|
| |
IR Notes 129 — 6 November 2019
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
A question for…
Ralf Götz, manager of the team responsible for European Works Councils
and SE Works Councils
What
struck you most during the seminar organised by IG Metall
for European Works Councils (see 3.
Companies)? First of all I’m extremely
satisfied to see just how far the members of these bodies are
genuinely interested in discussing matters among themselves and in
learning best practice from one another, notably at the four
workshops that we organised. Also, I was amazed by some of the
results of the study performed by the European Trade Union Institute
on European Works Councils. It highlighted the fact that without
trade unions, these councils don’t work. This result represents high
praise for our work, and at the same time offers us encouragement.
One of the problems we face is that many trade unions in Europe view
European Works Councils with mistrust, believing that these bodies
are totally unrelated to trade unionism. Here too, we still have
work to do, to convince people that European Works Councils actually
have a great deal to do with trade unionism! We need to really get
involved in European Works Councils, support them and not simply
issue political recommendations regarding what they should do. We
have to be there at their meetings, in person, so that we can help
them. We coordinate the work of 130 European Works Councils and 23
SE Works Councils. Another thing to emerge from the seminar is that
European Works Councils can be a good springboard for other
policies. There’s no doubting the fact that their function involves
exchanging information and consultation with central management.
However, one of the key points is that the European Works Council is
a forum where people come together, face to face. It is vital for
European Works Councils members to have some time to themselves, to
establish an identity that is independent of the company’s
activities in various countries and to agree jointly on what actions
need to be taken. This is the goal that we as trade unionists are
seeking to achieve. It’s the very essence of what the work of
European Works Councils should be about.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Diary
12 November Noisy-Le-Grand
IRES
international seminar to discuss the book A la recherche de
l’Europe sociale [‘In search of a social Europe’] by Philippe
Pochet (European Trade Union Institute – ETUI) with Jean-Claude Barbier.
12 and 13
November Bilbao Healthy
workplaces summit 2019
14 and 15
November Brussels Final
conference of “European
Metal Workers’ Participation: state of play and best practices on
the edge”, the European project organised by the French
trade-union federation FGMM-CFDT, with the support of 12 associated
trade unions in Europe and the consultancy firm Syndex, which is
contributing its expertise. Simultaneous interpreting provided in
English, Spanish, French, Polish, Romanian and Czech. The conference is
open to European Works Council members, who must register via their
trade union. Contact: Caroline Blot – caroline.blot@fgmm.cfdt.fr
15
November Utrecht EOR
Platform, a forum for European Works Council members, organised
by SBI Formaat, with a presentation of the European Works Councils study
performed by the European Trade Union Institute (discussions in Dutch
only).
26 November
Helsinki
Eurofound, in cooperation with the Finnish Ministries of Economic
Affairs, Employment, Social Affairs and Health, as well as the Finnish
social partners, is organising a seminar
on the effects of digitalisation on the quality of working life.
27 November
Helsinki
Conference organised by the Finnish presidency of the Council of the
European Union on eliminating
occupational cancer.
3 and 4
December Brussels Conference
organised by the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) on “The
future of health and safety in Europe”, thirty years after the
adoption of the 1989 EU Framework Directive.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Who we are?
IR Notes
is a fortnightly newsletter produced
by IR Share and
its network of experts, and is available in several European languages
(English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). It offers Europe-wide
monitoring of employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It
is available by subscription for 18 euros per month.
>>> News:
The IR Notes newsletter has been recognised as an “on-line press
service” under Article 1 of Law no. 86-897 of 1 August 1986 reforming
press legislation. In addition to constituting recognition of the
quality of IR Notes, the benefit of having “on-line press service”
status is that we can now invoice IR Notes subscriptions at a reduced
VAT rate of 2.1%.
The team This issue
was produced by
Predrag
Bejakovic, Catarina Carvalho
and Frédéric
Turlan. Find
out more about the IR Share
team on our website
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95
or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
Legal notice.
