|
| |
IR Notes 172 – 20 October 2021
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
A question for…
Sylvain Renouvel, Head of European Affairs at Nexem and Director of the
Federation of European Social Employers
Social partners in the social
services sector have officially called on the European
Commission to set up a sectoral social dialogue committee
for them. This would be the first such new committee for
more than ten years. What do you expect this to
deliver? The Federation of European Social Employers
and the European Public Service Union have indeed jointly called on
the European Commission to create a European sectoral social
dialogue committee for social services. Although they employ more
than 11 million people in the EU27 and the UK, as yet these support
services providing assistance to the elderly, persons with
disabilities, children and to other vulnerable groups, don’t have a
European social dialogue structure of their own. Having a recognised social dialogue will
help to meet the challenges faced by the sector, such as the current
labour shortage, at a time when the needs for social care are
continuing to grow, particularly in light of the Covid-19 crisis and
the ageing population. The two organisations, which are generally
accepted as being representative of their members, recognise one
another as interlocutors for social dialogue at European
level. We didn’t wait for
a social dialogue committee to be formed before starting to work
together, on projects financed by the EU. These have led to a number
of European seminars and conferences being organised, and to joint
statements and positions being published, e.g. on the opportunities
and challenges represented by digitalisation, recruitment and
building up staff loyalty; the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic; and
the importance of developing social dialogue in the social
economy.One current project involves us working on the consequences
of the Covid-19 crisis for social services, on boosting social
dialogue capacities in central and southern Europe, and on sharing
practices aimed at boosting the sector’s appeal. We’re also planning
to take things further, once a sectoral social dialogue committee is
in place. We’ve received an encouraging response from Commissioner
Schmit, who has told us that our request is being scrutinised within
the framework of the process covering revision of sectoral social
dialogue, which is scheduled for 2022.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| |
European Industrial Relations Dictionary
In case reading IR Notes inspires you to
explore this subject further, we are providing links to the European
Industrial Relations Dictionary published by Eurofound. This is updated at
regular intervals by IR Share, which publishes IR Notes. The term
definitions are available in English and can easily be converted
into other languages using on-line translation tools.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Who we are?
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and its
network of experts, and is available in several European languages
(English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). It offers Europe-wide
monitoring of employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It
is available by subscription for 18 euros per month .
The team This issue
was producaed by Pascale
Turlan and
Frédéric
Turlan
. Find
out more about the IR Share
team on our website.
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95
or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
Legal notice.
Publisher: IR Share SARL – 5, Les Compères – 89520 Fontenoy,
France – Tel.: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 – share capital 1,500 euros –
commercial register (RCS Auxerre): 512 567 959. Managing editor:
Frédéric Turlan. Hosting: Ideal prod – 14 rue Auguste Morel – 89100
Sens – France – Tel.: + 33 (0)3 86 83 21 21. CPPAP no.: 0626 Z 93933
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Lead
story
The
Commission presents its work programme for 2022
On 19 October, the European Commission adopted its work
programme 2022, entitled “Making Europe stronger together”, which contains
42 new initiatives covering the six main ambitions set out in President von der
Leyen’s policy orientations. A table
sets out a summary of the proposals, revisions or withdrawals of texts that are now
deemed obsolete. The work programme announces a public consultation launched on the
same day, to debate the budget rules (which were suspended during the Covid-19
crisis) and the EU’s framework of economic governance. This is a crucial issue: it
comes down to establishing whether the Twenty-Seven plan to return to budgetary
orthodoxy, with binding convergence criteria, such as the deficit threshold of 3% of
GDP, or whether they agree to maintain a high level of public expenditure, even if
that means departing from the hitherto imposed budgetary standards. In the area of
social affairs, for all that the Commission emphasises the extremely effective
contribution made by “the European instrument for temporary support to mitigate
unemployment risks in an emergency” (SURE), it plans to analyse the results of this
scheme without taking further steps towards making it a permanent tool. The main
item on its programme in the employment field is monitoring implementation of the
action plan on the European Pillar of Social Rights, though no further details are
provided. It does however announce a number of specific texts: 1/ a legislative
initiative seeking to enhance the protection of workers from the risks associated
with exposure to asbestos at work (in the 3rd quarter), which will take account of
the outcomes of consultations with social partners. In passing, the Commission holds
out the hand of friendship to the European Parliament, by quoting its recent report
(see below) and concluding that it shares MEPs’ opinion that “the issue of asbestos
is of grave concern”. 2/ Another legislative initiative is announced with the aim of
boosting the role and independence of organisations promoting equality (in the 3rd
quarter), which will have an impact on how cases infringing the principle of
non‑discrimination will be dealt with, including in the field of employment. 3/ Also
worthy of note is a revision of the directive relating to certification of train
drivers operating locomotives and trains on the railway system, which should
facilitate driver mobility. Furthermore, while acknowledging that “the pandemic
highlighted the importance of strong social safety nets”, the Commission, which is
already struggling to promote its proposal for a directive on minimum wages, merely
announces a recommendation on “minimum income”. This will therefore be a non-binding
text designed to “support the policies of Member States” (in the 3rd quarter) in
establishing safety nets. In its programme (though not in the table), the Commission
will present a communication seeking to boost social dialogue at national and EU
level, “to support the key role of social partners in fostering a fair economic,
social and cohesive recovery and the green, digital and labour market transitions”.
