|
| |
IR Notes 147 – 9 September 2020
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
A question for…
Isabelle Schömann, Confederal Secretary of the European Trade Union
Confederation (ETUC)
The ETUC is organising a conference
on the theme of European Works Councils, on 9 and 10 September.
Why is the ETUC keen to advance this subject on the European
agenda? European Works Councils are one of the key
mechanisms for ensuring that multinational companies adhere to
established procedures for informing and consulting workers in the
various European countries in which these companies operate. EWCs
play a vital role in ensuring that social justice functions smoothly
and is maintained within multinational companies. It is thanks to
European Works Councils among other things, but also the fact that
workers really do exercise their rights to be informed and consulted
and to take part in decisions affecting them, that Europe can pride
itself on being a Social Europe, and a place where these rights are
alive and well, and can be asserted. These EWCs and the rights they
defend take on even greater significance in a time of crisis. The
crisis we are now living through is unprecedented, and before long,
the restructurings already being witnessed will multiply, with
devastating consequences for workers if no action is taken. European
Works Councils have the capacity to ensure that any restructuring
process is carried out in a sustainable and socially acceptable way,
with the aim of safeguarding employment and guaranteeing that
workers have access to training and redeployment, or even to new
jobs. However, in their current form, EU law and national laws do
not allow workers to actually exercise their rights to be informed
and consulted, and to take part in decisions affecting them.
Numerous studies have shown that European Works Councils are not
being informed, or at least are not being informed in time to allow
them to help shape changes taking place within their company: this
is primarily because the sanctions imposed on employers who breach
the obligations incumbent on them are too ineffective to act as a
deterrent. Moreover, the system makes it difficult for EWCs to
access justice, meaning that they are unable to assert their rights.
In response to the political inertia – despite the many warnings we
have issued and the fact that urgent action is required – the ETUC
and the European Parliament are now mobilising. This conference
sends out a clear signal that democracy in the workplace lies at the
heart of the answers needed to deal with the current crisis.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Agenda
16 September On line A
webinar devoted to the EPSU v. European Commission case, relating to the
sector-specific agreement signed by central government administrations,
which the Commission refused to submit to the Council with a view to
converting it into a European directive. The webinar is being organised
by the Atelier de droit social-Crides [Crides employment law workshop]
of the Catholic University of Leuven, in association with ULB and
USaintLouis Bruxelles. Speakers include Filip Dorssemont (UCLouvain),
Silvia Borelli (Ferrara University), Edoardo Traversa ((UCLouvain),
Antoine Bailleux (USaintLouis) and Emmanuelle Bribosia (ULB). Contact:
catherine.vanderlinden@uclouvain.be
|
|
|
 |
| |
Obituary
Farewell to Fernando
This summer, Social Europe has lost
one of its most ardent defenders in the person of Fernando
Vasquez. At the age of 68, he has succumbed to
an aggressive cancer but he will have left his mark on the European
social legislation of the 1990s and 2000s, fighting tooth and nail to
defend the principle of informing and consulting workers, notably as one
of the driving forces behind Directive 2002/14/EC “establishing a
general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European
Community”, which was adopted following the closure of the Renault
factory at Vilvorde, in Belgium. He also tried to impose a proper
strategy on the Commission in terms of anticipating and accompanying
restructurings, by providing technical support to the Spanish MEP
Alejandro Cercas (S&D) who, in 2013, submitted a resolution to
Parliament, urging the Commission to take a legislative initiative in
this area. He never despaired about the state of the European Union but
came to the conclusion that there could be no future for the
construction of Europe if this goal were to be pursued on the basis of
ongoing neoliberal dogma, and without the benefits of solidarity and
social justice. As he liked to point out in recent years, especially at
the conferences organised by his friend Professor Alain Supiot, these
terms – solidarity and social justice – feature in the existing EU
treaty: his aim here was to defend the idea that we don’t need to waste
time changing the text of European treaties, as they already contain
everything needed for a progressive social policy. IR Notes, for which
he wrote a number of opinion pieces, as well as every single employee
who has benefited from the right to know what will happen to them in the
event of a company reorganisation, owes him a considerable debt of
gratitude. The IR Notes editorial team has lost a friend and sends its
sincere condolences to his wife, his children and to all his family and
friends.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Who we are?
