|
| |
IR Notes 215 – 4 October 2023
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
A question for…
Isabelle Ferreras, senior research associate at the Center for Labor and
a Just Economy, Harvard; visiting fellow for 2023-24, Institute for
Ethics in AI, Oxford and Professor at the Catholic University of
Louvain.
You
were invited, as an expert, to attend the conference of the
Spanish presidency of the EU, on 22 September, at Santiago
de Compostela, on the future of work and social dialogue.
Democracy at work was one of the three topics discussed by a
panel. Is this concept one of growing importance on the
European agenda?
Yes, it’s really become a matter of debate
at EU level. The Spanish Presidency of the EU, in the person of
Yolanda Díaz, Minister of Labour and the Social Economy, has
included democracy at work among its priorities. She calls for
democratisation within companies and places this issue at the heart
of the European strategy, even speaking of a “bifurcation of the
European project”. She explained that this matter had to be at the
heart of the discussions, from this year onwards, when it comes to
drawing up the European Commission’s roadmap. Several days later,
addressing the ETUC executive committee, she once again placed
democratisation within companies at the centre of her speech. She
identified European Works Councils as the body that offered a
genuine possibility of achieving progress in the field of workers’
rights. So, there is real movement happening at European level, with
certain countries acting as the driving force: Spain of course, but
Belgium too – its Minister of Labour and the Economy Pierre-Yves
Dermagne was at the conference, and Belgium will be taking over the
presidency of the EU on 1 January 2024 for the next six months. The
Portuguese Minister of Labour, Ana Mendes Godinho, also issued a
very clear call for democracy at work to be placed at the centre of
our European strategy for managing the digital and green
transitions…. Lastly, there was an address by the European
Commissioner for Jobs and Social Rights, Nicolas Schmit, who
affirmed that democracy also has to exist within the economy and
that a new equilibrium has to be created within companies’
decision-making structure. According to Nicolas Schmit, workers must
have the right to “co-decide”.
>
Find out more: see Isabelle Ferreras’s website, link to the conference website and Yolanda Díaz’s address
to the ETUC.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Diary
9
October Luxembourg “Employment
and Social Policy” Council meeting.
12 October
Paris
Evening debate around EU labour law, co-organised by Paris 1 University
and the AFDT. Link
to registration form.
12 October
On-Line
Seminar organised by European social partners in the social
services sector, entitled: Improving
working conditions in social services: Good practices from across
Europe, with interpreting (EN ES, DE, FR) (registration).
16 and 17
October Bobigny
(France) Symposium organised to mark the
20th anniversary of the Giscop93 project, entitled Penser
le travail au prisme des cancers professionnels – une
priorité dans la lutte contre les inégalités sociales de
santé [‘Looking at work through the prism of
occupational cancers – a priority in combatting social health
inequalities’] (registration).
19 October
Paris
Conference organised by the Réalité du dialogue social
association, in conjunction with the Paris Friedrich-Ebert Foundation,
on « l’Avenir
du dialogue social européen : quel regard franco-allemand sur
l’agenda social de la législature 2024-2029 ? » [“The future of
European social dialogue: what is the Franco-German view of the social
agenda during the 2024-2029 legislature?”].
19 and 20
October Brussels
International Conference organised at the Free University of Brussels,
entitled “Which
future of regulation and policy for the prevention of psychosocial
risks in the EU?”, with Marian Shaapman and Aude Cefaliello
(ETUI), Agnes Parent-Thirion (Eurofound), Loïc Lerouge (CIECST) and
representatives of European institutions and social partners. Link to registration
form.
19 and 20 October
Barcelona Event
organised by the Spanish Presidency of the EU on active
labour market policies and competencies.
6 November
Berlin
Conference on Social Europe, organised by the Federal Ministry of
Labour, with Hubertus Heil, Nicolas Schmit, Yolanda Díaz, Gaby Bischoff,
Denis Radtke and representatives of European social partners.
13 and 14
November San Sebastián
European
conference on Social Economy within the framework of the Spanish
Presidency of the EU.
16 and 17
November Brussels
Second European
Employment and Social Rights Forum, devoted to artificial
intelligence and its impact on the world of work.
27 and 28
November Brussels
“Employment
and Social Policy” Council meeting.
28 November
Florence
Training course organised by the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI)
on “Sustainability
reporting standards: a tool for EWCs”.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Who we are?