Lastly, despite the United Kingdom’s departure, the Commission is maintaining its
“one in, one out” approach no matter what, “to ensure that when introducing new
burdens, we systematically and proactively seek to reduce burdens imposed by
existing legislation”. ETUC General Secretary Luca Visentini describes this approach
as a “populist gimmick” (see press
release) which, in terms of employment law, and workplace health and safety
in particular, may prove lethal.
|
1. European
Union
Social
update
Main outcomes of the Employment and Social
Affairs Council : the Employment Ministers of the
Twenty-Seven did not adopt any major texts at the Council meeting held on 15
October. The main step they took was to relaunch the European Semester process – the
annual process whereby Member States coordinate their economic, social and fiscal
policy within the EU (see European Semester). Ministers
want to see a return to a semester process that includes a strong social dimension.
They discussed how the European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan, and in
particular the EU’s three main objectives in terms of jobs, skills and reducing
poverty, can be reflected as effectively as possible in the future European
Semester. They adopted the key
messages of the Employment Committee and those
of the Social Protection Committee, as well as a decision
to maintain, in 2021, the guidelines laid down in 2020. The Commission will use
these documents to prepare the recommendations it makes to Member States. Ministers
also debated the European framework on health and safety at work, expressing the
view that new technologies and remote working may be relevant for enabling older
workers to hold on to their jobs. During the press conference, the Slovenian
Presidency emphasised ministers’ concerns regarding mental health and psychosocial
risks faced by workers. The Twenty-Seven also adopted Conclusions
on Gender Mainstreaming in the EU Budget (see Council
press release).
|
Asbestos : On 19 October, at a
plenary session, the European Parliament voted to accept the report
(see summary)
presented by Danish MEP Nikolaj Villumsen (The Left), who is calling on the European
Commission to put forward several directives in order to provide better protection
for workers against exposure to asbestos, in the context of the thermal renovation
policy set out by the Commission in a communication
dated 14 October 2020. MEPs are calling for a European framework directive for
national asbestos removal strategies, including the assessment of existing asbestos
in the built environment, and the creation of public digital asbestos registries
mapping all existing asbestos in a country or region. These registries should be
accessible for workers and companies, owners, inhabitants, and users of buildings
and regularly updated. Member States are called on to facilitate recognition
procedures by reversing the burden of proof, especially if national registers for
asbestos workers were set up only recently, and to establish adequate compensation
for workers suffering from asbestos-related diseases. The Commission should also put
forward a proposal for a directive setting minimum standards for recognising and
paying compensation for occupational illnesses, including asbestos-related diseases.