IR Notes
is a fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and its
network of experts, and is available in several European languages
(English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). It offers Europe-wide
monitoring of employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It
is available by subscription for 18 euros per month.
The team This issue
was produced by Pascale
Turlan, Frédéric Turlan, Sophia Reisecker
and Aimee
Waldon. Find out more about
the IR Share
team on our website
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95
or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
Legal notice.
Publisher: IR Share SARL – 5, Les Compères – 89520 Fontenoy,
France – Tel.: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 – share capital 1,500 euros –
commercial register (RCS Auxerre): 512 567 959. Managing editor:
Frédéric Turlan. Hosting: Ideal prod – 14 rue Auguste Morel – 89100
Sens – France – Tel.: + 33 (0)3 86 83 21 21. CPPAP no.: 0621 Z 93933.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Lead
story
The
ecological and social transition in practice
Abandoning the use of fossil fuels to produce energy is one of the measures intended
to reduce the impact of human activity on the earth’s climate. The agreements
negotiated between the social partners in recent years foreshadow forthcoming
negotiations that will affect other sectors of activity. For example, in October
2018, the Spanish government and the trade-union federations UGT Fica and CC.OO
Industria signed an agreement on a just transition in the coal mines that will have
to close pursuant to the EU’s decision
(see press releases issued by UGT
Fica and CC.OO
Industria). The agreement forms part of a just transition deal, and as such
has been praised by IndustriAll
Global Union and IndustriAll Europe.
The German Parliament recently (on 3 July) passed the law on ceasing the use of coal
by 2038. This law provides for the creation of a compensation fund for the benefit
of employees who are aged at least 58, and who lose their job in regions affected by
the closure of lignite mines and lignite-fired power stations. This fund, which is
financed by the federal State, will be used to pay a transition allowance, lasting
no more than five years, to the employees concerned until they reach retirement age.
Around 5 billion euros has been paid into the fund. To benefit from the financial
support provided for by law, several companies have negotiated agreements to
safeguard the jobs of the employees affected, and to encourage their oldest workers
to accept voluntary redundancy. For example, on 28 August, the management of the
energy group RWE signed an agreement with the trade unions IG BCE and Ver.di, which
will continue to be applicable to its 10,000 employees until the end of 2043. The
agreement prohibits compulsory redundancies and provides for a number of measures: a
voluntary redundancy scheme under which the levels of compensation paid will vary
according to an employee’s age, length of service and a number of social factors;
recourse to various forms of reduced working time; recourse to training while
employees continue to receive their wages; the creation of a transfer company (to
prepare for outplacements) to which an employee can be transferred for a one-year
period on 80% of their latest gross wage; an increase in the transition allowance
financed by the adjustment fund to cover at least 80% of the employee’s latest net
wage; and payment of a one-off 12,000 euro lump-sum bonus (gross value) to everyone
who agrees to join this scheme during the two-week period following signature of the
agreement (see Ver.di’s press
release). An agreement of the same type has also been signed at Onyx and
Uniper (4,000 employees in Germany) (see Ver.di’s press
release). All of these texts need to be examined closely with a view to
reaching a balance in future agreements between the various interests involved.
However, these agreements should also concentrate the minds of decision-makers: what
is deemed socially acceptable is so, because the State is involved in financing the
schemes concerned. The ecological transition cannot be socially acceptable without
proper financing.
|
1. European
Union
Legislation
Publication of the “mobility package” :
Three texts intended to improve drivers’ working conditions and
to reduce the risk of unfair competition in the road transport industry (see IR
Notes no. 146, Lead Story) were published in the OJEU on 31 July. These are as
follows: 1° Regulation
(EU) no. 2020/1054 of 15 July 2020 as regards minimum requirements on
maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest
periods, and positioning by means of tachographs. 2° Regulation
(EU) no. 2020/1055 of 15 July 2020 on adapting to developments in the road
transport sector. 3) Directive 2020/1057
of 15 July 2020 laying down specific rules for posting drivers in the road
transport sector.
