|
| |
IR Notes 220 – 13 December 2023
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
***Everyone in the IR Share team sends our
readers the season’s greetings and wishes them an enjoyable
Christmas break. We’ll be back with IR
Notes
221 on 10
January 2024, after a short winter break. However, you will not
be totally deprived of information in the meantime: we will
continue to post updates on the IR Share website and you can
also follow us on the LinkedIn account.***
|
|
|
 |
| |
A question for…
Aida Ponce Del Castillo, senior researcher at the European Trade Union
Institute (ETUI)
What
impact will the AI regulation have on the world of
work? This regulation doesn’t really have a
work-related dimension. It’s designed to regulate the internal
digital market and to encourage the emergence of European start-ups,
so that they can become major players in terms of global
competition. This leaves very little room for aspects related to the
world of work. The European Parliament has tried to introduce a few
elements providing protection for individuals and fundamental
rights, but the pressure from Member States has been so strong that
the proposals in question, which were already few in number, have
now been changed to the point that they present a risk. For example,
Parliament called for, and secured, a ban on AI technologies based
on emotion recognition, including in the workplace, but they can
still be deployed for safety reasons. This type of exception, if
maintained in the final version, opens up the way to dangerous forms
of abuse. We’re not even sure that Parliament’s amendment obliging
employers to inform and consult their workers when AI systems are
introduced in their company, has been maintained. Once again, the priority of this text is not
to regulate relationships between AI and human beings, and workers
in particular. The protection they enjoy will come in part from the
provisions of the regulation that relate to impact assessments
focusing on fundamental rights and, in parallel, from two other
mechanisms that concern the world of work: firstly occupational
health and safety risk assessment, and secondly, the impact
assessment provided by the GDPR as soon as an employer processes employees’
personal data. Another
essential instrument is the 2020 European framework agreement on
digitalisation, which contains two very important chapters: one on
AI which guarantees the principle of “human in control”, the other
on respect for human dignity and surveillance. The social partners
have moved faster than the European institutions. So we must now
apply what is already in existence, and in the near future,
elaborate and adopt an ad hoc European directive on AI in
the workplace.
>
See also : article
in Social Europe.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Diary
6
February On line
European Works Council Club meeting and presentation, by
Michelin’s industrial relations department, of a study of how the
company’s European Works Council operates. Contact: frederic.t@irshare.eu
25 to 28 March
Paris Franco-German
seminar for European and SE Works Councils, organised by EWC
Academy in cooperation with Ultra Laborans and IR Share, which will lead
the proceedings on 26 March, a day devoted to revision of the European
Works Council directive and to exchanges of practice between German and
French representatives sitting on EWCs.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Who we are?
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and its
network of experts, and is available in several European languages
(English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). It offers Europe-wide
monitoring of employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It
is available by subscription for 260 euros per year .
The team This issue
was producaed by Pascale Turlan
and
Frédéric
Turlan. Find out more about the IR Share
team on our website.
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calliang us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95
or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
Legal notice.
Publisher: IR Share SARL – 5, Les Compères – 89520 Fontenoy, France –
Tel.: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 – share capital 1,500 euros – commercial
register (RCS Auxerre): 512 567 959. Managing editor: Frédéric Turlan.
Hosting: ALTEO by Damien Cornillet – Château – 89500
Villeneuve-sur-Yonne. CPPAP no.: 0626 Z 93933.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Please support us!
If you’re reading this newsletter,
it means you are either an IR Notes subscriber yourself or you
belong to one of our subscriber organisations. It may also have
been passed on to you by someone who is a
subscriber. In
some ways this is good news, as we aim to reach as many readers as
possible, but it also means we are missing out on revenue. As you
are aware, an independent quality publication comes at a cost, as
does its translation into the four languages offered by IR Notes.
For this reason, we need your cooperation: please do not distribute
IR Notes to other readers, or at least do so only occasionally, and
above all please ensure you subscribe to our publication. IR Notes
is wholly dependent on the revenue it earns from its subscribers. It
does not receive subsidies of any kind, and has no other sources of
funding. It is therefore vital for us to maximise our subscriber
numbers to ensure the continuation of IR Notes. You can help us by
telling others about IR Notes, distributing our brochure, subscribing to our publication if you are
not already doing so, and of course renewing your subscription or
arranging for your organisation to take out a subscription to IR
Notes. Thank you!
|
|
|
 |
| |
Follow us on LinkedIn!
Why not connect to the IR Notes LinkedIn page, so that you can keep up with
developments in the issues we’re covering, between two editions?