Member States are called on to facilitate the recognition of and compensation for
documented victims of second-hand exposure through non-occupational contact with
asbestos. The report is also calling for a drastic reduction in the occupational
exposure limit (OEL) applicable to asbestos. The current minimum standard applicable
within the Union is 100,000 fibres per m3 (0.1 fibre/cm3). While most States are
applying this minimum standard, others are using much lower OEL, e.g. the
Netherlands, where the limit is set at 2,000 fibres/m3 (0.002). In light of the work
undertaken by researchers, Parliament is asking for the OEL to be cut to 0.001
fibre/cm3 (1,000 fibres/m3). When questioned on the fringes of the Employment and
Social Affairs Council meeting on 15 October, Nicolas Schmit, European Commissioner
for Jobs and Social Rights, explained that discussions were in progress regarding
this requested reduction in the OEL and he would be seeking the opinion of the Advisory
Committee on Safety and Health at Work on Parliament’s report. “New limits
will doubtless be introduced, it’s an ongoing process”, he said. It will be recalled
that earlier, the Commission waded into the parliamentary debate, asking MEPs not to
reduce the limit, so that the social partners could be left to seek out the best
solution for themselves.
|
- Health and safety at work:
The European Parliament’s Committee on Employment and Social Affairs is
studying the report
on a new EU strategic framework on health and safety at work presented
by the European Commission, on 28 June 2021 (see IR Notes 167).
The rapporteuse, Danish MEP Marianne Vind (S&D), plans to beef up the
strategy by calling on the Commission to adopt legislation covering teleworking,
the right to disconnect and the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders and
psychosocial risks. The report, which can be amended by MEPs up to 9 November,
emphasises that it is time to “take seriously problems of stress, anxiety,
depression, harassment and burnout, as well as the negative impact on workers’
work-life balance when working in their free time”. The report, which includes
many of the demands put forward by the European Trade Union Confederation (see
ETUC
position), is expected to be adopted at a committee vote on 26 January
2022.
- Restructuring: The
European Commission is proposing to pay out 1.2 million euros from the European
Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), to support 300 former workers in the metal
sector in the Basque region in Spain. This is the first application for aid
under the new EGF regulation covering the period 2021-2027 (see press
release).
|
Case law
Airline strikes :
The Court of Justice has added to its case law
on payment of compensation to airline passengers whose flights are cancelled because
the company’s staff go on strike. Other than in cases where the demands of the staff
in question can only be met by the authorities, such strikes are inherent in the
normal exercise of an air carrier’s activity, even if they are illegal. They cannot
exempt it from the obligation to pay compensation to passengers. In so doing, the
Court is acknowledging that industrial action is “one of the ways in which
collective bargaining may manifest itself and, therefore, [it] must be regarded as
an event inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the employer concerned”
(CJEU,
6 October 2021, C‑613/20, Eurowings).
|
Sectoral
social dialogue
- Electricity :
On 22 September, the European social
partners in the electricity sector organised the final conference of their
Skills2Power project. Its main goal was to develop concrete joint strategies for
anticipating and monitoring the needs for skilling, upskilling and reskilling of
workers in the electricity sector in France, Italy, Spain, Hungary and Sweden
(see executive
summary of the final report and EPSU press
release).
|
2. Member
States
France
- Vocational training agreement :
During the night of 14 to 15 October, the social partners
concluded a cross-industry
framework agreement for the purpose of adapting the vocational training
reforms adopted in 2018. This text opens the way to a series of seven
themed negotiations, which the social partners plan to complete by the end of
June 2022. One of them will relate to the “vocational transition” scheme for
financing the redeployment of employees from one sector to another. As Les
Échos points out, “the importance of the agreement does not really lie
in its content, which gives rise to a handful of changes to social legislation
in the short term, but rather in its political scope”, which allows the social
partners to demonstrate that they are capable of negotiating based on their own
agenda, without government intervention, and of influencing the government that
will come to power at the next presidential election, due to be held in April
2022.
|
Luxembourg
Using the health pass at work :
In his State
of the Nation speech on 12 October, Prime Minister Xavier Bettel confirmed
that employers would be allowed to insist that their employees showed the health
pass (CovidCheck certificate) they already have to use in order to gain access to
public places such as restaurants. This additional constraint should encourage
people to get vaccinated, and thereby “firstly protect the health of employees, and
secondly allow a return to greater normality”. However, this proposal was rejected
by a trade-union front made up of three national confederations (see joint
letter sent to the Prime Minister and article
in the Luxemburger Wort daily newspaper), while the press reports that the amount of
progress made on using the CovidCheck varies from one company to another (see article
in the Luxemburger Wort). This new measure is due to enter into force on 1
November.
