|
| |
IR Notes 102 – 18 July 2018
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
Who we are?
IR
Share is a provider that shares
information, documentation and expertise for HR managers and employee
representatives. The IR Share agency operates by way of online
publications, working groups, training devoted to relevant topics and a
network of experts.
The team This issue
was produced by Sylvain Nadalet and Frédéric Turlan. Find out more
about the IR Share
team on our website
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95
or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
|
|
|
 |
| |
A message to our readers
IR Notes is going on holiday 😉
The whole team will be back with IR Notes n° 103 on 12 September. We hope
that you’ll have a good holiday and enjoy a break from work. As a
reminder, for the first time, the Advocate General of the EU Court of
justice has submitted a proposal to the Court that the entitlement to
paid annual leave should be described as one of the “fundamental social
rights” enshrined in Article 31, paragraph 2, of the EU Charter of
Fundamental Rights. If the Court accepts his opinion, the practical
consequence would be that this right could be invoked directly within
the framework of a dispute between an employee and a private sector
employer, to set aside the application of domestic provisions whose
effect is to deprive a worker of his/her right to a period of paid
annual leave. So, please make good use of your future “fundamental
social right”. Having said that, even while IR Notes is taking its
summer break, we remain at your disposal (contact@irshare.eu – + 33 (0) 6
81 41 53 95). If your workload is slightly reduced during the summer
season, please don’t hesitate to contact us directly to offer your
suggestions, criticisms, advice, etc. or to send your ideas for the
future development of IR Notes. We can initiate a dialogue via a Skype
call. With this aim in mind, please feel free to send an email to frederic.t@irshare.eu and
we’ll take time to discuss the matter, so that IR Notes can meet your
needs as closely as possible.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Editorial
Your IR Notes newsletter, founded in 2014, has celebrated its 100th
edition!
We said that we wanted to report
the news in the field of European social affairs, in a way that
is accessible to those engaged in social dialogue, especially
within multinational companies, and that’s precisely what we’ve
done! Once a fortnight, IR Notes informs and educates more than
1,000 readers across the European Union.
Why IR
Notes? IR
Notes exists to provide a brief and educational overview of
developments in European social affairs, presented in English,
German, Spanish, French, and Italian since the start of
2018, with a view to facilitating
exchanges concerning European practice in this area. We want IR
Notes to be a tool that will help turn the idea of “a social Europe”
into a reality, because this project will come to fruition through
the efforts of the actors engaged in building it, at all
levels.
Who are
we? IR Notes
is written by a team of industrial relations experts from EU Member
States. It is coordinated by Frédéric Turlan, who trained as an
expert in employment law, and has almost 20 years’ experience in the
field of social legislation and industrial relations in Europe. In
IR Notes, he decodes key information, while at the same time trying
to make it comprehensible to a wide audience. The newsletter is
translated by professional translators: the BENAVIDES agency (English, German), CIT (Spanish) and
Rosanna Gasbarro (Italian).
Are we
independent? IR Notes is published by IR Share, a totally
independent private company, which has no links whatsoever to any
employers’ organisations or trade unions, nor to any political
groupings, think tanks or commercial companies that might want to
offer products or services to the readers of IR Notes. IR Notes is
reliant solely on the resources it raises through subscriptions.
This independence guarantees that the publication provides unbiased
information, with no agenda other than that of promoting social
dialogue and social innovation.
How do you participate in IR
Notes? When
you subscribe to IR Notes, you’re not simply purchasing a product.
Via IR Notes, we want to facilitate the exchange of ideas between
people who are interested in European social practices, over and
above any political, trade union or linguistic differences. Each
collective subscription includes all of the available languages.
When you subscribe to IR Notes, you’re helping to provide everyone
with a competitively-priced tool for monitoring social affairs, and
to take a step closer towards offering further languages. IR Notes
is a participatory tool, to which every reader can contribute by
sending information to the editor (frederic.t@irshare.eu) or by uploading documents (agreements,
etc.) to the IR Share website.
What development plans are there
for IR Notes? We’d really like to include the languages
spoken in the countries of Eastern Europe, but each language
represents an additional translation and thus a substantial extra
cost, given that we insist on work of impeccable quality. We would
also like to offer more interviews. In addition, we plan to present
other material, notably via video or creating a publication. We’re
interested to hear your opinion, and invite you to send us your
suggestions (frederic.t@irshare.eu).
How is IR Notes
sold? IR
Notes is sold exclusively by subscription, taken out either
individually on the IR
Share website, or as part of a
collective subscription taken out, for example, by a company’s
management or a European Works Council on behalf of its
members.
