 |
| |
IR Notes 13 – 2 July 2014
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
Who we are?
IR Share is a provider that
shares information, documentation and expertise for HR managers and
employee representatives. The IR Share agency operates by way of online
publications, working groups, training devoted to relevant topics and a
network of experts.
The team
This issue was produced by Luisa Andias
Gonçalves, Catarina de Oliveira Carvalho,
Francisco Gomez Abelleira, Sofia Lampousaki, Ekaterina Markova and
Frédéric Turlan. Find out more about
the IR Share
team on our website.
Subscribe to IR
Notes Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on:
+33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 or
E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
Special offer: TEST
package for one month (5 euros plus tax) or two months (30 euros
plus tax).
|
|
|
|
| |
Interview
Armindo Silva, Director for Employment and Social Legislation, Social
Dialogue in the Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and
Inclusion of the European Commission.
The European Union is perceived by
the trade union world, but also by some of its citizens, as no
longer protecting employees enough and as being the instigator
of reforms aimed at reducing workers’ rights.
Is this the case? The European Union has a social legislation
system that protects employees with the goal of improving their
working and living conditions which is one of the most advanced in
the world. However, it does not cover all employees’ rights, and a
significant part of these rights remains within the jurisdiction of
national authorities. Every day, the Commission works to ensure that
the rights established by more than 50 directives, the Lisbon Treaty
and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union are
respected. The European Commission does not have a hidden agenda
intended to detract from current labour law. We are working to
ensure this legislation is implemented and to adapt it when the need
arises, in order to make it clearer and more effective. In the
framework of the REFIT programme, we are actually undertaking an
exercise to screen the entire stock of EU legislation, with an
emphasis on first evaluating, before making proposals. This applies
to all community legislation and not only social laws. So far, more
than 90 % of social legislation has been, or is in the process of
being, assessed.
What is the concrete purpose of
this evaluation exercise? It will allow us to put forward smarter and
more robust proposals, as we achieved with the new directive on
risks from exposure to electromagnetic fields or the recent posted
workers’ enforcement directive. We have arrived at a compromise with
the European Parliament and the Council which ensures effective
protection of posted workers and greater transparency, and guards
more strongly against abuses.
But hasn’t the Troika suggested
reforms aimed at making the employment market more flexible and
going back on the social acquis? The Commission services are carefully
examining the Troika’s recommendations, and we are verifying their
compliance with European Union legislation. That is the Commission’s
role. But some of the proposals put forward by the Troika concern
matters which are not explicitly covered by European legislation.
Such recommendations must in any case always be discussed in
consultations with the national social partners.
Another source of concern is the
apparent desire to reduce the obligations on employers in small
companies We
are mindful of the European Council’s recommendations aimed at
reviewing the obligations arising from EU legislation which impose
an administrative burden on small and medium-size enterprises. The
REFIT programme is partly a response to this Council demand to pay
particular attention to the burdens affecting SMEs when we evaluate
the legislation. However, this does not mean that our task is to
remove them without considering the impact of these regulations on
the environment or on health!
Yet the new strategy on health and
safety at work suggests that the obligations on SMEs may be
reduced Reducing
obligations which are found to be
excessive or obsolete is acceptable, but without lessening the level
of worker protection in terms of health and safety. For example, the
group of high-level experts working on administrative burdens had
suggested that micro-enterprises in sectors with low health and
safety risks could be exempted from the obligation to keep risk
assessment documents. Then the consultative committee on health and
safety at work was asked for its opinion and ruled this idea out. In
the end, the Commission decided to examine in depth the manner in
which this stipulation is implemented by the different Member
States, and it will publish its conclusions in the near future. But
the Commission has not produced any simplification measures in order
to exempt enterprises from certain obligations because we consider
that all workers require protection, whatever the size of the
company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and
its network of experts, and is available in several European languages. It
offers Europe-wide monitoring of employment law, labour relations and
employment policy. It is available by subscription for 15 euros per month ;
150 euros per year (excluding tax), via the IR Share
website. IR Share is a privately- owned,
independent, apolitical company whose aim is to inform and assist all
players involved in social dialogue within and outside Europe. It has been
the correspondent organisation for France and Luxembourg of the Dublin
Foundation since 2009 and for Bulgaria since 2014.
