|
| |
IR Notes 98 – 23 May 2018
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
Who we are?
IR Share is a
provider that shares information, documentation and expertise for HR
managers and employee representatives. The IR Share agency operates by
way of online publications, working groups, training devoted to relevant
topics and a network of experts.
The team This issue
was produced by Frédéric Turlan. Find out more about the IR Share
team on our website
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95
or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
|
|
|
 |
| |
Interview
Michael Bach, IG Metall trade union secretary responsible for
ArcelorMittal’s German sites
You’re managing a network of works
councils in the European steelmaking sector. It’s the first
time that works councils from various companies in a
particular sector have set up a network of this kind. What’s
the thinking behind it? Europe’s iron
and steel industry is currently undergoing a reorganisation that
will have significant effects on its workers. ArcelorMittal (AM) is
planning to acquire Ilva. And at the same time, ThyssenKrupp (TK)
and Tata are planning to merge their steelmaking businesses. This
means that Europe’s largest producer (AM) will be merging with its
4th-largest steelmaker (Ilva) and the continent’s no. 2 manufacturer
(Tata) will merge with the no. 3 (TK). The end result will be the
birth of two steelmaking giants that will clearly result in a
further upheaval in the balance of power within the industry. Two
steelmaking giants will come into being, and will stand head and
shoulders above the rest of Europe’s steel producers. Many workers
will pay the price for this development, as their jobs will either
disappear due to restructuring or will move to new companies. At
least 4,000 jobs will disappear as part of the merger between
Thyssen and Tata. At AM/Ilva, only around 10,000 jobs are guaranteed
on Ilva’s Taranto site, meaning that almost 5,000 employees will
lose their job. As part of the conditions imposed by the European
Commission’s DG Competition, to prevent ArcelorMittal establishing a
monopoly in Europe in the wake of the Ilva acquisition, the proposed
disposals will see 15,000 employees cease to work for ArcelorMittal.
Their jobs will be transferred to companies that will have a new
owner. The long-term security of these jobs will depend primarily on
the motivations of the new owners.
What
benefits does a European network of works councils offer
compared to a network made up of European works councils or
trade unions? We’ve created a network
of works councils whose task is to keep one another informed
regarding developments affecting the industry. We want to inform
each other and learn from one another. Our aim is to share important
information as soon as possible, so that we can save time on our
activities. Mergers taking place in multinationals influence the
work undertaken in every company. However, none of these companies
is able to influence, alter or prevent these processes in any
significant way. That’s why it’s meaningful to have a dialogue
between works councils at European level. The existing structures,
such as the European Works Council, are limited to works councils
that form part of a single group. And European networks of trade
union representatives, for their part, do not have enough contact
with works councils. Until now, there had been no coordinated
dialogue between works councils from one particular sector. However
this network can now be used to exchange information directly, and
to discuss the options available for taking action, and their
ongoing development can then be pursued with other bodies. As the
businesses activities of groups are now taking on an increasingly
global nature, we also have to create different networks, so that
employees’ interests can be defended as necessary. Our network only
makes a modest contribution to meeting this challenge, but maybe it
will gather its own momentum in the future, and give rise to other
contributions. Pursuing a Europeanisation process of trade union
activities would be something that is entirely conceivable and
desirable.
How
are you financing it all? We launched
the works councils’ network a year ago. We organise our meetings on
a very frugal basis. We stay in low-cost hotels and arrange
translations at company level. Here, we benefit from charitable
support provided by multilingual colleagues. Any unavoidable costs
are paid by the companies within which the works councils operate.
