|
| |
IR Notes 165 – 2 June 2021
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
A question for…
Carole Bourner, Generali EWC secretary
In what context did you draw up the
joint declaration on emergency situations (see 3. Companies), in
conjunction with Generali group
management? We issued this declaration at the time of
the Covid-19 crisis, in order to establish a framework for working
in “emergency mode”. At that time, management had just decided to
switch all employees over to teleworking: it had sent instructions
to this effect to IT departments and to all business units. At that
moment, nobody was considering the idea of discussing what the
future “new normal” would look like. Our initial focus was therefore
on work management during the pandemic. However, we soon realised we
wanted to move beyond this framework and prepare a text that could
also be used for tackling other types of crisis, whether
health-related or of a different kind. Moreover, as the public
health crisis became increasingly protracted, and we began to
realise that some forms of organisation would be permanent, we also
wanted to prepare the ground for a forthcoming dialogue with
management regarding the “new normal”. We didn’t have time to deal
with this topic before the national negotiations began, but that
isn’t really a problem. The EWC can intervene later on and discuss a
text that can be taken into consideration at national level, to make
adjustments to the initial agreements signed at this
level. The discussions
around this declaration lasted for one year. We established the main
basic principles: 1° everything that revolved around establishing a
balance between employees’ professional and personal life, plus
issues resulting from this, such as keeping to working hours and
respecting the right to disconnect at the end of the working day. 2°
We added a clause about exercising particular vigilance with regard
to families and employees who have children, as we almost lost some
people during this crisis. 3° A clause dealing with compensatory
measures for employees, and allowing countries to take advantage of
these to offset the financial costs borne by teleworkers. This isn’t
binding, but it’s a way of acknowledging that the matter can be
dealt with in local negotiations. Management accepted many of our
proposals. On our side, as the employee delegation, we tried not to
be too prescriptive, and not to secure rights that can be invoked by
employees directly, so as to avoid coming into conflict with local
trade unions. Now, in
conjunction with management, we’re going to launch a communications
campaign to publicise the declaration. A huge communications effort
needs to be made, to ensure that members of management at local
level are familiar with the text, and central management has already
heard the message. We will then be able to embark on further
discussions regarding the “new normal”.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Diary
9 June On line
Journée d’étude Europe [‘Europe Study Day’] – Droit à la
protection sociale en Europe : une réalité pour tous les
citoyens.ne.s ? [‘Social protection rights in Europe: a reality
for all citizens?’], organised by the Belgian trade union confederation
CSC.
10 June On line EWPCC
conference 2021 on the role of EWCs and SE-Works Councils in
addressing company policies to meet the health, employment and work
organization challenges of Covid.
11 June On line Seminar
organised by French members of the MoveS network, on the theme of « L’impact
de la crise Covid-19 sur la libre circulation des travailleurs :
Réflexion sur les catégories émergentes and leur pouvoir de
transformation » [‘The impact of the Covid-19 crisis on freedom
of movement for workers: Thinking on emerging categories and their
powers of transformation’], with a particular focus on crossborder
teleworking (the programme has not yet been published on line).
14 and 15
June Luxembourg
Employment and Social Affairs Council.
21 and 22
June On line
Seminar organised by the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) for new
EWC members. Registration.
28 and 29
June On line
Seminar organised by the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) on the
role played by EWCs in terms of CSR and non-financial information. Registration.
|
|
|
 |
| |
European Industrial Relations Dictionary
In case reading IR Notes inspires you to
explore this subject further, we are providing links to the European
Industrial Relations Dictionary published by Eurofound. This is updated at
regular intervals by IR Share, which publishes IR Notes. The term
definitions are available in English and can easily be converted
into other languages using on-line translation tools.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Who we are?
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and its
network of experts, and is available in several European languages
(English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). It offers Europe-wide
monitoring of employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It
is available by subscription for 18 euros per month .
The team This issue
was producaed by Pascale Turlan
and Frédéric
Turlan.
Find out more
about the IR
Share team on our website.
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95
or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
Legal notice.
