IR Notes

Working together to build a social Europe

An independent, reliable and impartial source of information on industrial relations and labour law in Europe.

IR Notes 267 – An appeal for businesses to be democratised

  IR Notes 267 – 11 February 2026
www.irshare.eu
 
 
  A question for…
Isabelle Ferreras, Research Director at FNRS, Research Associate at Harvard and Oxford, and Professor of Sociology at the Catholic University of Louvain

The report on democracy at work, published by the committee of experts chaired by you, (see Lead story) advocates granting European works councils a co-decision right covering artificial intelligence. Why?
In its mission letter, the Spanish government asked us to broaden our thinking on democracy at work to a European scale. Clearly, the existence of EWCs constitutes major progress in terms of social Europe. However, this progress would be even greater if these bodies were able to exercise a genuine co-decision right over issues that really matter. For example, the most influential factor affecting employees’ working conditions in today’s world is the deployment of artificial intelligence tools. The AI systems being rolled out at the present time come with important consequences for employees’ working life, affecting access to jobs, work organisation and performance evaluation, extending right through to retirement. In a society like Spain, which enshrines workers’ involvement in the decision-making process as a constitutional value, it’s simply inconceivable that workers should be denied a say on the deployment of systems that govern them. So we suggested transposing to European level what we’re advocating at national level: a right to “shape and consent” to AI. The aim is prevent workers being downgraded to a passive role and forced to issue an opinion in haste, once a tool is ready to be deployed. From a democratic viewpoint, it’s vital that they should be allowed to take part in the design of AI systems at an upstream stage. This assumes that they fully grasp the ins and outs of the mechanisms about to be imposed on them: how they work, what they’re producing, what they’re changing, etc. And it also means having the option of saying ‘no’, or consenting – collectively – to their use. So we’re also proposing that this new right granted to EWCs should be supplemented by the right to be accompanied by an artificial intelligence expert, whose costs will be paid by the company. Taking such a step would prevent pointless stand-offs and stalemate situations arising. These tensions are frequently interpreted as the workforce adopting a conservative posture, but in reality they result from employees having to use tools they don’t understand, yet also knowing very well that these tools are in control of them.

 
  Agenda

 


12 and 13 February
Lefkosia (Cyprus)
Informal meeting of European Ministers of Employment


3 and 4 March
Brussels
4th European Employment and Social Rights Forum,
organised by the European Commission, on the theme of:
Social Europe: Empowering people in times of uncertainty.


4 March
Brussels
The European Commission is due to adopt its 2026-2030 gender equality strategy and its intergenerational fairness strategy


9 March
Brussels
Employment and Social Affairs Council


18 March
Brussels
Tripartite Social Summit


29 June
Luxembourg
Employment and Social Affairs Council

 
  Who we are?

 


IR Notes is a fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and its network of experts, and is available in several European languages (English, French, German, Italian, Spanish, Polish). It offers Europe-wide monitoring of employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It is available by subscription for 273 euros per year .


The team: This issue was producaed by Inès Bollet, Victoria Fonseca, Ambre Grenier-Boley, Laura Renucci, Frédéric Turlan and Iris Turlan. Find out more about the IR Share team on our website.


Subscribe to IR Notes Via the IR Share website or by calling us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 or
E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu


Legal notice. Publisher: IR Share SARL – 5, Les Compères – 89520 Fontenoy, France – Tel.: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 – share capital 1,500 euros – commercial register (RCS Auxerre): 512 567 959. Managing editor: Frédéric Turlan. Hosting: ALTEO by Damien Cornillet – Château – 89500 Villeneuve-sur-Yonne. CPPAP no.: 0626 Z 93933.

 
  Follow us on LinkedIn!

Why not connect to the IR Notes LinkedIn page, so that you can keep up with developments in the issues we’re covering, between two editions? You’re welcome to follow us! There are already 779 of you following us!

 

IR Share is a privately- owned, independent, apolitical company whose aim is to inform and assist all players involved in social dialogue within and outside Europe. It has been the correspondent organisation for France of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions since 2009.