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and its
network of experts, and is available in several European languages
(English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). It offers Europe-wide
monitoring of employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It
is available by subscription for 260 euros per year .
The team This issue
was producaed by Vasileios
Koniaris, Sophia Reisecker, Christophe Teissier, Pascale
Turlan, Frédéric Turlan and
Aimee
Waldon. Find out more about the IR Share
team on our website.
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calliang us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95
or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
Legal notice.
Publisher: IR Share SARL – 5, Les Compères – 89520 Fontenoy, France –
Tel.: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 – share capital 1,500 euros – commercial
register (RCS Auxerre): 512 567 959. Managing editor: Frédéric Turlan.
Hosting: ALTEO by Damien Cornillet – Château – 89500
Villeneuve-sur-Yonne. CPPAP no.: 0626 Z 93933.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Follow us on LinkedIn!
Why not connect to the IR Notes LinkedIn page, so that you can keep up with
developments in the issues we’re covering, between two editions?
You’re welcome to follow us! There are already 414 of you following
us!
|
|
|
 |
| |
European Industrial Relations Dictionary
In case reading IR Notes inspires you to
explore this subject further, we are providing links to the European
Industrial Relations Dictionary published by Eurofound. This is updated at
regular intervals by IR Share, which publishes IR Notes. The term
definitions are available in English and can easily be converted
into other languages using on-line translation tools.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Lead
story
Commission
spells out the details of a forthcoming initiative to oversee traineeships
On 28 September, the European Commission launched the second-stage consultation of
European social partners with a view to updating the Quality
Framework for EU Traineeships of 10 March 2014 (see Traineeship). Earlier this
year, on 10 January, it published an Evaluation
of the Quality Framework
(see IR Notes 200).
It then began a public consultation, and on 11 July, launched a first-stage
consultation of European social partners (see press
release). Following these consultations, the Commission has taken the view
that additional measures could be taken at EU level to improve the existing
framework, which defines 21 principles allowing States to guarantee high-quality
traineeships. On 14 June, for its part, the European Parliament called for the
adoption of a directive to strengthen protection for trainees (see IR Notes 211),
thereby agreeing to a trade union demand. The employers, for their part, reject the
idea of any binding instruments and want the Commission to opt for the use of a
stronger Council recommendation. In its consultation document, the Commission warns
that it cannot meet all of the unions’ demands: it cannot impose compulsory
remuneration for traineeships (under TFEU Article
153 para. 5), nor can it grant trainees access to the social protection
applicable to workers as this too, is matter that comes within the sole competence
of Member States (TFEU Article
153 para. 4). Nevertheless, the Commission believes that an EU action should
trigger “an upward social convergence”. The aims here are to combat the possible
abuse of traineeships, enhance their quality and improve access to them. To this
end, it advocates two courses of action: 1/ an update of the (non-binding)
recommendation on the quality framework for traineeships, including monitoring of
Member States’ commitments within the framework of the European Semester; 2/ the
adoption of a binding instrument, such as a directive, to achieve a more effective
application of the measures envisaged. For example, a directive could define what
“abuse of a traineeship” means in practice and fix a maximum duration for a
traineeship (or for the overall duration of several traineeships with the same
employer), to prevent real jobs being replaced by long-term traineeships. It could
incorporate the principle of fair pay, which would ensure that the economic value of
the trainee’s work is appropriately remunerated, taking account of the
apprenticeship/training content and the actual work undertaken, the level of the
tasks and responsibilities involved, and the value and intensity of the work and
working hours in question. The directive could also extend to trainees certain
rights granted to “workers”, but given that the existence of pay is a key element in
the definition of a “worker” within the meaning of EU legislation, unpaid trainees
cannot in principle be regarded as “workers” under EU law. The directive might
therefore introduce a legal obligation to provide trainees with written information
on their training objectives, so long as the trainees in question are deemed to be
“workers” (i.e. they are paid). European social partners have until 9 November to
state their views on this issue, the aim being to achieve a balance between
non-binding measures and a directive, whilst at the same time adhering to the fields
of competence assigned to the Commission by the TFEU. If the social partners abandon
the idea of negotiating on this subject, the Commission will be able to put forward
proposals for a recommendation and a directive by the year end, as announced in its
2023 work programme.
|
1. European
Union
Proposal
Violence and harassment at work :
The Council has adopted its position on a proposal
for a decision inviting Member States to ratify ILO Convention 190 on
violence and harassment (see Harassment and violence at
work).). This decision has yet to be formally adopted by
Parliament (see press
release). The Istanbul Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence
against Women also entered into force, in the EU, on 1 October (see press
release).