You’re welcome to follow us! There are already 486 of you following
us!
|
|
|
 |
| |
European Industrial Relations Dictionary
In case reading IR Notes inspires you to
explore this subject further, we are providing links to the European
Industrial Relations Dictionary published by Eurofound. This is updated at
regular intervals by IR Share, which publishes IR Notes. The term
definitions are available in English and can easily be converted
into other languages using on-line translation tools.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Lead
story
This AI
regulation is historic, but offers little protection for workers
Two and a half years after the European Commission put forward its proposal
for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence
(see IR Notes 163),
on 8 December, representatives of the Twenty-Seven, in conjunction with the Spanish
Presidency of the EU, the European Parliament and the Commission, reached agreement
on this text, which will now have to be formally adopted by the Council and
Parliament, before it is published (see Artificial intelligence).
Everyone will therefore have to wait a few more weeks or even months before a
consolidated text is published. “This is a historic day” proclaimed Thierry Breton,
European Commissioner for Internal Market: “the EU is the first region of the world
to legislate on the use of AI, with a draft text whose adoption was disrupted by the
sudden emergence of generative AI.” The text maintains the risk‑based approach,
which involves identifying high-risk AI systems, whose use requires specific
oversight, while the most dangerous forms of AI are simply banned. The regulation
lists the following types of AI as “high-risk”: AI used for recruitment and
selection purposes, for determining access to training or making decisions on
promotion and termination in work-related contractual relationships, for task
allocation and for monitoring and evaluation of employee performance and behaviour.
The Commission can amend this list by means of delegated acts. The fact that an AI
system features in this classification gives rise to obligations, both for AI
designers (“suppliers”) and for “users” of AI. However, workers will enjoy greater
protection from the existing legislation, which requires employers to inform and
consult employee representatives when a new technology is introduced, or requires
risk analyses to be performed regarding health and safety aspects, and for
situations involving the processing of personal data. “The risk-based approach
provides some protection but given the impact of AI on millions of workers, what we
need is a dedicated directive on AI in the workplace”, says Aida Ponce Del Castillo,
a researcher at the ETUI (see A question for…). Today’s
adoption of the proposal for a Platform Work Directive (see press
release) by Parliament, the Council and the Commission, also argues in
favour of expanding the protection provided against algorithmic management to
include all workers (see Algorithmic management).
|
> > > Last
minute
This week, on 13 December, the European Council and Parliament reached agreement on
the proposal for a directive on the working conditions of platform workers (see press
release). The European Commission is also due to put forward its proposal
for revision of the European Works Council Directive, on 16 January next year.
|
1. European
Union
Legislation
Exposure to asbestos : Directive
2023/2668 of 22 November 2023 amending Directive 2009/148/EC on the protection
of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work was
published in the OJEU of 30 November (see IR Notes 212). The
directive must be adopted into domestic law no later than 21 December 2025.
|
Proposal
“Net-zero” industry : On 7
December, the Council adopted its position (General
approach) on the “net-zero” industry regulation, which aims to speed up the
industrial roll-out of technologies supporting the transition to climate neutrality.
It calls for European industries to produce at least 40% of the annual deployment
needs for the corresponding technologies necessary to achieve the Union’s 2030
climate and energy targets (Article 9a). As this target involves a major training
and reskilling effort, the regulation provides for the establishment of “European
Net-Zero Industry Academies” to “develop education and training programmes, content
and materials, as well as the credentials showing that these have been used, to
upskill and reskill people of all working ages required for key net-zero technology
value chains” (see press
release).
|
Bus and coach drivers’ working hours :
On 4 December, the Council adopted its position
(see press
release) on the proposal
for revision of Regulation
no. 561/2006, presented by the European Commission on 24 May 2023, on
relaxation of the rules governing bus and coach drivers’ minimum daily breaks and
rest periods, which are currently subject to the same rules as lorry drivers. The
text is supported by the employers (see IRU press
release), but has been criticised by the European trade union federation ETF
(see press
release).
|
Social
update
Green negotiations : At the
latest Employment and Social Affairs Council meeting, held on 27 November, Ministers
of Employment exchanged views on a discussion
guidance note of the Spanish Presidency of the EU on green collective
bargaining. Two questions were on the agenda: 1/ How can collective
bargaining support the fight against climate change, increase environmental
sustainability and accompany a fair transition towards climate neutrality? 2/ While
respecting the autonomy of the social partners, what measures could be taken by the
Union, Member States and social partners themselves to promote green collective
bargaining? The note emphasises that green collective bargaining could include
“information and consultation of workers through the appointment of representatives
on green transition or their participation in specialised committees”. It also calls
for better “environmental training of the negotiating parties of collective
agreements” (see press
release).
|
Democracy at work : At the
latest Employment and Social Affairs Council meeting, held on 27 November, for the
first time, Ministers of Employment adopted conclusions
relating to strengthening democracy at work, under the impetus of the
Spanish Presidency of the EU, led by the Minister of Employment, Yolanda Diaz. The
text emphasises that “from the outset, strategic decisions may benefit from the
involvement of workers in corporate decision-making processes, thus mitigating the
risk of future conflicts”. It calls for “effective enforcement of information and
consultation rights” to accompany digitalisation processes and for “the use of
artificial intelligence and algorithms in work organisation and labour relations”.