 

Lead story
An appeal for businesses to be democratised

On 5 February, the International High-level Expert Committee on Democracy at Work submitted its report to Yolanda Díaz, the Spanish Minister of Labour and Social Economy (see press release, executive summary and comprehensive summary). Some of what appears in the report on democracy at work will mark a milestone and should encourage debate, not just in Spain, but across the EU. This committee, chaired by Belgian sociologist Isabelle Ferreras, (see ‘A question for…’) was tasked with putting Article 129.2 of the Spanish Constitution – which describes the various forms of worker participation in a company, cooperatives and access for workers to owning the means of production – into practice. The Minister’s view is that the task of implementing this principle remains unfinished, as no legislation was subsequently passed to create any form of financial participation or employee representation on company boards (see IR Notes 247). The committee notes that Spain is “among the least developed countries in the European Union in terms of the recognition of workers as key constituents of the economy”. The report recommends “firm democratization” as a means of enacting the provisions of Article 129.2 and “opening a path for all labour investors”, i.e. workers, “to access voice and ownership”. As justification for the need to position citizens at the heart of a business, the experts provide “factual evidence and robust economic and political arguments to explain the necessity of public intervention in this direction”. While this article of the Constitution has something of a Marxist feel to it, the authors show that democratisation within a business can now offer a response that is more pertinent than ever to the many challenges posed by the Spanish economy, and to those inherent in one-legged capitalism, which serves only the interests of shareholders, while destroying the nine planetary boundaries one by one. In a country like Spain, where three quarters of its surface area is now at risk of desertification, the message is a highly pertinent one. The experts advocate tackling the situation in two ways. The first way is to strengthen workers’ voice, by introducing a co-decision right for workforce representatives, and ensuring that workers have a presence on company boards. The second one aims to make it easier for workers to access ownership of the means of production: by opening up the share capital of companies to their employees; by drawing up transition plans that will allow workers to acquire their companyʼs shares in anticipation of a founder or ownerʼs retirement; and by creating funds that will enable citizens to acquire shares. The authors argue that this would make “Spanish firms more resilient, and less dependent on extractive financial actors”. Furthermore, and this is an innovation in the report, echoing EU debates on revision of public procurement rules, the authors suggest creating a reporting tool – the Corporate Democratic Development Index – based on two scoring scales measuring workers’ access to the decision-making process and to capital. Depending on their level of democratisation, the score achieved by companies could be used by the authorities as an incentive-based mechanism, using the bonus/malus principle, to access public subsidies, corporate tax rates, fiscal benefits, privileged access to public procurement, etc. It is now up to the Spanish social partners to discuss these proposals, as promised by Yolanda Díaz, who is hoping for an agreement, failing which the Sanchez government will have to move forward on the basis of its commitment to legislate during this Parliament.


1. European Union
Social update

28th regime : On 20 January, by a large majority, MEPs adopted a series of recommendations relating to the European Commission’s proposal for a new legal framework designed to support businesses in the EU, commonly known as the “28th regime” (see European Parliament resolution, briefing and At a Glance). This regime involves creating the status of a Societas Europaea Unificata (S.EU) [‘unified European company’], which would apply to unlisted limited liability companies established in one of the 27 EU Member States. The registration of such a company would be an entirely digital process, so that it could be completed within 48 hours, with a minimum paid-up share capital requirement of just one euro. To attract and retain top talent at S.EUs, it is likely that employee stock ownership plans and employee stock options will be introduced. Parliament’s recommendations concerning the 28th regime for EU businesses look set to be included in a legislative proposal drawn up by the Commission, which is expected during the first quarter of 2026. In his report, MEP René Repasi (S&D) tries to limit the risk of reducing worker protection in the areas of labour law and rights relating to worker participation in company decision-making processes, where such rights exist. Although it was originally designed to facilitate the creation of EU start-up companies, the 28th regime no longer seems to be subject to any limits in terms of company size. This change makes the European Trade Union Confederation very wary of this piece of legislation, which, in the Commission’s proposal expected on 16 March, might also impose a limitation on workers’ rights (see press release).



Subcontracting : On 12 February, the European Parliament is due to vote on the motion for a resolution on “addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights”, presented by Johan Danielsson (S&D). The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs has already approved this by 35 votes in favour and 20 against. The text invites the Commission to “end abusive subcontracting and to protect workers’ rights, to strengthen transparency and accountability throughout the supply chain, and to consider introducing a well-defined regime for the joint and several liability of economic operators and subcontractors”. It also calls on the Commission to assess “the impact of public contracts being performed mainly by the successful tenderer’s direct workers and recommends that public procurement rules encourage companies to have sufficient in-house staff to implement the projects for which they are awarded public contracts”.



Restructuring : On 6 February, the European Commission announced a proposal to mobilise 3.7 million euros from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to help 416 workers dismissed following the bankruptcy of the home decoration company Casa in Belgium (1.9 million euros) and 420 workers dismissed by the motorcycle manufacturer KTM in Austria (1.8 million euros) (see press release).