|
Legislation
Cross-border telework : A framework
agreement that came into force on 1 July allows a waiver from Article 13
para. 1 a) of Regulation 883/2004, which provides for affiliation to the social
security system of their State of residence, when a worker carries out a substantial
proportion of their work in this State and the rest of it in another State. In the
case of telework, with the employee’s agreement, an employer can therefore submit a
request for the employee to come under the social security legislation of the Member
State in which the employer has their registered office or operational headquarters,
if the employee’s cross-border telework in their State of residence represents less
than 50% of their total working hours (see Telework).. The agreement applies only between
its current 19 signatory countries (see the federal public service website
of the Belgian social security system, which is responsible for monitoring the
agreement).
|
2. Member
States
Germany
Due diligence in the energy sector :
A document on “Potential
human rights risks along supply and value chains in the energy sector” has
been adopted within the framework of the “sectoral dialogue in the energy sector”
established in January 2023, which brings together representatives of companies,
associations, trade unions, civil society organisations and the German Institute of
Human Rights (see press
release). It is coordinated by the Federal Ministry of Labour within the
framework of the National
Action Plan for the Economy and Human Rights. The publication, which
analyses supply chain risks for six sectors (photovoltaic energy, battery storage,
wind energy, natural gas, electricity and hydrogen networks), provides “an initial
benchmark for performing risk assessments within the meaning of the law on due
diligence”, according to the Ministry.
|
Austria
Positive impacts of collective labour agreements
: The trade union GPA has commissioned the Economica
research institute to evaluate the economic effects of collective labour agreements
at individual level (see press
release). This study will strengthen the European Commission’s determination
to raise to 80% the number of employees who are covered by a collective bargaining
agreement, in order to combat low wages. According to the study,
which covers agreements concluded from the third quarter of 2022 through to June
2023, the average wage increase was 8.7%, whereas year-on-year inflation over this
period was 7.75% on average. The study evaluates the difference between the effect
of the increases obtained over this period on an employee’s entire career, compared
to the effect of giving them a one-off payment. It demonstrates that receiving a
general increase is much more advantageous than a one-off payment.
|
Finland
Sustainability report : On 28
September, the government put forward a bill amending the law on
accounting practices, the law on auditing and certain related legislation.
This text transposes Directive
2022/2464 of 14 December 2022 on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence. The
legislation is due to enter into force on 31 December 2023 and to apply from
financial year 2024 onwards, with the first reports being published in 2025, as
provided for by the directive. The bill adapts the directive to the Finnish context,
by including cooperatives within its scope of application, in addition to listed
companies. These cooperatives play an important role in the country’s economy
(see press
release).
|
Greece
Disputed labour law reforms: :
In August, the government put forward bill no. 5053/2023, which
incorporates Directive
2019/1152 of 20 June 2019 on transparent and predictable working conditions in
the EU, which should already have been transposed into domestic law. This
bill also contains a number of provisions that are perceived as an attack on
workers’ rights and working conditions. The bill is facing criticism for
legitimising exploitative practices such as “zero hour contracts”. In addition,
Article 9 of the new bill makes it legal for employees to work for longer than the 8
hours/day limit, by having a second employer. This provision allows a person to do a
full day’s work (8 hours) for one employer and to simultaneously hold a second
part-time job, working for up to 5 hours/day, with a different employer, i.e. to
work for a total of 13 hours during a given 24-hour period. This provision is
nonetheless still compliant with presidential decree no. 88/99, which prescribes a
minimum continuous rest period of 11 hours for workers; this requirement remains
binding. The new provision is designed to take account of a reality in the labour
market, by encouraging workers to declare part-time contracts, rather than
continuing to work on a self-employed basis (a phenomenon associated with undeclared
work and the underground economy). However, other provisions of the bill strengthen
the digital card mechanism, with a view to logging working hours and overtime in
real time. Employers face heavy fines in the event of a discrepancy between the
amount of work actually undertaken and the number of hours registered on a worker’s
card. Lastly, Article 31 of the bill undermines the right to strike, by
criminalising acts that impede unrestricted access for workers arriving at or
leaving their place of work. As a result, anyone who physically or psychologically
intimidates workers who want to work or who participates in workplace occupations
during strikes will be liable for a minimum prison sentence of six months and a fine
of at least 5,000 euros. This new bill therefore introduces several major changes.
