in 20
countries. IndustriALL underlines the fact that “the opportunities and challenges of
the fourth industrial revolution were the main topics” of discussion with the
management, “together with the Working Climate Analysis and health and safety
issues”. A separate meeting of the European works council was held on 18 September
(see press
release).
- DHL-DP: The management of
the Deutsche Post DHL Group (DPDHL), the International Transport Workers’
Federation (ITF) and UNI Global Union have jointly asked the OECD’s German
National Contact Point for Multinational Enterprises to extend the protocol
signed in July 2016 to run until 2019, in order to continue with a regular
dialogue on industrial relations topics (see UNI Europa press
release).
- Korian: Employees and
union representatives from Korian, the
European leader in support services for senior citizens (with almost 47,000
employees), met in Brussels on 5 and 6 September, with the aim of improving the
way they coordinate their action and strategies in order to achieve better
salaries and working conditions for the group’s employees working in four Member
States (Germany, Belgium, France and Italy). This meeting took place under the
auspices of the European Federation of Public Service Unions which is developing
a strategy to coordinate trade unions at multinationals in the healthcare sector
(see press
release).
- Shell: Trade unions
representing Shell workers in 14 countries met in Vlaardingen (Netherlands) on
25 and 26 September within the framework of the Shell Global Union Network set
up by IndustriALL Global Union. The participants want Shell to recognise the
network as a partner for social dialogue on a global scale. The network is also
asking Shell to limit the use of precarious work and to apply the same health
and safety standards and procedures all over the world, at the same time making
them compulsory for the company’s suppliers (see press
release).
|
4. Studies
and reports
- Improvement in social conditions in the
Union: the latest quarterly
report on employment and social developments in Europe was published by
the European Commission on 5 October and confirms that there is an improvement
in terms of both growth and employment conditions within the Union. Employment
rose by 1.5 % in the EU over the second quarter of 2017, and growth reached 2.4%
(see press
release). The report contains full comparative data on the development
of both employment and unemployment (indeed long-term unemployment is still far
too high).
|
|
|