- Right to part-time working:
Prime Minister Xavier Bettel has indicated that the government is drawing
up “a ‘work-life balance’ plan”, which includes introducing the right to
part-time working. The transition to part-time working should not reduce “the
future pension entitlements of mothers and fathers”, as “the State will pay a
proportion of their contributions”. He specified that people who exercised this
right would be entitled, for a certain period of time, to return to full-time
working in their job. The plan will also include a measure to reward parents who
have both taken parental leave, in order to “promote an equitable distribution
of family roles”.
- Teleworking: Prime
Minister Xavier Bettel emphasised that “the pandemic has once again clearly
highlighted the benefits of teleworking”, as “many employees have experienced”
its “positive side effects”. Rejecting a return to the current model whereby
“hundreds of thousands of people commute daily from all directions to work in
the same conurbation”, the Prime Minister announced that the government would
“speed up the process of decentralising employment”, in order to “bring housing
and jobs closer together”.
|
3.
Companies
European
works councils
- Downsizing :
Negotiations are currently under way at the
Anglo-Indian steelmaker ArcelorMittal, with a view
to revising its EWC agreement. Management wants to adapt the body to match the
group’s new configuration. In point of fact, since it came into being in 2006,
the group has shed more than one third of its workforce worldwide. In the EU,
the number of employees fell from 111,000 in 2006 to 83,000 at the end of 2015,
and subsequently to 56,700 in June 2021. On 23 September, at a negotiation
meeting, management put forward proposals to 1/ cut the number of EWC members
from 42 to 14, by applying the calculation rules set out in the subsidiary
requirements of the directive; 2/ cut the number of select committee members
from 25 (a high figure that allows each trade union represented within the group
to have a representative on the select committee) to 4 members, which
corresponds to the size of the current secretariat; 3/ change the current
arrangement of one plenary meeting plus three annual select committee meetings
to four European Works Council meetings per year, one of which all deputy
members would be invited to attend. Management is demanding a “change in the
EWC’s structure”: in its view, this will create a “more efficient” council, with
“clearer governance” and a “more concentrated” number of posts. For their part,
the negotiators instructed by the EWC, who include an IndustriAll Europe
representative, emphasise that they have no mandate to change either the
council’s structure or the existing number of EWC or select committee members.
|
An agreement for overseeing negotiations :
On 5 May 2021, the management of the French
energy group EDF and its EWC
members signed a “method
agreement relating to the negotiations surrounding revision of the EDF
European Works Council Agreement“, signed on 14 November 2001, for the
purpose of overseeing its renegotiation process in the context of the “ongoing
Covid-19 public health crisis”. The EWC agreement had already been revised in
February and May 2005, and again in June 2015. The aim of these negotiations, which
commenced in late September, is to “modernise” the agreement, in order to bring it
“into closer alignment with the strategic issues facing the group”. The text of the
agreement defines the details of how negotiations are to be conducted, such as the
composition of delegations, organising preparatory and debriefing meetings,
resources to be made available, use of videoconferencing, and how the agreement can
be signed electronically. The nine secretariat members in charge of the negotiations
will report back to the other full members at “back-office” meetings, to be held
before and after each negotiation meeting with management. The negotiation body
includes a representative of each of the European trade-union federations, i.e.
IndustriAll Europe and EPSU. The agreement lasts for a fixed term, ending on 31
December 2021.
|
4. Studies
and reports
Platforms and safety at work :
The European Agency for Safety and Health at
Work (OSHA-EU) has published a Policy
Brief taking stock of the occupational health and safety risks faced by
platform workers. The document notes that: 1/ platform workers are more exposed to
these risks than other workers performing similar tasks; 2/ prevention and
management of risks is more complicated, due to the nature of platform work and the
conditions under which it is performed; 3/ there are critical knowledge gaps and a
lack of awareness of OSH-related issues in this sector.
- Social dialogue during Covid-19:
The ILO has published a study analysing 381 tripartite and bipartite
social dialogue initiatives between governments and employers’ and workers’
organisations at national or sectoral level, which have been instrumental in
shaping countries’ responses to the crisis (Social
dialogue in times of COVID-19 pandemic: What works).
|
|
|