Group management teams are earmarking substantial sums of money for
the development and implementation of group strategies. It goes
without saying that costs incurred in connection with providing
information to works councils and the discussions between them
should also be included in these budgets. However, we haven’t yet
had any discussions with management on this subject.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and
its network of experts, and is available in several European languages. It
offers Europe-wide monitoring of employment law, labour relations and
employment policy. It is available by subscription for 15 euros per month
(excluding tax), via the IR
Share website. IR Share is a privately-
owned, independent, apolitical company whose aim is to inform and assist all
players involved in social dialogue within and outside Europe. It has been
the correspondent organisation for France of the Dublin Foundation since
2009.
|
|
|
Lead
story
Directive
2009/38 on European Works Councils has not achieved very much
On 14 May, almost two years behind schedule, the European Commission delivered its evaluation
report on Directive 2009/38 on European Works Councils and a more detailed
Commission
Staff Working Document, which succinctly analyses the question of national
transpositions and offers a summary of the report commissioned from consultants ICF
to evaluate the directive’s effectiveness, efficiency, coherence, relevance and
added value (see the Commission’s press
release). The evaluation report is disappointing in three ways: 1) Its late
publication prevents any significant initiatives being taken by a European
Commission and Parliament that are reaching the end of their term, thereby
emphasising, as noted by Peter Scherrer, Deputy Secretary General of the European
Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), the fact that European Works Councils “are clearly
not a priority for the Commission”. 2) Despite a long adoption process, in the end
the recast directive has made little impact: it “has provided some impetus” for
setting up EWCs and for the renegotiation of existing agreements, “but without
stopping the declining trend in the creation” of EWCs. Overall, the main objectives
of the recast directive, as set out in recital 7 (*) of the directive, have not been achieved. The
objective of creating more EWCs has not been met, with only around 20 EWCs per year
being set up since 2011. One half of the eligible companies have still not set up an
EWC. The desired level of legal certainty is not necessarily guaranteed by this
text, which remains complex and still contains a number of provisions that are
subject to interpretation. Thus the definition of transnational issues continues to
pose many problems for EWC practitioners who have to “interpret it in concrete
cases”. Lastly, the directive has “proved less effective as regards the consultation
right”, as “EWC members seem to have little influence on the decision-making process
in their companies, particularly the case of restructuring”. Moreover, the
evaluation revealed “weaknesses in the dedicated means for the EWCs to enforce their
rights, and significant differences in the levels and scope of sanctions”. 3) The
Commission does not draw any conclusions from this failure: it does not suggest
reducing the thresholds for establishing an EWC; or strengthening the consultation
process so that the opinion of employee representatives can be properly taken into
account upstream of decision-making; or reviewing the sanctions provided for in the
event of a breach of the consultation right; or granting the EWC the means to
enforce its rights. It simply proposes three remedies: a practical guide, using the
EU’s financial instruments and support for Member States to improve the application
of the directive (see article below). It remains to be seen whether these
initiatives will succeed where Directive 2009/38 has failed, i.e. assisting with the
establishment of EWCs in groups that still do not have such a body and injecting new
life into EWCs, so that they become a key player in transnational restructuring
plans.
(*) It is
necessary to modernise Community legislation on transnational information
and consultation of employees with a view to ensuring the effectiveness of
employees’ transnational information and consultation rights, increasing the
proportion of European Works Councils established while enabling the
continuous functioning of existing agreements, resolving the problems
encountered in the practical application of Directive 94/45/EC and remedying
the lack of legal certainty resulting from some of its provisions or the
absence of certain provisions, and ensuring that Community legislative
instruments on information and consultation of employees are better
linked.
|
1. European
Union
Legislation
Greenhouse gases: On 14 May,
the Council adopted a regulation on greenhouse gas emission reductions. The
regulation aims to ensure that the target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by
30% in 2030, compared to 2005 levels, is reached in sectors such as buildings,
agriculture, waste management and transport (see Council press
release). On 15 May, to assist with the upheavals created by these targets,
the European Trade Union Confederation published a guide
for a just transition to a low carbon economy (see ETUC press
release), which will be available in several languages over the next few
weeks.