|
Proposal
- Free movement during the era of Covid-19 :
On 4 September, the European Commission adopted a proposal
for a Council recommendation seeking to guarantee that all of the
measures taken by Member States to restrict free movement due to the coronavirus
pandemic are coordinated and clearly communicated at EU level (see press
release).
|
Social
update
SURE initiative : On 24 August,
the European Commission submitted proposals to the Council for decisions to grant
financial support worth 81.4 billion euros (of the 100 billion budgeted) to 15
Member States under the SURE instrument. This is the temporary mechanism that allows
Member States to access loans granted at favourable interest rates for the purpose
of supporting or setting up short-time work schemes (see press
release).
|
Trade
unionism
Minimum wage : The Executive Committee of the European Trade Union Confederation
has called on its affiliates to vote on its draft response to the Second Phase Consultation launched by
the European Commission on the introduction of a fair minimum wage in
the European Union. In this text,
which was approved by a large majority of its affiliates (85% for, 11% against
and 4% abstentions), the ETUC demands in particular that Member States should
not be allowed to fix their statutory minimum wage floors below a threshold of
decency; it also calls for an end to unfair practices such as employer
deductions from the statutory minimum wage, and for collective bargaining rights
to be promoted in each Member State. At the same time, without trying to
disguise the fact that there is a lack of unanimity on this text among its
members, the ETUC has launched an action plan to support the demands it is
submitting to the EU institutions and Member States, calling for the support of
its affiliates.
- “Restructuring” directive:
In an article published in Social
Europe, the two Deputy General Secretaries of the IndustriAll Europe
union federation, Isabelle Barthès and Judith Kirton-Darling, sound “the klaxon
to warn policy-makers and politicians of the coming tide of company
restructuring”. To address this issue, they have revived the resolution
passed by the European Parliament in January 2013, at the initiative of Spanish
MEP Alejandro Cercas, with the support of the late Fernando Vasquez, calling on
the European Commission to submit “a proposal for a legal act on information and
consultation of workers, anticipation and management of restructuring”. In the
authors’ view, it is high time that work on this project resumed and action was
taken, before the coming tsunami of restructurings reaches us.
|
2. Member
States
Germany
Wearing of the Islamic veil :
The Federal Employment Court has issued a ruling concerning
wearing of the veil at work. The case involved an IT worker who claims to be a
devout Muslim and wears a scarf as an expression of her religious beliefs. She
applied for a job at a school in the public education sector in the State of Berlin.
Following her interview, a female employee of the education authority asked her a
number of questions about her position on Berlin’s so‑called neutrality law, which
in general terms bars teachers from wearing garments with religious connotations,
while on duty. The claimant then declared that she would not remove her scarf in
class. After her application was rejected, she claimed that the State of Berlin had
discriminated against her on the grounds of her religion, in breach of German
anti‑discrimination law (AGG). The Federal Court held that the neutrality law
establishes a blanket ban that cannot comply with the requirements of either the AGG
or the German Constitution, or with EU law and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
The IT worker was held to be the victim of discrimination and is entitled to receive
compensation. In the Court’s view, the ban on wearing Islamic scarfs should only
apply in the event of any concrete threat to peace at school or the neutrality of
the State, which the authorities could not demonstrate here. Accordingly, this
blanket ban constitutes a disproportionate restriction on freedom of religion
(Bundesarbeitsgericht, ruling of 27 August 2020 – 8 AZR 62/1, see press
release).
|
Austria
Changes to the short-time working scheme :
In late July, the Austrian social partners (ÖGB, WKO) and the
government agreed a new short-time working scheme that will remain in force until 30
March 2021. The length of working time can be reduced by between 30 and 80%.
