|
| |
IR Notes 170 – 22 September 2021
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
A question for…
Sylvie Brunet, MEP (Renew)
In
your opinion, what are the strong points of the report on
platform workers, as adopted by the European Parliament (see
Lead story)? The risk at the outset
was promoting the idea that everything could be resolved via a
presumption of paid employment, i.e. taking the view that all
platform workers are employees, regardless of whether or not they
work via an algorithm, whether they work on site or remotely,
whether they are highly skilled or are in low-skilled jobs, etc.
What’s more, this arbitrary approach applies to only two sectors:
food deliveries and taxis. If we look at the situation today, most
people working in these two sectors are self-employed. Hence the
stance taken by the report, which is to advocate accepting that both
statuses – employees and self-employed workers – can co-exist. We
don’t want to completely get rid of self-employed work in sectors
that are in the development phase, and where jobs are being created
which may call for a certain form of flexibility, and are better
suited to self-employed status than paid employment. Now, once we
decide to keep both statuses – without creating a third one that
would give rise to further uncertainty – we need to use methods of
leverage to provide social protection for platform workers and
ensure that they are able to discuss their working conditions with
the platform. The report highlights two ways to exert leverage: the
first is to grant platform workers access to some kind of collective
representation for workers, so that they can discuss their working
conditions and take part in collective bargaining. The second way to
exert leverage is to reverse the burden of proof, in the event of a
dispute. It will no longer be up to the worker to demonstrate that
they are an employee: instead, the platform will have to demonstrate
that the worker in question really is
self-employed. These
changes should prompt platforms to review their practices, because
generally speaking, these workers are presumed to be in a
relationship of employment. This in turn exerts a certain amount of
pressure on platforms to improve their working conditions. It may be
in the interests of some platforms to switch their workers over to
paid employment, while other workers will continue to be
self-employed: however, the platforms concerned will make
improvements in terms of the information they provide to workers on
the algorithms used, and also as regards personal data protection
and pay, to ensure that their workers are not paid less than the
current minimum wage in the Member State concerned. We need to keep
both statuses, but at the same time nobody must be
sacrificed.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| |
European Industrial Relations Dictionary
In case reading IR Notes inspires you to
explore this subject further, we are providing links to the European
Industrial Relations Dictionary published by Eurofound. This is updated at
regular intervals by IR Share, which publishes IR Notes. The term
definitions are available in English and can easily be converted
into other languages using on-line translation tools.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Who we are?
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and its
network of experts, and is available in several European languages
(English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). It offers Europe-wide
monitoring of employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It
is available by subscription for 18 euros per month .
The team This issue
was producaed by Pascale Turlan
Frédéric
Turlan. Find
out more about the IR Share
team on our website.
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95
or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
Legal notice.
Publisher: IR Share SARL – 5, Les Compères – 89520 Fontenoy,
France – Tel.: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 – share capital 1,500 euros –
commercial register (RCS Auxerre): 512 567 959. Managing editor:
Frédéric Turlan. Hosting: Ideal prod – 14 rue Auguste Morel – 89100
Sens – France – Tel.: + 33 (0)3 86 83 21 21. CPPAP no.: 0626 Z 93933
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Lead
story
Parliament
is not advocating that platform workers should automatically be reclassified as
workers
The European Commission is due to present an initiative concerning the working
conditions of platform workers by the end of the year, following the two
consultation phases involving European social partners. It will now have to take
account of the new report published by the European Parliament, which has just set
out its position on this subject. In a resolution
on platform workers, passed on 16 September, Parliament did not argue in favour of
platform workers being reclassified across the board as “workers”. However, the
report prepared by French MEP Sylvie Brunet (Renew) and adopted by an overwhelming
majority (524 for, 39 against) invites the Commission to introduce “a rebuttable
presumption of an employment relationship (….) [in the case of] platform workers in
combination with the reversal of the burden of proof” into its forthcoming
proposal. MEPs believe that “whenever platform workers dispute the classification
of their employment status in legal proceedings before a court or administrative
body (…), it is for the party who is claimed to be the employer to prove that
there is no employment relationship”. However, MEPS warn that this presumption “must
not lead to an automatic classification of all platform workers as workers”. This
rebuttable presumption therefore “ensures that workers who are genuinely
self-employed are able to remain so and can continue to access work through
platforms”. MEPs are also abandoning any idea of an intermediate status between
employment and self-employment: “establishing a new EU so-called ‘third status’
(…) cannot be considered, as it would not help to solve the current problems and
risks further blurring already confused concepts”. This approach is supported by the
European Trade Union Confederation (see press
release). In addition to this issue of reclassifying the employment
relationship, the resolution also tackles those of: 1) equal treatment with
“non-platform workers of the same category” as regards the law and access to social
protection. They should “be entitled to receive compensation in case of work
accidents and occupational diseases, and be provided with social protection,
including sickness and invalidity insurance coverage”; 2) the disclosure by
platforms of various items of information to workers “concerning the functioning of
the algorithm”. The report points out that “any algorithmic decisions must comply
with the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing,
as enshrined in Article 22(1) of the GDPR, which means that there must be human
oversight”; 3) the “need for platform workers and platforms to be properly organised
and represented in order to facilitate social dialogue and collective bargaining”.