How
do you access the sources cited by IR
Notes? The hypertext links take you to
the source documents cited in the articles. These links take you
either to the source’s own website, or to the IR Share website to
whose database the document has been uploaded. Where possible, the
links take you to a document in the chosen language, and by default
to the English language version.
How do you open a document on the
IR Share website? To access documents on the IR
Share website, you have to
register on the site and create an account (there is no charge). You
can then download the documents you want, some of which are
restricted to IR Notes subscribers.
How can you help IR
Notes? Dear
reader, you’re our Marketing Department! If you like IR Notes,
please tell people about it on social media! We would be grateful if
you could suggest the names of people we could contact, who might be
interested in IR Notes and subscribing to it. We therefore rely on
you to guarantee our independence and our development. We need
you.
How
do we protect your personal data? Since
the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force,
you must have been inundated with messages concerning the protection
of your personal data! We’re taking advantage of this 100th edition
to tell you how IR Share gathers and processes your personal
data.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Please note!
Protecting your personal data
IR Share respects everyone’s right to
privacy and keeps your personal data confidential. All of the
personal data you pass on to us remains under the control of IR
Share. We do not share your data with any third parties other than
where we are required to comply with certain legal obligations.
Where subscriptions are taken out by a company’s management for a
European Works Council, we do not pass on any information regarding
your connections to IR Notes or any other use made of the IR Notes
newsletter or the IR Share website.
We gather personal data when you register
on the IR Share website or take out a subscription to IR Notes,
either directly, or indirectly via the management of your company,
your trade union or your European Works Council. The data we gather
and process enables us to send you the IR Notes newsletter as part
of a subscription or to grant you access to the database held on the
IR Share website. In all of these cases, we take the view that you
have agreed to give us this personal data and to become an IR Notes
subscriber. You can remove your name from the IR Notes distribution
list by clicking on the link provided for this purpose at the end of
the newsletter.
We take appropriate and necessary measures
to ensure that your data is retained for a reasonable period of time
and processed securely, in accordance with the General Data
Protection Regulation. If there are any changes to your personal
data or if you find that the data we hold on you is inaccurate, or
if you wish to access your personal data, you can contact us
via frederic.t@irshare.eu. The IR Share website uses cookies that store
and rapidly retrieve data held on your computer (or other device),
so that we can identify you and provide information that can be used
to enhance the quality of the service.
|
|
|
 |
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and
its network of experts, and is available in several European languages. It
offers Europe-wide monitoring of employment law, labour relations and
employment policy. It is available by subscription for 15 euros per month
(excluding tax), via the IR
Share website. IR Share is a privately-
owned, independent, apolitical company whose aim is to inform and assist all
players involved in social dialogue within and outside Europe. It has been
the correspondent organisation for France of the Dublin Foundation since
2009.
|
|
|
Lead
story
The OECD
sees collective bargaining as a powerful remedy for reducing inequalities and
adapting to change
In its Employment
Outlook 2018 report, the OECD notes significant improvements in the
situation in employment markets, whose performance is returning to levels comparable
to those that existed before the financial crisis. The OECD also emphasises the
virtues of collective bargaining (see press
release). Here are some the findings of this report, which is always
instructive: 1/ The OECD countries have overcome the economic and financial crisis.
For the first time there are more people with a job today than before the crisis,
and unemployment rates are below, or close to, pre-crisis levels in most countries.
2/ These good news stories are however accompanied by two worrying trends: firstly,
the picture continues to be mixed in terms of jobs quality and security (poverty has
grown among the working age population, reaching 10.6% in 2015 compared to 9.6% a
decade earlier). And secondly, nominal wage growth in the OECD area was only half of
what it was ten years earlier. “More worryingly”, the OECD adds, “wage stagnation
affects low-paid workers much more than those at the top”. 3/ The decentralisation
of collective bargaining, i.e. favouring collective bargaining at company level
rather than branch or national level, has not yet proved its worth. The OECD prefers
co-ordinated collective bargaining systems, which lead to higher levels of
employment and lower unemployment rates, including for young people, women and less
well qualified people. It also contributes to a better quality work environment and
“greater resilience of the labour market to shocks”. 4/ Collective bargaining could
be the answer to growing wage inequality, which is more pronounced in situations
where there is no collective bargaining or where companies themselves set
remuneration levels. 5/ If coordination of collective bargaining is to work
effectively, the social partners must be powerful and independent. They must have
the legitimacy they need to take sectoral initiatives in order to promote
adaptations in the employment market by facilitating workers’ transitions to new
jobs and by providing employees with the skills they need in order to cope with a
changing world of work. 6/ The OECD advocates extending social dialogue to SME and,
in terms of cover, to workers concerned by non-standard forms of employment. The
OECD recommends using an agreement extension procedure that will broaden the cover
provided by collective bargaining agreements to include start-up companies and
vulnerable workers.
|
1. European
Union
Legislation
|
Social
update
Sexual harassment: On 10 July,
the MEPs on the Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Committee adopted, by a very
large majority, a draft report proposing measures to combat mobbing and sexual
harassment in the EU (see press
release). This report, which is not yet available (see procedure
file), will be presented at a plenary session of Parliament in September.