Publisher: IR Share SARL – 5, Les Compères – 89520 Fontenoy,
France – Tel.: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 – share capital 1,500 euros –
commercial register (RCS Auxerre): 512 567 959. Managing editor:
Frédéric Turlan. Hosting: Ideal prod – 14 rue Auguste Morel – 89100
Sens – France – Tel.: + 33 (0)3 86 83 21 21. CPPAP no.: 0621 Z 93933.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Lead
story
A major step
forward for corporate tax transparency, and a small but useful step forward for
social transparency
After five years of difficult negotiations with several governments, legislators
reached agreement on revising Directive 2013/34/EU on “disclosure of income tax
information by certain undertakings and branches” thereby forcing multinational
companies to disclose how much tax they pay in each country. The proposal for a
directive has yet to be approved by the European Parliament’s competent committees,
and subsequently by a plenary session of Parliament, and by the Council. The vote in
plenary is expected after the summer recess. Member States will then have to adopt
the directive into their domestic law. This proposal puts forward rules forcing
multinationals (and their subsidiaries) with annual revenues of over 750 million
euros, and which are active in more than one country, to publish and make accessible
the amount of tax they pay in each Member State. This information will have to be
made available on the internet, using a common template, and in a machine-readable
format. To facilitate the use of the information provided and to increase
transparency, the data provided must include the nature of the company’s activities,
the amount of profit or loss before income tax, the amount of accumulated and paid
income tax and accumulated earnings. Among the items of information to be disclosed,
two will be of particular interest to social partners: firstly, the name of the
ultimate parent company and, if applicable, a list of all subsidiaries owned by the
company, a brief description of the nature of their activities and their
geographical location, and secondly, the number of full-time equivalent employees of
the company. All of this information should facilitate the steps that employee
representatives who work for these multinationals are required to take when they
wish to set up a European Works Council. Certain groups are somewhat opaque when it
comes to disclosing the numbers of their employees in the EU, and the distribution
of their workforce by country. Consequently, this historic step forward in the field
of corporate taxation might have a knock-on effect on collective representation of
employees within the EU. > Find out
more: article
by Evelyn Regner MEP (S&D) published by Social Europe.
|
1. European
Union
Legislation
Just Transition Fund now definitively adopted :
On 18 May, by an overwhelming majority, MEPs adopted the regulation
establishing the Just Transition Fund. This fund is intended to finance
assistance for jobseekers and workers who are upskilling and reskilling, as well as
the inclusion of workers and jobseekers in the European economy’s transition towards
a climate-neutral economy. To discharge its missions, the fund will receive 17.5
billion euros (instead of the 40 billion originally earmarked), to fund the
“territorial just transition plans” prepared by Member States that have committed to
achieving climate neutrality by 2050. States should prepare these territorial just
transition plans, “in social dialogue and cooperation with the relevant
stakeholders”. The IndustriAll Europe trade union federation regards the
establishment of this fund as “a milestone for workers and unions in their fight for
accompanying measures in the transition of workers” (see press release). Once
the Council has formally approved the regulation, it will enter into force on the
twentieth day following its publication in the OJEU (see European Parliament press
release).
|
Sectoral
social dialogue
Rail industry: On 18 May, the
social partners in the railway sector (ETF and CER) resumed negotiations at EU level
for a binding agreement aimed at promoting women’s employment in the sector. The
negotiations, which began in 2019, were put on hold during the Covid-19 crisis, but
the social partners now plan to reach an agreement before the summer, 15 years after
the last binding agreement was signed (see ETF,
IT
and CER
press releases).
|
2. Member
States
Germany
Law on modernising works councils :
On 28 May, Parliament definitively adopted the law on
modernising works councils (Betriebsrätemodernisierungsgesetz) (see decision).