|
Project
Serious divisions in the Council over the
“mobility package”: Member States are openly divided on the
issue of the “mobility package”, which includes a
series of proposals for regulation to cover road transport and sector-specific
social legislation. These proposals are currently being discussed in the
Council. During a meeting with her German counterpart on 11 May, the French Minister
for Transport, Élisabeth Borne, explained that the two countries had no intention of
“botching rules that will apply for at least a decade” (see joint
press release). Immediately afterwards, on 14 May, Transport Ministers
representing the “Road Alliance” (a body made up of 11 Western European countries
including Germany and France) took a strong stand on this matter. The alliance is
resolutely opposed to the liberalisation options promoted by the Bulgarian
presidency, with the support of the other Central and Eastern European countries
(see Alliance press
release). On 15 May, the Bulgarian Minister for Transport responded by
calling on the governments of these countries to present a united front against the
“mobility package” which “is particularly detrimental to the countries on the
periphery of Europe: Bulgaria and Romania”.
|
Social
update
The Commission’s proposals to improve the
application of Directive 2009/38 on European Works Councils:
In its evaluation
report on Directive 2009/38 (see Lead story), the Commission envisages the
publication of a handbook to facilitate implementation of the directive. The
handbook would aim to: 1. increase the take-up of European Works Councils; 2.
further improve the effectiveness of European Works Councils; 3. spread good
practice. The document will be further developed this year, in cooperation with the
social partners and with the support of experts. The Commission also plans to
earmark 7 million euros for the call for proposals that will be launched after the
guide’s publication, to provide financial support for social partners who launch
projects to publicise and support the use of this guide, or to raise awareness of
the potential benefits of European Works Councils for companies and employee
representatives, and improve the establishment and functioning of European Works
Councils. Lastly, the Commission has announced that it will support Member States’
work to improve implementation of the Directive’s provisions, and will facilitate
exchanges between them, “notably on the design of ‘effective, proportionate and
dissuasive’ sanctions in the event of infringement of the Directive’s provisions”.
N.B. The Commission’s
staff working document includes, in the form of appendices, an overview of
the national provisions adopted with respect to the settlement of disputes (Appendix
5) and sanctions (Appendix 6).
- BusinessEurope issues its opinion on the
forthcoming European Labour Authority: In a position
paper adopted on 7 May, the employers’ organisation BusinessEurope issued its
opinion on the European Commission’s decision to create a European Labour
Authority. Among other things, it believes that the authority should not become
involved in corporate restructuring plans.
|
Trade
unionism
CEC European Managers congress:
On 24 and 25 May, the organisation CEC European Managers, which
describes itself as the independent voice of executives, managers and professionals
in Europe, is holding its congress in Mainz, Germany. On 24 May, the confederation,
which is a European social partner recognised by the European Commission, will renew
its committees and decide the policy platform for its future action. On the
following day, there will be a seminar on the theme of “Managers in the age of
artificial intelligence”. All resolutions and related documents will be published on
the organisation’s website.
|
2. Member
States
Germany
21st DGB congress: DGB, the
German Trade Union Confederation, held its congress from 13 to 17 May, in Berlin.
With just under 6 million members, it remains a powerful organisation but it is
experiencing a downward trend in its membership. At the end of 2017, its eight
affiliated federations had 52,000 fewer members than they had one year earlier. Ten
years ago, it still had 6.5 million members. Germany’s population curve and the
increase in precarious employment, which is unfavourable to trade union membership,
are the main explanations put forward for this decline. The congress renewed the
outgoing management team led by Reiner Hoffmann, aged 62, who was elected unopposed.
However, he obtained a disappointing share of the votes (this year’s figure of 76.3%
was far less than the 93.1% he secured in 2014), which was seen as a rebuke for his
very public support for the formation of a CDU/CSU-SPD grand coalition to govern the
country. The topics of digitisation and the future of work featured prominently in
the discussions, as did the need to increase collective bargaining coverage and the
number of works councils in Germany, both of which are vital elements in delivering
“good work”, as Reiner Hoffmann restated.