The Commission now has at its disposal replies from European social partners (who do
not intend to negotiate on this subject) and the report itself, and can use these to
prepare its proposal for a directive, publication of which is expected on 8
December.
|
1. European
Union
Social
update
Equal pay : On 2 September, MEPs
Samira Rafaela (Renew) and Kira Marie Peter-Hansen (Greens) presented their
report on the proposal for a directive “strengthening the application of the
principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women
through pay transparency and enforcement mechanisms” (see Equal Pay). The text is now
aimed at cases of discrimination on the basis of “gender” rather than of “sex”; it
introduces the concept of “intersectional discrimination” and sharply reduces (from
250 to 10 workers) the threshold at which the employer must provide information on
wage differentials. The report will be debated on 30 September at a joint session of
the Committee on Employment & Social Affairs and the Committee on Women’s
Rights. The Committee vote is scheduled for 9 December.
- State of the Union speech:
As usual, the President of the European Commission delivered the
annual
State of the Union speech to the European Parliament. However, the
President did not mention the terms “social Europe”, “social partners” or
“social dialogue” at any point during the course of a speech covering 17 pages.
The sole consolation is that the letter of intent sent to the Presidents of the
European Parliament and of the Council, which accompanied the speech, mentions a
single legislative initiative in the field of social affairs for the period
2021-2022: a legislative proposal relating to protection of workers from the
risks associated with exposure to asbestos at work (see Asbestos), which had
already been announced as part of the EU Strategic Framework on Health and
Safety at Work 2021-2027 (see letter
of intent). For its part, the European Parliament’s Committee on
Employment and Social Affairs is due to vote, on 27 September, on an
own-initiative report on this subject. One of the main debates centres on the
issue of fixing a specific limit value (0.001 fibres per cm3), rather than
leaving the social partners to decide this for themselves.
- SURE programme’s positive impact:
On 22 September, the Commission published its second report on
the impact of SURE, its 100 billion-euro instrument designed to protect
jobs and income affected by the Covid‑19 pandemic (see SURE initiative.
Unsurprisingly, according to estimates, the programme was used to finance
national measures that cut the numbers of the unemployed by almost 1.5 million
in 2020. Thanks to SURE and other support measures, says the Commission, “the
increase in unemployment rates in 2020 (…) was (…) clearly milder than
during the global financial crisis, despite the more severe drop in GDP in
2020”. Thus far, the EU has approved aid worth a total of 94.3 billion euros in
favour of 19 Member States, 89.6 billion of which has already been paid.
|
Sectoral
social dialogue
- Aluminium : On 1 September, the European Commission unveiled a proposal to
suspend anti-dumping duties on flat-rolled aluminium products imported from
China. The social partners in the aluminium sector have published a
joint statement
expressing their strong opposition to this move, “which would be a disaster
for European jobs and the ambitions of the European Green Deal” (see
press release).