Employees will enjoy a remuneration equal to 80%, 85% or even 90% of their net wage,
based on the level of their gross wage. The social partners have made it clear that
they will check much more carefully whether the company applying to benefit from
this scheme really does have an economic justification for doing so. Under the new
scheme, any employees placed on short-time working must be prepared to undergo
additional training. The trade union confederation ÖGB has also suggested a “90 for
80” working time model: if four employees agree to voluntarily reduce their working
time to 80% (i.e. from 40 to 32 hours), a fifth person can then be taken on, to work
32 hours a week. The wages of the employees concerned should be cut only to a level
of 90% – the idea is for the difference to be made up by the public employment
department (see article
in Kompetenz). The proposal has aroused hostility among employers, and for
the moment, the government has taken no further action. > Find
out more: video
of the press conference broadcast by the ÖGB.
|
3.
Companies
European
Works Councils
Favourable opinion regarding an acquisition :
On 28 August, the European Works Council of the Canadian group
Bombardier adopted a positive
opinion, relative to the Alstom group’s proposed acquisition of Bombardier’s
transportation division – Bombardier Transportation. The European Commission gave
the green light for this proposed acquisition on 31 July. The European Works
Council’s opinion stated that it was satisfied with the process and with the quality
of the “information shared by management with the Select Committee, the experts and
the EWC”. The European Works Council held a series of meetings during this process,
including a meeting with the management of Alstom and the representatives of the
Alstom European Works Forum (EWF). The Select Committee met each week with the
Syndex experts to discuss the information obtained in detail. In terms of substance,
Alstom’s offer is presented as “the best solution” given the limited overlap between
the types of production involved, the significant technological complementarity and
the sound finances of the acquirer. The European Works Council is worried about the
company’s responses to the concerns expressed by the Commission affecting three
businesses, and has obtained management’s agreement to organise three specific
working groups. The Council also notes that the acquisition will surely result in a
reduction in headcount, notably in the support functions. It is therefore once again
demanding that Alstom’s management guarantees that the integration process will
proceed without any compulsory redundancies or site closures.
|
European
company
Compliance with the “before/after” principle :
In a ruling on 18 August, the German Federal Employment Court
referred a question to the EU Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling, concerning
the right of the IG-Metall and Ver.di trade unions to each appoint a trade union
official from outside the company, to join the employee representatives on the
supervisory board of the software group SAP SE. According to the Federal Court,
where a European company (SE) is created by converting a limited company that is
subject to joint management based on equal representation of management and
employees, Article 21 (6) of the German law on worker involvement in the SE
stipulates that a separate selection procedure (put forward by the trade unions) for
workers’ representatives on the supervisory board, must be guaranteed in the
agreement on worker involvement in the SE (see press
release). However, a provision contained in the agreement signed in 2014
between SAP management and the special negotiating group, allows the number of
directors to be cut from 18 to 12, while at the same time abolishing the right
granted to trade unions to appoint two representatives of their own. SAP believes
that these measures are lawful, notably by virtue of the principle of autonomy of
the parties, which governs how agreements on worker involvement in the SE are
negotiated. However, the Federal Court takes the view that this rule governing trade
union appointments should have been complied with, and calls on the EU Court of
Justice to check whether German law is compatible with Article 4, paragraph 4, of
Directive 2001/86/EC of 8 October 2001, which states that where a SE is created by
way of conversion, the agreement on worker involvement provides for application of
the “before/after” principle regarding all aspects linked to worker involvement,
i.e. the agreement should provide for a level that is at least equivalent to the
existing level within the company that is to be converted into a SE. The decision
has been welcomed both by IG Metall (see press
release) and Ver.di (see press
release) > Find out
more: The press
release issued by the Hans Böckler Foundation and a study that it recently
published on the various strategies put in place by German companies to escape
employee representation in management, including conversion into a SE (see press release).
|
Transnational collective bargaining
Covid-19 crisis : On 3 August, the management of the food manufacturing group Danone and the
international trade-union federation IUF committed to opening negotiations on
measures to support workers and mitigate potentially negative employment
consequences emerging during and beyond the Covid-19 pandemic. The
joint declaration
recognises that any future agreement will need to focus on identifying and
protecting the most vulnerable workers. It will also have to give priority to
upskilling programmes that provide employees with new skills to facilitate
internal repositioning within Danone. During this time, which could last up to
two years, Danone would guarantee that workers retain their Danone employment
contracts, salaries and relevant benefits (see IUF press
release).
|
|
|