|
|
|
Lead
story
The recent
initiatives taken by the European Commission have drawn very mixed reactions
Having presented its new European strategy on health and safety at work (see IR
Notes 12), the Commission on 18 June adopted a communication on the “Regulatory
Fitness and Performance Programme: state of play and outlook“
(REFIT). While the first document did not announce any prescriptive proposals in the
short term, preferring to focus on evaluating the relevant legislation (see
interview alongside), the second provides for the proposal to amend directive 92/85,
on the protection of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or
are breastfeeding, to be withdrawn. This text had caused a rift between the Council
and European Parliament, with no hope of a compromise being reached. In a working
document which accompanies the communication, the Commission further announces: 1/
Confirmation that the first stage consultation of the European social partners is to
begin on consolidating and recasting the three directives granting workers a right
to information and consultation: directives 2002/14 (general framework for informing
and consulting employees), 98/59 (collective redundancies) and 2001/23 (business
transfers). 2/ A new proposal to amend directive 2003/88 on working time (scheduled
for 2015). 3/ Evaluation, in 2014, of directives 99/70 and 97/81 on fixed-term and
part-time work respectively, followed in the second quarter of 2015 by directive
91/533 (information for employees about their employment contract). Globally these
initiatives have been criticised by the trade union world, which sees in them a
desire to undermine labour law. The European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), which
found that the health and safety strategy was “too late and too weak” (press
release), also censured the REFIT communication. “The Commission is
boasting that they are making EU law lighter, simpler and less costly. But for
whom?” asked Veronica Nilsson, ETUC confederal secretary, who denounced the
withdrawal of the proposal for a maternity protection directive (see ETUC press
release). The UNI Europa trade union federation takes issue with
the draft Council conclusions which praise the progress made by the REFIT programme
on the removal of regulations which are not fit for purpose, and denounces the REFIT
communication (see press
release), while the stance
adopted by European Federation of Building and Woodworkers (EFBWW) is that REFIT
“poses a threat to health and safety at work and working conditions”. The tone on
the employers’ side is equally forthright. CEEMET, the European employers’
organisation representing the interests of the metal, engineering and
technology-based industries, has sharply criticised the health and safety at work
strategy, finding it senseless to adopt such a document before the process to
evaluate the relevant legislation has been completed; it also believes that existing
legislation must be implemented consistently and effectively across all 28 Member
States before taking new initiatives (see press
release, in English). These positions appear to be an attempt by each party
to influence future European social policy, which the next European Commissioner for
Employment and Social Affairs will be tasked with implementing.
|
1. European
Union
Legislative
proposal
|
Social
update
- Little progress at the Council meeting for
employment and social affairs: At their
meeting on 19 and 20 June, the European ministers in charge of employment and
social affairs failed to reach agreement on the three main dossiers on the
agenda (see press
release, in English) : 1. While all the States are in agreement with the
aim of strengthening the presence of women on company boards, as put forward by
the European Commission in a proposal for a directive aimed at establishing a
40 % quota for the sex under-represented on such bodies, “opinions continue to
differ sharply regarding the best way of achieving it”. Several countries
rejected intervention at European level in this connection as well as any
binding measures. 2. Another blocking minority prevented a general approach from
being agreed on the proposal to establish a European platform for improving
cooperation in order to combat non-declared work. Several countries rejected the
idea of being obliged to participate in this platform, while others objected to
some of its missions. 3. The proposal for a directive on implementing the
principle of equal treatment of individuals irrespective of religion, belief,
disability, age or sexual orientation was again the subject of a progress
report. A large number of outstanding issues remain, making it impossible to
forecast when this proposal might eventually be adopted.