|
2. Member
States
Italy
A first collective agreement at Amazon :
On 15 September, under the auspices of the Minister of
Employment, Andrea Orlando, the management of the e-commerce giant Amazon and the
Italian transport unions Filt-Cgil, Fit-CislI and Uilt signed a historic industrial
relations protocol, whereby Amazon: 1) recognises the three trade unions as social
partners; 2) undertakes to apply, to its employees, the national collective
bargaining agreement covering logistics, freight transport and shipping; 3)
undertakes to commence negotiations on matters of health and safety, workloads,
working time, bonuses, etc. The unions’ next aim is to extend this agreement to
Amazon’s subcontractors. This text has been welcomed by the European trade-union
federations covering the transport industry (ETF, see press
release) and service workers (UNI Europa, see press
release).
|
3.
Companies
European
Works Councils
A new EWC : The agreement
on setting up the European Works Council of the XPO Logistics group, signed on
31 October 2019, was published on 16 August this year on the French website where
collective bargaining agreements are filed. This is one of the few such agreements
in the road transport sector. It was negotiated following the takeover, in 2015, of
the French group Norbert Dentressangle by the US group XPO. The agreement provides
for the British delegation to stay on for a period of four years after the UK has
left the UE, and for a supplementary agreement to be negotiated when the third year
is reached, “so that the EWC can continue to function smoothly”. The British
delegation (21,855 employees) is the largest one, ahead of France (13,288) and Spain
(4,170). In total, 15 countries and 46,685 employees are represented on the EWC.
- Non-EU employees: the
European Works Council of the insurance group Axa has decided to meet at
regular intervals with staff representatives from its main non-EU countries. As
a result, select committee members held successive meetings over the course of
this year with staff representatives from Switzerland, Mexico and Japan (see press
release).
- Renegotiation: The
construction group Bouygues has renegotiated
its European
Works Council agreement. The main change is one relating to its
composition, while the other clauses remain unchanged.
|
European
company
Creation of a SE Works Council: :
the French group Edenred (4,100 employees in the
EU), which is specialised in service and payment platforms (meal vouchers, etc.),
was converted into a European company (SE) by a vote in favour at its general
meeting on 11 May this year. According to the document describing the proposed
conversion, this status “reflects the reality of the group more accurately”. The
group is “resolutely international, with a presence in more than 46 countries and
84% of its employees working outside France at 31 December 2019. On that date, 56%
of the group’s operating turnover was realised in Europe, where the largest
component (47%) of its workforce is based”. On that same day, an agreement on the Edenred
SE European Works Council was signed, replacing the first
EWC agreement, signed in 2014. The new text follows the European Works
Councils Directive very closely, and retains the definition of transnational matters
used by that directive, which is a more restrictive definition than the one used in
the directive on Employee Involvement in a SE, and contains provisions covering the
appointment of employee directors to the group’s management board.
|
4. Report
and studies
Putting the right to disconnect into practice :
The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and
Working Conditions (Eurofound) has published a study
analysing company practices involving the right to disconnect. This work will
nurture the thinking of European decision-makers who are due to respond to the
European Parliament’s request for a right to disconnect. Eurofound highlights the
fact that home-based teleworkers are twice as likely as workers employed on site to
exceed the limit of a 48-hour working week, and are much more likely to be working
during their free time. Analysing the experience of the first four Member States to
introduce – prior to 2021 – rules and agreements covering the right to disconnect,
Eurofound emphasises the importance of the social partners in guaranteeing that
these rules will translate into reality on the ground. The authors believe that a
legal approach requiring the social partners to take action could be beneficial in
terms of stimulating activity among the social partners.
- Apprenticeship in Member
States: On 14 September, the European Commission
published its evaluation
report on the European
Framework for Quality and Effective Apprenticeships, adopted in March
2018. This framework, which is non-binding, contains 14 recommendations to
Member States on ways to strengthen their apprenticeship system. As far as the
Commission is concerned, this framework continues to be relevant and it “remains
a key instrument to enhance the quality of apprenticeships across the EU”.
However, while seven of the criteria are being properly applied, seven others
require further progress. The report contains one fiche per country for
presenting and evaluating the apprenticeship system.
|
|
|