Cross-industry social dialogue

Quality jobs : The European Commission has received replies from the main European social partners to the first phase consultation on the Quality Jobs Act, launched on 4 December (see IR Notes 264). The proposal for a job quality directive is due to be presented by the year end, following a second phase consultation with European social partners, under Article 154 TFEU. These partners are clearly divided in their contributions. On the one hand, the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) is calling for binding legislation on all topics covered by the consultation: algorithmic management and artificial intelligence in the workplace, protection against psychosocial and ergonomic risks in the workplace; the right to disconnect; abusive subcontracting practices; a just transition with the creation of a personal training entitlement, etc. (see ETUC reply). Moreover, having had its fingers burned in 2023 by the breakdown of cross-industry negotiations on telework and the right to disconnect, the ETUC rules out the idea of reaching any negotiated solution with European employers’ organisations, as it “does not consider that the necessary conditions currently exist to initiate a dialogue.” Although the issues raised by the Commission are widely recognised, the employers, for their part, believe that the solutions required are completely different from those advocated by the ETUC. The employers’ organisation BusinessEurope rejects the idea of a purely legislative approach – other than for the purpose of simplifying the existing legislation (see contribution). It advocates non-binding initiatives for all topics tackled in the consultation, and calls for the existing rules to be applied properly: “the answer lies in strengthening labour inspectorates and other relevant players” to deter “fraudulent activities and potential abuses through enforcement”. Moreover, taking the opposite view to the ETUC, BusinessEurope explains that it is ready “to further explore the possibility of initiating a social dialogue on one or several of the issues mentioned in the consultation document”. Both SGI Europe (reply) and SME United (reply) also leave open the possibility of negotiation between European social partners, which could be incorporated into the multi-annual work programme currently under preparation.


2. Member States
Germany

Working hours : The CDU party, led by Chancellor Friedrich Merz, wants to revise working hours legislation and to restrict workers’ rights in the area of part-time working. Since 2001, companies with more than 15 employees have had to agree, subject to certain conditions, to requests for shorter working hours submitted by employees who have at least 6 months’ service. The Chancellor’s party wants to limit this piece of legislation to particular situations, such as childcare and vocational training. This initiative has been criticised by some trade unions, including the DGB Trade Union Confederation and IG Metall (see press release). It marks a change of direction in the country’s employment policy, and aims to get Germans back to work, through longer working hours and clamping down on abuses of sick leave.


Finland

Democracy at work : The Conservative government is launching a public consultation on legislative amendments aimed at increasing board‑level employee representation. The government wants the regulation on board-level employee representation to apply to companies with at least 100 employees, rather than the current figure of 150. “We want employees to have a stronger voice in Finnish workplaces”, says Minister of Employment Matias Marttinen, who believes that the measure “will bring as many as 100,000 additional employees within the scope” of the regulation on board-level employee representation. He emphasises that “companies that already have this type of employee representation report mostly positive experiences” (see press release).


France

Retraining : Following the enactment of Law no. 2025-989 of 24 October 2025 transposing domestic cross-industry agreements to promote the employment of experienced workers and relating to the evolution of social dialogue, the “retraining period” scheme entered into force on 1 February 2026 and replaces the previous schemes covering “Collective transitions” and “sandwich courses for retraining or promotion”. The new scheme is open to all employees who are seeking mobility inside or outside their company, with a view to gaining certification or skills, and it can also operate at the employer’s initiative. Two decrees were published on 28 January 2026, to clarify certain points of the legislation, notably regarding its implementation and funding.


Netherlands

Employee monitoring : The data protection authority has prohibited the UK transport company Arriva from continuously filming its bus drivers, by reminding all road transport companies operating in the passengers or goods sectors, of the principles governing use of CCTV (see press release). CCTV can be used for security purposes, but not to monitor employees. The CNV trade union welcomes this decision and calls on its members and other companies to carefully re-examine their rules governing CCTV use (see press release).


Slovakia

New family leave arrangements : On 1 January, the Labour Code was amended by Law 406/2025 on help for dependants (see press release). The text broadens leave entitlements to include employees who are encountering “major personal obstacles in performing their work duties”. For example, an employee is granted seven days of leave per year to accompany a child who is aged under 15 and attending medical examinations or appointments at institutions for children or pupils with disabilities. The law also grants a further seven days of leave, which can be taken cumulatively with the first seven days, to employees who are single parents accompanying a family member, including a child, undergoing examinations or treatment at a healthcare establishment in the event of a sudden illness or accident, or attending a specialised institution for children or pupils with disabilities.