- European hospitality and tourism skills
passport: On 17 June the European
Commission presented the European hospitality and tourism skills passport, which
aims to facilitate contact between job seekers and employers in the catering and
tourist industries in Europe. The passport will enable employers and employees
to overcome linguistic barriers and will allow the former to compare the skills
of the latter. The document is provided on the EURES
portal and is available in all the Union’s official languages. The
Commission added that its sphere of application will be extended to other
sectors in due course. The skills passport is an initiative conducted jointly by
the Commission and the social partners in the hospitality sector (see press
release of the European Federation of Trade Unions in the Food,
Agriculture and Tourism sectors (EFFAT) and the press
release of HOTREC, the umbrella association representing hotels,
restaurants, cafés and similar establishments in Europe).
- Aid from the European Globalisation
Adjustment Fund for Greece: On 25 June, the European
Commission proposed to provide Greece with 6 million euros from the European
Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to help 484 employees of
the Nutriart industrial bakery and its suppliers and downstream producers, as
well as 24 self-employed persons whose activity was directly linked to Nutriart,
to return to work. In addition, 505 young people not in employment, education or
training (NEETs) are to receive assistance under the new EGF Regulation, which
allows EGF support to be offered to the same number of NEETs as of redundant
workers aided by the Fund (see Commission press
release).
|
Case law
- A woman who gives up work because of
pregnancy is still considered a worker: The European
Court of Justice has ruled that the fact that the physical constraints of
pregnancy “require a woman to give up work during the period needed for
recovery”, following her pregnancy and childbirth, “does not, in principle,
deprive her of the status of worker” (CJEU,
19 June 2014, case C-507/12, Saint Prix). The fact that, for these
reasons, she is not actually available “on the employment market of the host
Member State for a few months does not mean that she has ceased to belong to
that market during that period, provided she returns to work or finds another
job within a reasonable period after confinement”. Consequently, the Court
reasoned that a woman who has been forced to stop work because of pregnancy can
legitimately claim the benefit of income support reserved for “workers” within
the meaning of Article 45 of the TFEU.
|
2. Member
States
Bulgaria
- Support for jobs: In
keeping with the legislation on promoting investment, the State has decided to
take over the social security contributions of 3,400 people who are to be
recruited by 13 major high-tech industrial and service enterprises in
municipalities experiencing a high unemployment rate. The Council of Ministers
has decided to allocate 10.5 million lev (5.3 million euros) to this programme
and, in return, the industrialists have undertaken to invest more than 66
million lev (33 million euros) in increasing their production. The supported
investors must maintain the jobs in these projects for at least five years.
|
France
- Law on improving the status of
trainees: On 26 June the French parliament definitively
adopted the law on
the organisation of traineeships and improving the status of trainees.
From September 2015, the monthly remuneration paid to trainees remaining in a
company for more than two months will go up from 436.05 to 523.26 euros for
151.37 hours of work. The wording makes clear that a traineeship agreement must
not be signed for the execution of regular work corresponding to a permanent
post, or to cover a temporary increase in activity or a seasonal job, or to
replace an employee or official who is absent or has been suspended from his
employment contract. Furthermore, the number of trainees permitted by the same
employer is limited (the limit will be determined subsequently by decree).
- Law concerning posted
workers: On 26 June, the French
parliament definitively adopted a bill aimed at
combating unfair social competition, which amends the legislation on
posted workers and the fight against illegal employment. The wording reinforces
the responsibility of contractors for their subcontractors. Contractors must
ensure that their subcontractors apply social legislation correctly, and the law
establishes a mechanism for joint and several liability in relation to wage
payments. The text also lays down the conditions for rest breaks by professional
drivers. The law provides for the names of companies found guilty of illegal
work to be published on the internet. Trade union organisations will have more
scope for protecting the interests of posted employees.