The report emphasises that cases of sexual harassment “are significantly
under-reported”. The draft report underlines “the urgent need for Member States,
local and regional authorities, employers’ organisations and trade unions to
understand the barriers that women face in reporting cases of sexual harassment, and
gender-based discrimination and violence” and therefore to “help women and offer
them full support to report cases of sexual harassment, gender-based discrimination,
and harassment linked to pregnancy and maternity, without fear of possible
consequences”. MEPs once again invite the Commission to present “a proposal for a
directive against all forms of violence against women and girls and gender-based
violence, which includes joint definitions of the various types of violence against
women, including a revised and comprehensive definition of harassment and joint
legal standards covering criminalisation of this violence”.
- Reconciling employees’ careers and private
lives: On 12 July, the European Parliament’s Committee
on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the proposal
for a directive on work-life balance for parents and carers, presented
on 26 April by the European Commission. The text was adopted by 34 votes in
favour, 14 against and 4 abstentions. The tripartite negotiations with the
Commission and the Council, which has already finalised its position, are due to
begin in September (see press
release). The MEPs’ position is more generous than that of the Council
(see IR Notes 101, Lead story). They propose setting a remuneration or allowance
that is equivalent to at least 78% of the worker’s gross wage for parental and
carers’ leave, and 80% in the case of paternity leave.
|
Case law
Taking over employment contracts in the context
of a succession involving a contract to provide services:
the Court of Justice has issued a ruling on a case concerning the security guards
protecting the Museo de las Peregrinaciones, Santiago de Compostela, whose contract
of employment was transferred from their former employer to the undertaking that was
awarded the contract to provide the museum’s security service (CJEU,
11 July 2018, case C-60/17, Hermo). One of the employees concerned believed
that, in addition to taking over the contract of employment, the new employer should
also be liable to pay monies owed by the former employer. The new employer contended
that it was not liable for the monies in question, arguing that the contract of
employment was transferred merely via the application of a provision of the
collective agreement applicable, which obliges the undertaking holding the contract
“to take over the rights and obligations arising for the transferor undertaking from
the employment contracts”. It submits “that that subrogation obliges it to assume
only the obligations arising from the employment contracts from the date on which it
is awarded the contract and that it exempts it from liability for earlier
obligations”. To ensure the employee can recover the monies owed to them, the
guarantees granted by Directive 2001/23 should be applied. The latter provides for
all of the former employer’s rights and obligations to be transferred to the new
employer, and not just the contract of employment. The Court of Justice rules that
the directive should apply “to a situation in which a contracting entity has
terminated the contract for the provision of services relating to the security of
buildings concluded with one undertaking and has, for the purposes of the provision
of those services, concluded a new contract with another undertaking, which takes
on, pursuant to a collective agreement, the majority, in terms of their number and
skills, of the staff whom the first undertaking had assigned to the performance of
those services”. The domestic courts will now have to check whether “the operation
is accompanied by the transfer of an economic entity between the two undertakings
concerned”. This is not really in doubt, given that the Court indicates that “the
identity of an economic entity (…), which is essentially labour-intensive, can be
retained if the majority of its employees are taken on by the presumed transferee”.
|
2. Member
States
Germany
- Towards an increase in the minimum wage:
the commission responsible for setting the level of the
minimum wage has proposed a rise in the minimum wage over a two-year period.
When it was first introduced on 1 January 2017, the minimum wage was set at 8.84
euros per hour. This proposal would see it rise to 9.19 euros on 1 January 2019
and subsequently to 9.35 euros on 1 January 2020 (see press
release). The government will adopt an order passing these changes into
law.
|
Italy
- A decree-law to limit precarious
employment: On 2 July, the new government presented its
draft
“Dignity” decree-law, which is intended to curb precarious employment of
workers. Several parts of this piece of legislation are devoted to employment
law. In particular, the draft decree-law plans to reintroduce justification
grounds for the renewal of fixed-term contracts of employment and to limit their
maximum term to 24 months, including renewals. It also plans to increase the
amount of compensation payable in the event of unjustified dismissal and to
force companies that move away from the area to repay any public investment
funds that they may have received in the past. At the same time, the government
is preparing draft legislation that will confer the status of employees on
workers operating via digital platforms, which is something that case law
recently denied to workers delivering food on behalf of Foodora.
|
3.