The law, which is due to be published shortly, simplifies the
voting procedure used to elect works council representatives; boosts the job
security enjoyed by employees who are involved in setting up a works council;
reduces the age of eligibility for voting in elections from 18 to 16, and grants
permanent approval for the use of virtual works council meetings and of electronic
signatures for company agreements, an innovation that the parties involved
experimented with during the Covid-19 crisis. The law also strengthens the powers of
the works council, which now enjoys a co-decision-making right in respect of the
introduction of teleworking, and broader powers regarding the use of artificial
intelligence, notably in cases where it is used for employee selection purposes. The
right of recourse to an expert is provided for if the works council is required to
evaluate the introduction or use of AI when carrying out its duties. Parliament has
also extended the protection granted against workplace accidents to all of the
employee’s movements within their home (it no longer simply covers “work-related”
movements between the office and the printer, for example) and to journeys made by
employees in order to look after their children.
|
Virtual access for trade unions to employees :
On 22 April, the German chemical industry trade-union federation
and the rubber sector employers’ organisation signed a collective
agreement governing the trade union’s digital rights of access to employees
in companies by using electronic communication tools. This is the first agreement of
its kind in Germany. The Covid-19 pandemic has made it difficult for trade unions to
maintain contact with employees. The law allows the IG-BCE union to send e-mails to
employees; to use videoconferencing tools for trade-union meetings; and trade-union
communications to be made available on the company’s intranet (see press releases
issued by IG-BCE
and IndustriAll
Europe).
|
France
New figures published, measuring trade-union
representativeness : On 26 May, the
Ministry of Employment published the results
obtained by trade unions in workplace-level elections, which are used to
determine which trade unions will represent workers at industry level and national
level. To be deemed representative at both national and cross-industry level, a
trade union must secure at least 8% of the total number of votes cast. Five
trade-union confederations exceeded the 8% threshold this time, with a few
variations compared to the 2017 results. The CFDT remains in the lead with 27.77% of
the votes cast, followed by the CGT (22.96%), FO (15.24%), the CFE-CGC (11.92%) and
the CFTC (9.50%). Results broken down by industry will gradually be published from
September 2021 onwards (see press
release).
- Developing mentoring:
Within the framework of the “1
jeune, 1 solution” [‘1 young person, 1 solution’] plan, the government
has set up the “1 jeune, 1 mentor” service to speed up the
development of mentoring, by providing support to 100,000 young people by the
end of 2021, rising to 200,000 in 2022. For either short or extended periods of
time, the mentoring scheme connects young people aged between
13 and 25 with people who have experience and have volunteered to act as mentors
(employees, people who are retired, students, etc.). The mentors interact with
their mentees on a regular basis, to give them advice, share their experience or
place their knowledge and their networks at the mentees’ disposal, to help them
build a career plan.
- Experimenting with collective
transitions: The Ministry of Employment has signed the
first agreements linked to the “collective transitions” scheme provided for in
the recovery plan. This new scheme, which has been developed in conjunction with
the social partners, enables employers to anticipate economic changes taking
place in their sector, and provides employees with support for a planned
redeployment to other industries. It encourages job mobility and cross-sector
redeployment into emerging industries and short-staffed vocational
specialisations in sectors that are struggling to recruit. Following a training
course leading to a qualification certificate recognised by a particular sector,
the beneficiaries can move into their chosen growth industry before being
recruited by a company. While undergoing this training, those taking part in the
scheme are not classified as unemployed, and their wage or salary will continue
to be paid. Depending on the size of the company, the State will pay some or all
of the cost of employees’ redeployment training (including social security
contributions – both the statutory contributions and those payable under a
collective agreement), training costs for courses lasting up to 24 months, plus
a substantial proportion of the wages and salaries concerned. The Korian and
Derichebourg groups were the first to sign an agreement covering employees who
wish to follow a training course leading to the care assistant’s diploma. On 19
May, Korian and the supermarket chain Monoprix launched a new scheme for 60
employees who are currently working as check-out operators or display
merchandisers, but will now continue to be paid while training to become care
assistants. After obtaining their State diploma, these volunteer employees can
apply to Korian to be recruited on an open-ended contract (see Ministry
of Employment press release and Korian press
pack).
- Setting a quota for women:
On 12 May, the National Assembly [lower house] of the French
Parliament unanimously voted in favour of a bill to establish “genuine economic
and professional equality” between women and men. This law, which will now be
scrutinised by the Senate [upper house], requires companies employing more than
1,000 people to reach a target of having women make up at least 30% of their
“managerial staff and membership of their management bodies” by 2027, and 40% by
2030.
|
3.