|
DGB plans to support a social Europe:
DGB took the opportunity to include the issue of a social Europe
on its congress agenda (see above), holding a round table discussion devoted to “a
strong social Europe for a fairer globalisation”. For the first time, the leader of
a French trade union confederation was invited to address the congress: Laurent
Berger, Secretary General of the CFDT, delivered a rousing plea for trade unions to
leave behind their role as observers and commentators, and instead to come up with
creative proposals in a context of technological and climate change. “Europe is an
opportunity”, he repeated to applause from those present. The round table discussion
also showed delegates how EWCs could help to create social standards at European
level, as emphasised by Albert Kruft, secretary of the Solvay EWC, in relation to
the recent charter recognising previous career experience gained by employee
representatives (see IR Notes
no. 96) and by Bianca Cuciniello, deputy secretary of the Groupama EWC, in
relation to a charter on the subject of digitisation, due to be signed shortly by
management and the EWC. The idea is that a social Europe can be constructed at
various levels, including that of company level. Moreover, as Albert Kruft pointed
out, social progress can also be made without having to adopt the German-style
employee participation model and can stem from observation of developments in
neighbouring countries. Peter Scherrer, Deputy Secretary General of ETUC, also urged
those attending the congress to look upon the EWC as one of the tools needed to
deliver employee participation and democratisation within companies. Like Laurent
Berger, he also called on the German and French governments to meet the challenge of
strengthening the concept of a social Europe, “which is essential not only for
Europe, but is important in global terms”, in the words of Sharan Burrow, General
Secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation (see DGB press
release and the website of the 21st
congress).
|
Austria
- A works council set up for the first time
at a food delivery company: On 12 April, the trade union
Vida announced the creation of a works council at the food delivery company
Foodora. The council now aims to negotiate a collective agreement with
management for the purpose of improving working conditions, e.g. by placing a
higher value on work performed under difficult conditions, such as outside in
the rain or at night. Seemingly the council is also seeking to reduce the number
of self-employed workers, and thus increase the size of the company’s workforce
holding employee status.
> See also other member
state information: in the latest Collective
Bargaining newsletter published by the European Trade Union Institute
(ETUI), and recent developments (Latest working life
developments) noted during the first quarter of 2018 in each EU Member State
by Eurofound correspondents (IR Share is a member of this organisation).
|
3. Companies
European
Works Councils
Kelvion: following the sale by
Germany’s GEA group of its GEA Heat Exchangers manufacturing business to the
investment fund Triton, the latter has reorganised this business into three
companies: Kelvion, Enexio and DencoHappel. On 20 December 2017, the new company,
known as Kelvion, established an EWC, (agreement recently published on line
by the European Trade Union Institute). For the first time as far as we are
aware, the transnational competence of an EWC encompasses subjects that concern a
country outside the EU and might affect European companies. As part of the
consultation process, in exceptional circumstances, members of the EWC select
committee will be entitled to hold preliminary discussions with employee
representatives at national level in the countries concerned, and with the experts
involved in the information and consultation process.
|
Restructuring
- ArcelorMittal: On 7 May,
the European Commission accepted the steelmaking group ArcelorMittal’s proposal
to divest itself of several companies within Europe, to enable it to purchase
the Italian steel producer Ilva. IndustriAll Europe has once again condemned the
lack of information provided to employees and the failure to consult them
regarding the disposal decisions dictated by the Commission within the framework
of the merger control procedure (see IndustriAll press
release).
|
Trade
unionism
- John Deere: Trade union
officials from three continents representing workers employed at the production
sites of the American agricultural and forestry machinery manufacturer John
Deere held a meeting on 10 May, within the framework of the global union network
set up in 2012. For the first time, representatives of the group’s management
attended the network’s meeting (see IndustriAll press
release).
|
Transnational agreements
- Toll: On 25 April, the
management of the Australian transport and logistics group Toll (44,000
employees) signed a global framework agreement with the International Transport
Workers’ Federation (ITF), to ensure safe and fair working standards for all its
employees across its 1200 sites in 50 countries (see joint
media release issued by Toll and the ITF).
|
|
|