Publisher: IR Share SARL – 5, Les Compères – 89520 Fontenoy,
France – Tel.: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 – share capital 1,500 euros –
commercial register (RCS Auxerre): 512 567 959. Managing editor:
Frédéric Turlan. Hosting: Ideal prod – 14 rue Auguste Morel – 89100
Sens – France – Tel.: + 33 (0)3 86 83 21 21. CPPAP no.: 0621 Z 93933.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Lead
story
EU General
Court ruling will hamper the progress of European social dialogue
The General Court of the European Union has delivered a ruling (TEU,
24 October 2019, Judgment T-310/18, EPSU and Jan Goudriaan v. European
Commission), which calls into question a practice provided for since 1991 by
the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The treaty enables the
social partners to sign European agreements, either at their own initiative or in
response to a consultation by the European Commission, where the Commission deems it
useful to have a European initiative in an area that comes under the heading of
social affairs and is therefore within the competence of the European social
partners (TFEU, Articles 154 and 155). This applies both to cross-industry
agreements and to those signed at sectoral level. So that the provisions of these
agreements can apply to all EU employers and employees, the signatories are entitled
to ask the Commission to submit their agreement to the Council (which represents the
Member States). The Council can then adopt a decision that seeks to extend the
provisions of the agreement by means of a directive, so that they will apply
throughout the European Union. The unique feature of this procedure is that it
enables the European social partners to set social standards in areas such as
fixed-term contracts, part-time working, working hours, health and safety in the
workplace, etc. via collective agreements. The other distinctive feature is that on
the basis of a Council decision, these agreements can therefore be extended within
the EU, without either the Commission or the Council being able to change the text,
while the European Parliament is merely notified of the steps taken. Until 2012, the
Commission systematically passed on to the Council any agreements signed, for the
purpose of adopting a decision, while performing a check based on three criteria,
namely: that the signatories were duly representative; that the content complied
with EU law; and that the content did not constitute an excessive burden for SME.
However, from 2012 onwards, sectoral social dialogue became an annoying anomaly,
during a period when the Commission froze all initiatives in the area of social
legislation. As it was continuing to receive requests from social partners to extend
their agreements, and thus to create harmonised standards at EU level, the
Commission decided to challenge the quasi-automatic way in which agreements are
submitted to the Council, taking the view that it is vested with powers to judge
whether or not it is appropriate for the agreement to be referred to the Council. A
series of restrictions on the social partners’ autonomy have since followed,
accompanied by a number of vexatious interventions, the effect of which has been to
block this original source of new social standards. The Tribunal’s ruling brings
this original model to an end, thereby confirming the Commission’s right not to
implement the outcome of European social dialogue. > Find out more: the highly
instructive working paper published by the European Trade Union Institute, “Legislative
implementation of European social partner agreements: challenges and
debates“, by Jean-Paul Tricart. > See also: reactions of the
social partners: EPSU,
ETUC
|
1. European
Union
Social
update
Moves towards a directive on management of
restructuring : When a resolution was passed on 24 October,
noting the “negative
impact of the bankruptcy of Thomas Cook on EU tourism” (see press
release), MEPs took the opportunity to remind the European Commission that
they had passed a resolution
in January 2013, calling on it to submit a proposal for a legal act on information
and consultation of workers, anticipation and management of
restructuring.
|
Case law
Justification of secret surveillance :
in a Spanish case concerning a supermarket
manager who dismissed a number of employees for their involvement in thefts as
demonstrated by secret surveillance, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
accepts that this type of mechanism can be used without giving prior notification to
employees. Admittedly, it accepts that both Spanish law and “the relevant
international and European standards … establish that it is, in principle,
necessary to inform” employees “clearly and prior to implementation, of the
existence and conditions of such data collection, even if only in a general manner”.
However it rules that the “detailed balancing exercise”, carried out by the Spanish
courts, between the employees’ right to respect for their private life, and on the
other the employer’s interest in ensuring the protection of its property and the
smooth running of the company, is legitimate. The existence of reasonable suspicion
that serious misconduct has been committed and the extent of the losses identified
in the present case may appear to constitute weighty justification of the absence of
any prior notification. Three judges published a dissenting opinion in which they
argue that “by not condemning such behaviour committed by private parties, the Court
is encouraging individuals to take legal matters into their own hands”. The European
Trade Union Confederation had intervened in the case to defend the principle of
prior notification (ECtHR, 17
October 2019, no. 1874/13 and 8567/13, Lopez Ribalda and others v. Spain).
|
Sectoral
social dialogue
- Gas : the European
trade-union federations IndustriAll Europe and EPSU, and the employers’
organisation Eurogas, have relaunched their European social dialogue in the gas
sector in a context of a “decarbonised” economy, with the support of the
European Commission (see joint
press release issued by EPSU and Eurogas, EPSU
press release and speech
by the Eurogas General Secretary).
|
Trade
unionism
Equal pay : the
European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) will be submitting its proposals to the
European Commission for strengthening legislation relative to pay transparency, with
a view to “compulsory gender pay reporting, backed up by fines for companies who
fail to make the necessary declarations, becoming some of the “binding pay
transparency measures” promised by the new European Commission President, Ursula von
der Leyen (see press
release).