|
Greece
- IMF calls for industrial relations
reforms: In its 5th
review of the intervention programme in Greece (in English), the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) has recommended new reforms, including
reviewing the supplementary component of the minimum wage based on seniority in
the labour market (up to 30% more for 9 or more years’ experience); this brings
the minimum wage to an unacceptably high level for the less-educated and
long-term unemployed. In the view of the IMF, wage rises should be linked
exclusively to increased productivity rather than to seniority. The review
regrets that Greece has not amended its legislation on the right to strike and
continues to prohibit lockouts as a defensive tool for employers during
collective negotiations. The government is requested, by October 2014, to reform
the law on collective dismissals (because of their excessive cost) and
industrial relations and bring them in line with international best practice.
Between now and December 2014, it must adopt a unified Labour Code encompassing
all existing legislation relevant for labour and industrial relations.
|
Portugal
- Reform of collective bargaining:
The government has put forward fresh proposals to amend the collective
bargaining system aimed at reducing the survival period of collective agreements
(bill
230/XII of 5 June 2014, in Portuguese). In particular, the text limits
the survival clauses of collective agreements to three years (instead of five)
and reduces from 18 to 12 months the period for renegotiating a collective
agreement. At the end of this period, in the absence of a new deal, the
collective agreement will become invalid (see IR Share analysis, in English). In
other respects, the bill will enable a collective employment agreement to be
temporarily suspended by companies in a period of crisis for structural or
technological reasons, or because of a disaster or other events seriously
impairing the company’s normal operation, for as long as this step is necessary
to ensure the company’s viability and to safeguard jobs. Exemption from
collective agreements is subject to a written agreement between the employer and
the signatory trade unions.
|
Spain
- Taxation of redundancy
payments: On 20 June the Spanish
Council of Ministers adopted an income tax reform bill which provides in
particular for redundancy payments exceeding 2,000 euros per year of service to
be taxed. Above this amount, they would be subject to taxation, whereas legal
severance pay is currently exempt. Discussions are to be held with the trade
unions, which are opposed to this measure, regarding it as a double hardship.
- Exemption from social contributions for
research and development: A new
regulation that enters force from September 2014 will allow companies to reduce
their social security contributions by 40% for employees engaged full time in
R&D activities (Real Decreto
475/2014, de 13 de junio, sobre bonificaciones en la cotización a la
Seguridad Social del personal investigador, in Spanish). A transitional
arrangement will allow businesses which already employ staff dedicated to
research and development to backdate this decrease to 1 January 2013.
|
3.
Companies
European
works councils
- Axa: At the plenary
session of the Axa Group European works council (CEG) on 11 June in Madrid, the
management presented a plan for the group’s digital transformation which will
have repercussions for both jobs and skills. “This will be an opportunity for
the European works council to implement the European Agreement on the
Anticipation of Change which we signed at the end of 2011,” said Olivier Pelras
(CFDT), secretary of the Axa Group European works council. As a transnational
project, the European works council “will be at the heart of the social dialogue
process,” commented the EWC. The CEG secretariat, which met on 24 June, has
begun “developing a working method which will be presented at the next plenary
meeting in November”. “A key point for the success of our role for the benefit
of employees is the best articulation as possible between CEG and staff
representative bodies of each entity” (see press
release). In other respects, the CEG has welcomed the Axa Group’s
participation in the launch of the “Alliance for Youth” initiated by the Nestlé
group, which has seen Axa commit to employing 20,000 young people between now
and 2018 (including 9,000 in France). Half of these will be employed under
fixed-term contracts, while the other half will be engaged on short-term or
work-linked training contracts.