Companies
European
Works Councils
Johnson & Johnson: On 13
June, the pharmaceuticals group accepted the offer made by the private equity
investment firm Platinum Equity, announced on 16 March, to purchase its LifeScan
business for 2.1 billion dollars. LifeScan is a player in the market for
self-monitoring of blood glucose (diabetes control). The operation should be
finalised by the end of 2018. On 20 May, the company’s European Works Council issued
a negative opinion regarding this operation. The opinion firstly reminds the group
of its “Credo”, issued in 1943 to express
its values. In particular, this states that employees ”must have a sense of security
in their jobs” and that the group “must be mindful of ways to help our employees
fulfill their family responsibilities”. Accordingly, the European Works Council
emphasises that management cannot merely rely on implementing the minimum provisions
laid down by law to manage the consequences of this operation. It also invites
Johnson & Johnson, as part of the deal, to include the initiation of a
negotiation process with Platinum Equity aimed at setting up a European Works
Council, given the size of its workforce in the Union (16,000 employees). While the
Council believes that this purchase represents a good opportunity for development,
it also highlights the uncertainties faced by the 1362 employees in the EU (total
workforce worldwide: 2,339), especially those working for bodies that do not
constitute a distinct legal entity, such as LifeScan. In its three-page opinion, the
committee concludes that it appears to be difficult to remove these employees from
their eco-system. “The deal is now concluded”, says Gijs Laureys, “but we still
haven’t had any response to our opinion. We don’t have much of an impact on the
decision-making process”.
|
Corporate
Social Responsibility
- EDF: At the meeting, on
26 June, of the EDF group’s committee responsible for monitoring its global
agreement on corporate social responsibility, management presented its initial
vigilance plan, which incorporates the requirements laid down by the French law
of 27 March 2017 relating to the duty of vigilance incumbent on parent companies
and work providers. Under this legislation, the vigilance plan should make it
possible to identify risks and prevent serious breaches of human rights and
fundamental freedoms, and health and safety issues relating to people and the
environment. The vigilance plan includes: 1° Risk-mapping (for individual
production sites and risks) ; 2° Evaluation procedures for subsidiaries,
subcontractors and suppliers with which an established business relationship is
maintained. 3° Appropriate actions to mitigate risks and prevent serious
breaches. 4° A mechanism for raising the alert and logging any issues reported.
5° Arrangements for monitoring the measures implemented and evaluating their
effectiveness.
|
Trade
unionism
- ArcelorMittal: At a
meeting held on 10 and 11 June this year in Luxembourg, which was attended by 70
trade union leaders from 18 different countries, a Global Union Network was
established under the auspices of the IndustriAll Global Union federation. The
network identified as a key aim, a written commitment from management to promote
a more formal, structured and regular global social dialogue. The network is
also calling on the group to support the creation of a global works council in
addition to the committee established within the framework of the global
agreement on health and safety in the workplace, signed by the group in 2007
(see
press release IndustriAll Global Union).
|
4. Studies
and reports
A social portrait of the EU in
2018: On 13 July the Commission published the 2018 edition
of its yearly
Employment and Social Developments in Europe (ESDE) review (see press
release). This document is vast in scope and it contains a huge quantity of
data broken down by country, as well as cross-disciplinary analyses of the options
and risks linked to technological innovation, to demographic changes and to
globalisation. A chapter on the initiatives taken by European social partners in
respect of issues associated with digitalisation is worthy of particular note.
- Study of European Works
Councils: following the delayed publication of its
evaluation report on Directive 2009/38 (see IR Notes
n° 98), the European Commission has also made public the Evaluation
study on the implementation of Directive 2009/38/EC on the establishment of
a European Works Council, produced by social policy consultants ICF,
involving 37 companies that have set up a European Works Council under the
auspices of the revised Directive 2009/38. On average, these councils have 16
members. 40% of European Works Councils meet between 2 and 4 times each year,
usually over a two-day period. 42% of companies have held at least one
extraordinary meeting over the past three years. Select committees meet three
times a year on average. 36% of councils have set up working parties. Where
restructuring proposals emerged, just 21% of the employee representatives
questioned believe that consulting the European Works Council resulted in a
change in management’s plans. 38% believe that this consultation had no effects
at all. Part of the study relates to the costs associated with European Works
Councils: it costs almost 120,000 euros to set one up (involving an average of
three negotiation meetings over a 14‑month period). The annual budget associated
with a European Works Council varies from 50,000 to 500,000 euros, depending on
the company in question. 75% of companies believe that this cost is below
100,000 euros per annum.
|
|
|