- New rights to leave: the
European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) has launched a campaign to encourage
Member States to pass into their domestic law, as soon as possible, the EU
directive on work-life balance, which grants parents in several countries rights
to new types of leave (see press
release)
- The right to switch off from
work: the Uni Global Union federation has launched a
campaign to promote the right to disconnect from work, with the support of a handbook
drawn up to help affiliated trade unions to negotiate this right (see press
release).
|
2. Member
States
Belgium
- Bicycle allowance to be provided across the
board : According to the main Belgian
trade union confederation (CSC), approximately 793,000 employees will soon be
entitled to a bicycle allowance for the first time, under 12 sector-wide
agreements signed within the framework of the 2019-2020 draft cross-industry
agreement (AIP), drawn up in the spring of this year. Workers receiving either a
new or an increased allowance will soon benefit on average from the sum of 17
centimes per kilometre (see press
release).
|
Croatia
Minimum wage : A new
minimum wage law came into force on 1 January 2019. The aim is to make the
minimum wage policy more predictable and more transparent. The government will
continue to fix the minimum wage level once a year for the next calendar year, based
on a recommendation made by the Minister of Employment, following consultation with
the social partners. However, to strengthen this consultation mechanism, the law now
specifies that the minimum wage level should be determined by 31 October each year,
while consultations with the social partners must be held from September onwards.
The law also establishes a committee to monitor and analyse the minimum wage. This
committee is an advisory body assisting the minister, who proposes the minimum wage
level for the following year. Accordingly, on 31 October, the government proposed
raising the minimum wage to 4,062.51 HRK (544.60 euros) for next year, i.e. a rise
of 8.33% (41.90 euros), representing 46.49% of the average wage of Croatian
workers. > Find out more: government press
release (in Croatian)
|
Portugal
Reform of the employment market :
Law no. 93/2009 of
4 September 2019 has introduced major changes to social legislation. These
changes concern trial periods for jobs, vocational training, fixed-term contracts,
temporary and intermittent work (including on-call work), organisation of working
hours and collective bargaining. The main aim is to promote stability of employment
and to tackle the high level of segmentation of the employment market, by limiting
the use of fixed-term contracts and offering temporary workers greater protection.
Nevertheless, some of the measures adopted have been highly controversial, which has
led the left-wing parties supporting the government to formulate a request calling
for an evaluation of the law’s constitutionality (still in progress). The more
controversial questions concern: the new six-month trial period for employees
looking for their first job or in a situation of long-term unemployment; an
extension of the periods authorised for very short-term contracts (casual work); and
the new arrangements governing the expiry of collective agreements. The new law,
with a few exclusions, came into force on 1 October 2019.
|
3.
Companies
European
Works Council
IG Metall forum for European Works Council
members : On 24 and 25 October, the German trade union IG Metall organised its
“ERB/SE-BR forum” in Frankfurt. This takes place once a year and, explains Ralf
Götz, the manager of the union’s team responsible for European Works Councils and SE
Works Councils, “it’s the only place where European Works Council members and SE
Works Council members, experts and our team can come together to discuss specific
issues encountered by these transnational employee representation bodies.” More than
35 European Works Council members and SE Works Council members took part in
workshops. While those dealing with restructurings and with information and
consultation procedures were full to capacity, two others also aroused a great deal
of interest: one on how dialogue between management and the European Works Council
can create added value, both for companies and their employees, highlighting the
practices employed by the European Works Council of the Swedish group Sandvik. The
other workshop focused on how European Works Councils should approach the
implementation of IT systems for production management and planning.
|
- New European Works Council created :
On 29 October, following three years of
negotiations, the US-based group XPO
Logistics Europe signed an agreement establishing a
European Works Council, with a special negotiation group supported by the
European trade-union federation ETF (see ETF press
release).
|
Trade
unionism
- Trade union network : The
first global union network meeting of the German pencil and crayon manufacturer
Faber-Castell was held
from 30 September to 2 October, in Germany. Participants from seven countries
and eight production plants were present at this meeting, which was coordinated
by the global union federation BWI and the German trade union IG Metall, with
the support of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation (FES). They issued a Declaration
of Solidarity with workers at the Goa site (India) (EN DE) (see press
release). Also, on 16 October, 15 trade union representatives from
Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Germany and Hungary met in Slovakia to discuss and
share their experience with the Austrian construction company Strabag (75,000 employees),
with the support of the trade-union federations BWI, EFBWW and FES (see press
release). The union network of the Saint-Gobain group (549,000
employees) met at the beginning of November in Paris, and discussed the group’s
new strategy, as well as the application of digitalisation and its impact on
company workers. They decided to pursue their work on this subject and to gather
information via an online questionnaire (see press
release).
|
|
|