Companies
European
works councils
Covid-19 and teleworking : On 10
April, following a year of negotiations, the Italian insurance group Generali signed a Joint
Declaration on the Emergency Crisis with its European Works Council. The
text aims to set out a number of “general principles” for all European
establishments to follow, “so as to inspire them to autonomously develop
initiatives, respecting the particularities of each country, intended to tackle
crisis situations such as the COVID-19 one and to start a gradual transition towards
normality”. EWC secretary Carole Bourner explains: “this text is vital for us
employee representatives, as it provides not only guarantees in the event of an
emergency, but also establishes the basis for our future
negotiations regarding the ‘new normality’ of what constitutes work”. The
declaration recognises that the switch to teleworking and digitalisation favours a
better reconciliation of life and work times, and at the same time, the growth of
productivity and the achievement of company results. The text contains provisions
covering health and safety, training, work-life balance and aspects of diversity and
inclusion, with reference to the previous joint
declaration issued in 2019. One of the main clauses relates to teleworking:
it establishes a right for employees to switch off after their working day and
encourages management at local level to deal with any adverse effects suffered by
employees as a result of isolation and the psychological impacts of remote working.
The text states that the select committee will be periodically informed about the
implementation and the evolution of remote working in countries that fall within the
EWC’s scope.
|
European
company
A EWC operating at company subsidiary level :
This Wednesday 2 June, the management of Hutchinson, a subsidiary of the
energy group Total, which manufactures and markets products derived from rubber
processing, held the first meeting of its European
economic and social information and exchange group. The creation of this
body representing the subsidiary’s European employees, which was not a statutory
requirement, was agreed at the time of the negotiations surrounding the SE
[société européenne] works council set up by Total under an agreement dated
15 April 2020. This Hutchinson-specific information and social dialogue body “is
supplementary to and distinct from the Total EWC and from the national bodies
already established within the Hutchinson group in Europe.” Accordingly, Hutchinson
group representatives on the Total group’s SE works council will continue to be
members of the latter. The new body, which comprises 15 members (including 4 for
France, 3 for Poland and 2 for Germany), is competent to deal with transnational
matters that concern either the group as a whole in respect of its EU dimension, or
at least two group companies or sites located in different Member States. One of the
novel features of the agreement is that competence extends to “matters which,
regardless of the number of Member States involved, form part of a significant
strategic change” decided on by central management, “bearing in mind the scale of
its impact on the European workforce, over and above the single country concerned”.
Moreover, some “local subjects” may be discussed, “provided that the matter in
question is likely to influence Hutchinson’s European position regarding the matter
concerned”.
|
4. Studies
and reports
Risks linked to using AI :
In a Foresight Brief published by the
European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) entitled “Algorithmic
management and collective bargaining”, Valerio De Stefano and Simon Taes
issue a collective warning to us regarding the urgent need to become aware of the
risks – on a scale that we cannot even imagine – linked to using algorithmic
management of work tasks, and more broadly, using artificial intelligence. This
study, which is rich in examples of using AI in the workplace, shows how “the
introduction of AI and of algorithmic management in the workplace is enabling a
pervasive surveillance of workers’ activities and performance and triggering grave
risks of unfettered exploitation, discrimination and OSH hazards, to an extent that
even most employers would currently find hard to envision”. Despite these huge
risks, the role played by trade unions is being seriously neglected. We at IR Notes
had already warned that there was no mention of social partners in the proposal for
a regulation on AI (see IR Notes no. 163).
However, the authors, who draw on Article 88 of the EU General Data Protection
Regulation, point out that: “Crucially, collective agreements can mitigate the risks
of AI-enabled surveillance and decision-making based on algorithms. They can ensure
the interests of workers are represented and emphasise the need for essential
safeguards to protect fundamental labour rights”. In view of the urgent need to
become a stakeholder, the authors invite employees, and more specifically the trade
unions in Europe, to reflect on a number of questions, such as: “Do you know if and
to what extent algorithmic management is being introduced in your country?” “Are you
aware of the risks associated with these developments?” “How can collective
agreements better provide adequate safeguards in the context of algorithmic
management?” “What role can trade unions play in the regulation of algorithmic
management?”.
|
|
|