The conclusions call on Member States to “share experiences and the good practices
of national and European mechanisms for workers’ participation in companies’
administrative, management or supervisory bodies”. For its part, the European
Commission must “reflect on the need and relevance of EU law developments regarding
worker participation in companies, in particular transnational companies”, for
instance by revising the legislation governing European companies, European
cooperative societies and cross-border operations, so that it “does not circumvent
or undermine workers’ participation rights”.
|
Mental health : On 30 November,
European Ministers of Health adopted conclusions
on mental health, which invite Member States to prevent “mental problems
(including suicide, self-harm and depression) in different contexts such as (…)
workplaces (…), including a mix of universal, selective and indicated preventive
interventions and policy measures”. They are also invited to ensure “the effective
application of existing EU and national legislation to guarantee safety and health
at work and promoting mental health, prevention and managing psychosocial risks and
strengthening mental health resources in the workplace” (see press
release).
|
Revision of the European Works Council directive
: On 30 November, the European employers’ organisation
BusinessEurope published its key
messages to the European Commission, which is due to put forward an
initiative on European Works Councils at the start of next year. This document sets
out the main points of a position
adopted the same day, which is consistent with the viewpoints already expressed
during the phases of consultation with social partners.
|
Case law
Religious neutrality : In a case
concerning the Commune d’Ans in Belgium, the Court of Justice upheld religious
neutrality policies in force at local authorities, which allow a municipality to ban
any of its staff from wearing any visible signs which might reveal their religious
beliefs, regardless of whether they are in contact with the public (see Discrimination on the grounds of religion
or belief). The judgment also echoes a recent news story: a
resolution passed by the municipal council of Anderlecht – a municipality within the
Brussels conurbation – which approves the principle of allowing visible signs of
beliefs to be worn by holders of all positions within its administration, adding
that the same may also apply to “the choice of another public administration,
depending on that administration’s own context and within the framework of its
competences, in favour of another policy of neutrality, such as a general and
undifferentiated permission for the wearing of visible signs of beliefs –
philosophical or religious in particular – including in contacts with users, or a
prohibition on the wearing of such signs limited to situations involving such
contacts”. (CJEU,
28 November 2023, Case C-148/22, Commune d’Ans) (see press
release).
- European company: On 7
December, the Advocate General of the Court of Justice delivered his opinion
on the formation of a special negotiating body within the German group works
council of the Japanese company Olympus for the purpose of negotiating an
agreement on employee involvement, following the creation of a European company
(SE) that was clearly set up for the purpose of abolishing the participation of
one third of employee representatives at this German subsidiary. The Court of
Justice is invited to rule that the arrangements put in place by Olympus comply
with EU law, unless it can demonstrate that the SE has been misused.
|
Cross-industry social dialogue
Telework and the right to disconnect :
Following the breakdown of negotiations on
telework and the right to disconnect, the employers’ organisation SGI Europe has
declared that “this negative outcome must serve as a lesson for us all” (see Newsflash of
1 December). “We now need a genuine commitment from all parties concerned –
employers, trade unions and institutions – so that we can reinvigorate social
dialogue”, explains Valeria Ronzitti, Secretary General of SGI Europe. The
organisation calls on the Commission “to take inspiration from the compromises which
were reached amongst social partners”, based on the Framework
Agreement reached by negotiators for their final meeting on 9 November,
which SGI Europe was prepared to put to its members for a vote.
|
Sectoral
social dialogue
- Steel industry : In a joint
statement issued on 27 November, European steel social partners commit
to working towards a competitive transition of the European steel sector (see
press releases issued by IndustriAll Europe
and Eurofer).
|
- Railway sector : European
social partners in the railway sector have conducted a review of the application
of their autonomous agreement designed to promote employment of women in the
rail industry, which was signed on 5 November 2021 (see IR Notes 174).