While some provisions have been well received, others have aroused debate and
controversy, or have even been firmly opposed by the trade unions (see GSEE
confederation press
release), reflecting the complexity of the challenge of achieving a balance
between flexibility and worker protection in a dynamic labour market.
|
Portugal
Telework allowance : On 21
September, the government announced that telework costs will not be liable for tax
or social security contributions, up to a value of 22 euros per month (i.e. for 22
days’ work). This amount can be increased by 50% (33 euros for 22 days’ work) via a
collective agreement (see press
release).
|
Romania
Towards a law on payment of wages: :
The Ministry of Labour and Social Solidarity is
currently working with World Bank experts, who are providing technical support as it
prepares a law on payment of wages. The aim is to eliminate wage inequality levels
and find ways to boost employees’ performance in every area of the public sector.
The Minister of Labour and Social Solidarity, Simona Bucura-Oprescu, is continuing
to consult with representatives of the authorities and the trade unions (see press
release).
|
3.
Companies
European
Works Councils
Renegotiation : The crop
protection product and seed producer Syngenta (32,761 employees, just
under one half of whom are in Europe) has renewed its Employee
Consultation Council Agreement which, on a number of points, takes its
inspiration from the discussions currently under way on revision of the directive.
The agreement replaces that
of 2010 and remains a so-called pre-directive agreement, which is subject to
Article 13 of the 1994 directive. Decisions taken within one country covered by the
agreement which have material effects on employment relationships in another
country, are a matter within the EWC’s competence. Information and consultation
“shall take place in an appropriate timeframe before a final decision has been
reached to allow the EWC to understand the issue and proposed solutions and come to
an opinion, which may be considered in the decision-making process”. The agreement
explicitly adds care for the environment to the list of subjects that require
consultation. The EWC must receive a reasoned written reply to its opinion from
central management within a reasonable period. To determine how long the procedure
should last, the text refers the reader to a detailed timetable to be agreed on a
case-by-case basis between management and the select committee. On the matter of
confidentiality, the text states that before sharing any confidential information,
management will indicate the reasons for the confidentiality and to which part of
the oral and/or written information confidentiality is applicable, and who is
currently aware of the information. It will also indicate for how long the
information will remain confidential and whether the information can be divulged to
certain persons.
|
Transnational negotiation
- Renewal : The Norwegian
construction group Veidekke (8,500 employees)
has renewed its global framework agreement with the global trade union
federation BWI (see press
release).
|
4. Studies
and reports
Artificial
intelligence
Intelligence artificielle :
Several recent publications throw interesting light on the issue
of AI (see Artificial intelligence).
Eurofound examines the ethical
issues raised by “digitalisation” and their impacts on working conditions and terms
of employment (Ethical
digitalisation at work: From theory to practice). The report highlights the
relevance of collective bargaining at company level for the purpose of achieving
consistency in relation to the ethical needs identified. The OECD has published a theoretical
and practical guide that aims to help stakeholders understand and analyse the impact
of AI in the workplace (Defining
and classifying AI in the workplace). It clarifies the definition of AI and
proposes a classification system for AI systems in light of their workplace impacts.
The initiative prompts consideration of AI’s possible effects: on the volume and
quality of jobs, as well as on the risks of digital exclusion. The ILO looks at the main trends in
changes in employment linked to the use of generative AI software, such as ChatGPT
(Generative
AI and jobs: A global analysis of potential effects on job quantity and
quality). The aim is to assess the extent to which jobs, and their component
tasks, are exposed to the effects of generative AI, both from a quantitative and
qualitative viewpoint. The authors call for particular vigilance with regard to
impacts on the quality of employment, including the aspects of work intensity and
autonomy at work. They also point out areas that call for vigilance, inviting those
in charge to regulate the deployment of these technologies, to ensure that a
dialogue is maintained with employees and to invest in training. Lastly, Cracked
Labs explores how the software marketed by the
German start-up company Celonis works. This software is designed to analyse,
standardise and optimise workflows in order to make them more productive and
efficient, whilst at the same time cutting costs (Monitoring,
streamlining and reorganizing work with digital technology). And to get to
grips with this subject, we recommend a publication produced by the ETUI, which will help with
social dialogue (AI:
discovering the many faces of a faceless technology) and the Guide
to Artificial Intelligence at the workplace published by the European Economic and Social
Committee.
|
|
|