- Opel/Vauxhall: In
partnership with the British, Austrian and Spanish trade unions and the European
works council, the German trade union IG Metall based at the Opel/Vauxhall
car-making plant organised a week for young workers employed by the group at
Rüsselsheim, the main production site. They met with management and Wolfgang
Schäfer-Klug (IG Metall), president of the European works council, and called
for an exchange programme between the young workers at the various locations in
Europe and a seat for a member to represent their generation on the EWC. In
addition, according to IG Metall, they decided to form a new network of young
Europeans within the group which will meet at least once a year.
|
Restructuring
- Danone: The trade unions
affiliated with the IUF in Europe representing the employees of the Danone food
group on 11 June “told the company in clear terms that they unanimously oppose
the closure” of three European factories producing dairy products – in Italy,
Germany and Hungary – which will result in the loss of 325 jobs (see IUF press release). In a press
release the management stated that, working closely with the social
partners, it “intends to take social measures identifying job solutions for each
of the employees who might be concerned”. The IUF and the European works council
(CIC) have called upon Danone’s management to respect the joint
understanding signed in 1997 with the IUF, which provides for a
three-month period to allow “trade unions to submit proposals as alternatives to
plans by management” when the latter has envisaged changes in business
activities affecting employment or working conditions. Otherwise, the European
works council has adopted a declaration
of solidarity and has decided to commission two expert reports, one on
the economic reasons leading Danone to close these three sites and the other on
the future of these sites and their employees.
|
4. Studies
and reports
Working time in Europe :
Eurofound has published its annual survey on working hours in Europe (Developments
in collectively agreed working time 2013, in English). The average
collectively agreed working week remained unchanged in 2013 at 38.1 hours, as in
2012. Significant differences persist between the pre-2004 Member States (30 minutes
less than the EU average) and those which have joined more recently (90 minutes more
than the EU average). France is the country where the working week is shortest (35.6
hours), followed by Denmark (37) and Sweden (37.1). The survey also looked at paid
leave and public holidays: together, these total 40 days in Germany and France,
compared to 29 in Belgium.
- Actual average hours worked per year in
Europe: The French economic institute Coe-Rexecode,
which is close to employers, has for its part published a study
of actual hours worked in Europe (in French), based on the data
contained in the EU
Labour Force Survey. Finland emerges as the country where the actual
average hours worked by full-time employees are the lowest (1,648 hours), just
ahead of France (1,661) and Sweden (1,685). The highest totals were recorded in
Romania (2,099), Greece (2,010) and Hungary (1969). Germany’s hours were 1,847,
with the United Kingdom on 1,900.
- Job vacancy rate in the EU:
On 17 June, Eurostat published quarterly data on the job vacancy rate for
the first time (see press
release). This new indicator provides demand-side data on the employment
market. According to the figures published by Eurostat, the job vacancy rate in
the euro area was 1.7 % in the first quarter of 2014, an increase over the 1.6 %
recorded in both the preceding quarter and the first quarter of 2013. The job
vacancy rate in the EU as a whole was 1.6 % in the first quarter of 2014, up
slightly compared to the rate of 1.5 % recorded in the preceding quarter and the
first quarter of 2013.
- Working conditions in
hairdressing: Eurofound has published a report by the
Institute of Employment Studies commissioned by the European social partners on
different scenarios aimed at evaluating likely working conditions in the sector
in ten years’ time and the strategies which might be implemented by the social
partners (“Improving
quality of work and employment in the hairdressing sector: Scenarios for
social partner cooperation“, in English).
|
Phrase of
the fortnight
President of
the European Commission
The 28 Member States have thus appointed the former Prime Minister of Luxembourg,
Jean-Claude Juncker, as the head of the European Commission for a period of five
years. A Christian Democrat politician of considerable experience who speaks several
languages, he will have the job of leading this institution which 1/ represents and
defends the interests of the EU as a whole; 2/ presents legislative proposals; 3/
oversees the proper application of policies; 4/ implements the EU budget and 5/
monitors compliance with European treaties and laws. Far from being a figurehead,
the president defines the Commission’s political direction and appoints the
commissioners in liaison with the Member States. The appointment of the latter, as
well as of the president, must be endorsed by the European Parliament. Find out more
on Europa
and in Eurofound’s Industrial
relations dictionary (in English).
|
|
|