According to the employers’ organisation CER, 91.5% of workers employed by CER
member companies are now covered by a comprehensive gender equality policy,
which is ensured by this agreement (see press
release).
|
2. Member
States
Austria
Climate bureau : This summer,
the Austrian trade union confederation ÖGB set up an internal “climate bureau“, which in future will
coordinate the ÖGB’s energy and climate policy-related activities and develop
instruments to support employees and works councils in the transformation process
(see press
release).
|
Denmark
Cost of work-related stress :
The National Centre for Research into the Working Environment
has published the results of a survey of more than 52,000 Danish employees,
concerning their exposure to stress. The study, which estimates the cost of stress
at 16.4 billion crowns (2.1 billion euros) per year and 61.9 million lost working
hours (equivalent to 37,335 employees withdrawing from the labour market),
emphasises that “prolonged stress is a dangerous companion, who is becoming familiar
to increasing numbers of people” (see press
release).
> See
also: press
release issued by the trade union confederation FH which, given the amounts
of money involved here, calls for investment in prevention.
|
Working conditions of migrants employed in the
building industry : Aalborg University has published a research
report, commissioned by the 3F trade union, on the working environment of
migrant workers in the construction sector. The report, which includes more than 80
interviews and is 350 pages long, is a benchmark for research in this area, at both
a Danish and a European level. According to 3F, migrant workers in this sector are
living in “appalling conditions. They are systematically doing the most dangerous,
the most exhausting and the dirtiest jobs. Accidents at work are seldom reported,
wages are not paid and there are stories of threats of violence and human
trafficking” (see press
release).
|
Spain
More women on company boards :
On 5 December, the Council of Ministers approved the framework
bill on equal representation and gender balance, which transposes Directive
2022/2381 on improving the gender balance among directors of listed companies. At
the present time, women account for 29.3% of company directors, and this figure
falls to just 19.6% in the case of senior executives. The bill requires women to
account for no less than 40% of the total number of board members (see press
release).
|
Finland
Right to strike : The government
has announced the adoption of a draft law on “social peace” in February 2024,
regulating the right to strike. Having already undertaken a public consultation, the
government now plans to conduct a number of other consultations before that date
(see press
release). The three trade unions SAK, Akava and STTK condemn the plan and
the absence of sufficient dialogue with the unions (see press
release).
|
France
Three cross-industry negotiations :
On 21 November, the government sent the social partners a policy
paper “on the New Deal for Working Life”, inviting them to commence
negotiations on three subjects: the universal working time account, employment of
workers aged over 50 (with a view to increasing the employment rate of this
demographic) and career paths (for adapting to the green, digital and demographic
transitions). The Ministry of Employment says that the aim is for cross-industry
agreements to be reached by 15 March 2024. The universal working time account will
enable each member of the workforce to benefit, throughout their career, from a
mechanism allowing them to accrue leave or rest time, and to subsequently use this
time to help manage their career and private life.
|
Due diligence plan : For the
first time, a company has been found guilty of breaching French law on due
diligence, which requires groups of a certain size to prepare a due diligence plan.
One of the orders contained in the ruling
handed down to La Poste by the Paris court is an instruction to “draw up procedures
for evaluating subcontractors, based on the specific risks identified by
risk-mapping”, in order to take into account the working conditions of delivery
workers employed by its subcontractors, who are often undocumented persons,
according to the Sud-PTT trade union, which brought the case (see press
release).
|
3.
Companies
European
Works Council
Transnational restructuring : On
18 September, the National Labour Court of Madrid handed down its ruling
on the complaint filed by the EWC of the airlines group IAG against IAG management, for
failing to inform and consult the European Works Council over its proposal to
dismiss 12,000 British Airways employees and 500 Aer Lingus employees in 2020, in
response to the drop in business linked to Covid-19. The court holds that failing to
inform the European Works Council prevented the EWC from receiving the information
it needed from IAG in order to evaluate the employment measures adopted and their
possible impact on the group’s entire workforce. However, the court also takes the
view that the criteria required for opening a consultation procedure were not met,
in light of the provisions of the European Works Council agreement. The text states
that a matter is transnational in nature when it affects more than 25 workers (in
more than one EU country) or more than 50% of workers in a single country. Jonathan
Hayward, the international delegate of the British trade union Unite the Union,
says: “The European Works Council has appealed the decision, so that it can also be
granted the right to be consulted”, (see European Trade Union Confederation press release).
|
Transnational negotiation
Corporate Social Responsibility: :
On 4 December, the French group Safran (83,000 employees), which
supplies parts to the aircraft industry, and the IndustriAll Global Union federation
renewed their corporate social
responsibility global framework agreement. Changes in relation to the previous
agreement include an article on climate change, plus a number of indicators,
some of which will be specifically developed in order to monitor application of the
agreement, such as the percentage of the workforce with access to employee
representation bodies on their site or at their subsidiary (see press releases
issued by IndustriAll
Global Union and Safran.
|
|
|