3. Companies
European Works Councils

Older workers : On 26 January, the Spanish textile group Inditex and its EWC signed a joint statement on the measures necessary to address the employment of middle-aged people and support age diversity. The text highlights eight objectives or measures that could be adopted to take “the work and professional experience of those who make up their workforce, and especially its older members” into account more effectively. These measures include a desire to tackle ageing-related risks “using a global approach, including both physical and psychosocial aspects”, and a commitment by the group to evaluate, at “local level, and taking account of the characteristics of each market, ways of adapting the jobs of people whose abilities have been affected by ageing, where this has a significant impact on how they carry out their duties”, e.g. by making changes to their working hours or working day.



Restructuring : The European management of steelmaker ArcelorMittal has announced a new plan involving the massive relocation of support functions, which will put at risk 5,600 jobs in 20 countries, even though a similar plan is still ongoing, according to a statement issued by the EWC, following an extraordinary meeting held on 29 January, via videoconferencing. “This decision constitutes a new frontal attack on European workers, without any assessment or evaluation and without consideration for the human, social and industrial consequences”, says the statement, with particular reference to workers employed by the company’s subcontractors. Workers’ representatives are demanding an immediate halt to any further relocations until the first wave has been completed and evaluated; retention of key skills, particularly IT skills, in Europe is “a genuine European industrial strategy that respects jobs and workers”. EWC secretary Jean-Luc Ruffin expresses doubts about the legal validity of the information-consultation process, which looks more like a consultation on a framework, paving the way for a series of restructurings, without the matter having to be referred back to the EWC for consultation.

 


Désabonnement

IR Notes

An introduction

IR Notes is an independent, reliable and balanced briefing note on industrial relations and labour law in Europe.

Published in 6 languages and sold by subscription, this newsletter gives you access to concise, targeted and practical information on the major themes of both social Europe and transnational social dialogue.

With our experts and national correspondents, we adopt a dynamic, practical and useful approach to European social monitoring.

As a result, we select the most relevant topics, which are a source of cross-disciplinary and inspiring ideas.

Each issue includes:

  • An interview with someone working in the field of industrial relations who offers their unique take on a current social issue, an agreement, or an example of best practice.
  • Updates on EU legislative and case law developments.
  • Monitoring of labour law developments in EU Member States.
  • Updates on the latest developments concerning European Works Councils and SE Works Councils.
  • Lastly, IR Notes keeps you informed about the main studies and research carried out on the world of work.

IR Notes
Building a social Europe together

The IR Notes newsletter gives everyone in Europe access to an independent, reliable and impartial source of information on topics involving industrial relations

Three questions for Delphine Rudelli

Three questions for Delphine Rudelli

Three questions for Delphine Rudelli, Director General of CEEMET (*) On the delays in transposing the ‘pay transparency’ directive “We are calling for the application of the directive to be suspended while we assess what can be simplified – not to reduce rights, but...

read more...
European Union – Social update

European Union – Social update

European Works Councils The Expert Group set up by the European Commission to help Member States transpose the new Directive (EU) 2025/2450 on European Works Councils is due to submit its report this summer. This report may constitute a useful point of reference when...

read more...
A step in coordination of national social security systems

A step in coordination of national social security systems

At last, a step forward for freedom of movement for workers in the EU On 22 April, representatives of the Council and Parliament reached a provisional agreement on revising the rules on coordination of national social security systems, as provided for by regulation...

read more...
Picture of Nora Krokovay

A question for… Nora Krokovay

A question for…Nora Krokovay, Senior Analyst at Kopint-Tárki What changes can we expect in terms of social dialogue and labour law in Hungary following the elections that brought an end to Viktor Orbán’s 16-year leadership? The atmosphere was very euphoric and joyful...

read more...
Improvements in job quality

Improvements in job quality

Eurofound notes improvements in job quality in Europe Now that the European Commission has announced its intention to present a bill on job quality by the year end, the results of the latest European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) will be scrutinised very...

read more...
Is pay transparency the new enemy to be targeted?

Is pay transparency the new enemy to be targeted?

After seeing off the corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence directives, Member States appear ready to tackle the pay transparency directive, which is due to be transposed in Member States by 7 June 2026.Not only are many countries behind schedule, but a...

read more...
A question to… Lidia Gil Otero

A question to… Lidia Gil Otero

A question for…Lidia Gil Otero, PhD Assistant Professor in Labour and Social Security Law at Santiago de Compostela University In the context of the Digilare project (*), you advocate using the transposition of the Platform Work Directive, which is due to be completed...

read more...