|
| |
IR Notes 120 – 22 May 2019
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
A question for…
Francisco Javier Gómez Abelleira, Professor of Labour Law and Social
Security Law, Carlos III University Madrid
How did the government react to the
Court of Justice’s judgment (see Lead story) requiring employers
to put in place a system for measuring the hours worked by
employees? The government anticipated the judgment by
adopting a royal
decree 8/2019, in March, which
modified the Workers’ Statute. The Statute only obliges employers to
record overtime worked by employees, but not their normal working
hours. Furthermore, a
judgment delivered by the Spanish Supreme Court on 23 March 2017
had confirmed that employers were under no
obligation to keep a record of the hours worked by their employees
other than simply recording overtime hours worked. This decision met
with fierce criticism from the unions and the labour inspectorate,
because with no record of normal working hours, it is difficult to
establish exactly how many hours of overtime employees have worked.
In fact, it was common practice for overtime which would involve
increased social security contributions not to be declared to the
social security authorities, thereby depriving them of resources.
The new provision, which came
into force on 12 May, now requires employers to record all the hours
worked by their employees. The text is very strict: this general
requirement applies to all businesses, regardless of size, and to
all employees, whatever their rank – from manual worker to chief
financial officer -, with the only exception being the CEO. This is
not a problem for many employees, but it is complicated in the case
of employees who have a great deal of autonomy in their work and are
not bound by set working hours. It also sparks controversy as to
what actually constitutes working time, for example for people
travelling abroad: should travel time be counted as working time?
What about a night spent abroad? Or should the employee’s visit to a
museum during the trip be left out of the calculation? All of which
raises new questions about respect for employees’ privacy.
Adjustments will no doubt be required and the new legislation,
therefore, refers to collective negotiation, particularly in
businesses, where the employer will have to negotiate the
introduction of the system for measuring hours worked with the trade
unions and/or elected staff representatives.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| |
Who we are?
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and its
network of experts, and is available in several European languages
(English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). It offers Europe-wide
monitoring of employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It
is available by subscription for 18 euros per month
The team This issue
was produced by Predrag
Bejakovic and Frédéric
Turlan. Find out more about
the IR Share
team on our website
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR Share
website or by calling us on: +33
(0)6 81 41 53 95 or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
Legal notice.
Publisher: IR Share SARL – 5, Les Compères – 89520 Fontenoy, France –
Tel.: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 – share capital 1,500 euros – commercial
register (RCS Auxerre): 512 567 959. Managing editor: Frédéric Turlan.
Hosting: Ideal prod – 14 rue Auguste Morel – 89100 Sens – France –
Tel.: + 33 (0)3 86 83 21 21
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Lead
story
An
obligation to record working hours
On 14 May, the Court of Justice issued a very important ruling in a Spanish case in
which the CCOO trade union federation criticised Deutsche Bank for not having set up
a system for recording the hours worked each day by employees (v. IR Notes n° 113).
The Court of Justice emphasises “that in the absence of such a system, it is not
possible to determine objectively and reliably either the number of hours worked by
the worker and when that work was done, or the number of hours worked beyond normal
working hours, as overtime” (case
C-55/18, Federación de Servicios de Comisiones Obreras (CCOO)/Deutsche
Bank). “In those circumstances”, adds the Court, “it appears to be
excessively difficult, if not impossible in practice, for workers to ensure
compliance with the rights conferred on them by Article 31(2) of the Charter and by
Directive 2003/88, with a view to actually benefiting from the limitation on weekly
working time and minimum daily and weekly rest periods provided for by that
directive.” Consequently, in order to ensure the effectiveness of these rights, “the
Member States must require employers to set up an objective, reliable and accessible
system enabling the duration of time worked each day by each worker to be measured”.
The States, however, have the flexibility to decide “the form that it must take”
having regard to “the particular characteristics of each sector of activity
concerned, or the specific characteristics of certain undertakings concerning, inter
alia, their size (…)”. (see press
release). This ruling applies not only to the Member States but also to
employers. In fact, the Court states that such a system “enabling the duration of
time worked each day by each worker to be measured falls within the general
obligation, for Member States and employers, laid down in Article 4, paragraph 1,
and Article 6, paragraph 1, of Directive 89/391, to provide the organisation and
means necessary for the protection of the safety and health of workers”. Several
European trade union federations have welcomed this decision. IndustriAll Europe
describes it as “an important step towards ending abusive unpaid overtime” (see press release) whilst
the EPSU sees it as an important ruling for the countries which have allowed
employers to introduce an individual opt-out from the 48-hour maximum average
working time (see press
release). For Esther Lynch, Confederal Secretary at the European Trade
Union Confederation, “the best way for employers to respond to this ruling is to
meet with trade unions and agree fair and transparent systems (…).” (see declaration).
|
1. European
Union
Social
update
EU strategy for 2019-2024 :
at an informal
meeting held in Sibiu (Romania), EU leaders discussed the EU’s next strategic agenda
for the period 2019-2024 based on a “Leaders’
Agenda Note” drafted by Donald Tusk, the President of the EU Council (see press
release). One of the chapters includes the objectives of “reducing
inequalities, ensuring adequate social protection and inclusive labour markets, and
reducing disparities through cohesion”. They also unanimously adopted the “Sibiu Declaration”
which includes ten commitments such as “we will always uphold the principle of
fairness, whether it be in the labour market, in welfare, in the economy or in the
digital transformation”. The European Trade Union Confederation endorses the
commitments but wants to see a plan with concrete actions (see press release).
- A rise in the employment rate in the
EU: In 2018, the employment rate among the population
aged between 20 and 64 in the EU stood at 73.2%, a figure higher than 2017
(72.2%), according to Eurostat (see newsrelease).
The Europe 2020 strategy target is to reach a total employment rate of at least
75% in the EU by 2020. Each country also has its own target to achieve. 13
Member States have already met this.
|
Case law
Part-time parental leave must not reduce
compensation payments for the termination of an employment contract:
the EU Court of Justice delivered a ruling in a
French case involving a sales assistant who was made redundant as part of a
collective redundancy scheme (CJEU,
8 May 2019, case C-486/18, Praxair). Having been taken on on a full-time
contract, she was, in the two years prior to her redundancy, employed part time
while she took parental leave to bring up her children. Her redundancy pay and
redeployment leave allowance were calculated on the basis of her part-time work
rather than her salary before she went on parental leave, when she worked full time.
Confirming its case law (CJUE,
22 October 2009, case C-116/08, Meerts, and CJEU,
27 February 2014, case C-588/12, Lyreco Belgium), the Court explains that
such a calculation could discourage workers from taking part-time parental leave and
runs counter to the aim of the European
framework agreement on parental leave. The redundancy pay and the
redeployment leave allowance must be calculated “entirely on the basis of the
full-time salary of that worker”. Furthermore, the Court of Justice adds that the
French provisions which allow for the inclusion of periods of part-time work in the
calculation of redundancy pay contravene article 157 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the EU (principle of equal pay). In fact, they constitute indirect
discrimination towards women, because it is they who make up the vast majority of
workers taking part-time parental leave. This is important because, on the basis of
non-compliance with article 157, the Court allows the French judge to disapply the
national provisions which contravene EU law and immediately make good the harm
suffered by the employee (see. press
release).
|
2. Member
States
Croatia
- Minimum wage :
on 16 May, the Ministry of Labour and
Pensions set up a working group to set the minimum wage. Previously, the minimum
wage was fixed by the government following consultation with social partners.
The amount will now be suggested by the working group, which is made up of
employers’ and trade-union representatives and academics. It is expected to
announce its suggestion by the beginning of September.
|
Slovakia
- Holiday vouchers : Since 1
January, employers with 50 or more employees have had to pay 55% of the
accommodation and meal costs incurred by employees who, while on leave, spend at
least two nights in an accommodation establishment located within the country,
up to a maximum of 275 euros per annum. This allowance, which is payable to
employees with at least two years’ service, is aimed at promoting tourism within
Slovakia. The employee does not have to pay either tax or social security
contributions on it, while the employer can treat it as a tax-deductible
business expense.
|
3.
Companies
Transnational agreement
Limiting the use of temporary labour :
on 10 May, the management of Unilever and the international
trade union federations IndustriAll Global Union and IUF signed a global agreement
to limit the use of temporary workers and protect permanent jobs in Unilever
factories. This “Joint
Commitment on Sustainable Employment in Unilever Manufacturing“ applies to
employees in more than 300 Unilever factories in 69 countries, whether employed
directly by Unilever or through a third-party provider. This agreement restricts the
hiring of temporary workers to short-term and non-recurring tasks and prevents
temporary contracts being used to avoid regular employment. The agreement stipulates
that temporary workers will be informed of their work schedules with sufficient
notice and not be retained on call without pay (see press release from
IndustriAll and the IUF).
|
Trade
unionism
Trade union presentations to
shareholders: on 15 May, in a rather rare occurrence, the
international trade union federations IndustriAll Global Union and the BWI spoke at
the general meeting of LafargeHolcim shareholders to
denounce a number of violations of workers’ rights. The press
release includes links to the speeches which have been posted on
YouTube.
- Global trade union network:
a trade union network has been set up in the specialist health care group
Fresenius (280,000
employees) to negotiate a global framework agreement (see press releases from UNI
Global Union , PSI
and the EPSU).
|
4. Studies
and reports
Working conditions around the world :
to mark its 100th birthday, the International
Labour Organisation has published a joint report with the European Foundation for
the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) on “working
conditions in a global perspective“. The report provides the first
comparative analysis of job quality surveys carried out in 41 countries, mainly over
the last five years. It covers the 28 countries of the EU, China, South Korea, the
United States, Turkey, the Spanish-speaking countries of Central America, Argentina,
Chile and Uruguay (see press
release).
|
|
|