|
| |
IR Notes 134 – 29 January 2020
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
A question for…
Heinz-Georg Webers, secretary of the Bayer European Works Council (Bayer
European Forum)
On 28 November 2019, your European
Works Council signed a joint
declaration with the Bayer group’s board to accompany a reorganisation. What is
the purpose of this declaration? In November 2018, the management presented a
reorganisation project designed to cut costs by 1.4 billion euros a
year from 2022. This primarily affects the support and corporate
functions at head office in Germany, and in many countries around
the world — 7,000 jobs are affected – and particularly in the EU (v.
IR
Notes no. 133). We have been
holding discussions with the management for a year, both in board
meetings where employees are represented, and in works councils. We
have negotiated measures which apply to employees affected by the
changes. In the Bayer European Forum, we have decided to force the
management to make commitments to take action in all the countries
affected in accordance with the “Terms of Fair Treatment” and to
ensure that local reorganisations are handled in the spirit of the
“Bayer social way” which we have developed in Germany. We take the
view that the role of the European Works Council is to ensure that
basic standards are met in all countries, and that it is then left
to local social partners to implement them, adapt them to local
circumstances, particularly the labour market, and even improve
them, of course. The joint declaration covers, for example, “fair
treatment of the employees affected”, as well as the need to improve
“the employability of all members of the workforce”. Compliance with
these principles will be monitored every three months in the Joint
Committee which, along with the employer, is made up of members of
the European Works Council representing the main countries in terms
of size of workforce, and members representing clusters of small
countries. Our aim is to support workforce representatives at local
level and act as an intermediary with the management if problems are
identified.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| |
Who we are?
IR Notes
is a fortnightly newsletter produced
by IR Share and
its network of experts, and is available in several European languages
(English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). It offers Europe-wide
monitoring of employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It
is available by subscription for 18 euros per month.
>>> News:
The IR Notes newsletter has been recognised as an “on-line press
service” under Article 1 of Law no. 86-897 of 1 August 1986 reforming
press legislation. In addition to constituting recognition of the
quality of IR Notes, the benefit of having “on-line press service”
status is that we can now invoice IR Notes subscriptions at a reduced
VAT rate of 2.1%.
The team This issue
was produced by Francisco
Gomez Abelleira, Tamas
Gyulavari and
Frédéric
Turlan. Find
out more about the IR Share
team on our website
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95
or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
Legal notice.
Publisher: IR Share SARL – 5, Les Compères – 89520 Fontenoy,
France – Tel.: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 – share capital 1,500 euros –
commercial register (RCS Auxerre): 512 567 959. Managing editor:
Frédéric Turlan. Hosting: Ideal prod – 14 rue Auguste Morel – 89100
Sens – France – Tel.: + 33 (0)3 86 83 21 21. CPPAP no.: 0621 Z 93933.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Lead
story
The
impossibility of comparing exposure to accidents at work
On 24 January, the European Statistical Office (Eurostat) updated its data
on accidents at work in 2017. The good news is that the number of
fatal accidents at work dropped slightly: there were 3,552 deaths
in 2017, 36 fewer than in 2016. However, almost ten European workers die every day
at work (table
1 in the report). This is about the only reliable statistic from all the
data which Eurostat collected. The reason for this is that although fatal accidents
are properly documented in all Member States, they are not documented in the same
way in all of them. Finland, for example, does not count deaths due to a voluntary
act on the part of the employee, such as suicide, whereas in France, acts of this
nature may be regarded as accidents at work. As a further example, an employee who
dies from a heart attack in their place of work in France will be deemed to be the
victim of a work-related accident, and it is up to the employer to prove otherwise.
In contrast, it will not be recorded as a work-related accident in Germany, unless
it can be shown that the heart attack was directly linked to the work being
performed. “It is very difficult to make comparisons because national systems for
recognising work-related accidents and legal rules are so different”, stresses
Raphaël Haeflinger, Director of Eurogip, a
French organisation which specialises in issues relating to insurance and the
prevention of work-related accidents and occupational illnesses at both European and
international level. In 2016, Eurogip and its German counterpart DGUV analysed their
statistics together and reached the conclusion that the accident rate was very
similar, despite the discrepancy in the data sent to Eurostat (see report,
in French). Statistics on non-fatal accidents at work are even more unreliable: for
example, Bulgaria and Romania seem to be the countries with the fewest work-related
accidents, way ahead of the Nordic countries which are known for their culture of
prevention. The worst offenders, with a high incidence of recorded accidents above
2,500 per 100,000 workers (see graph
2 in the report) are France (almost 3,500), followed by Portugal and Spain,
as opposed to barely a hundred in Bulgaria and Romania (although it is these latter
two countries which declare the most fatal accidents). These figures highlight the
tremendous diversity which exists among systems for recognising work-related
accidents coupled with significant under-reporting – that is employees who do not
make a declaration when they are involved in an accident. So there’s no point in
trying to make impossible comparisons. “Furthermore, Eurostat has even stopped
producing statistics on occupational illnesses, where the
comparisons were even less meaningful”, stresses Raphaël Haeflinger. These
statistics have an obvious value in transnational companies: they show how the
heterogeneity of national recognition (and compensation) systems for work-related
accidents and occupational illnesses creates an equality gap among European workers
with respect to these risks. So it makes sense to consider plugging the holes in
coverage with collective prevention systems at group level.
|
1. European
Union
Project
Agreement signed on the “mobility packet” :
on 21 January, MEPS from the European
Parliament’s Transport Committee approved the agreement on the reform of the road
transport sector signed in a trilogue between the Parliament’s negotiators and the
representatives of the Council. The revised rules cover the posting
of drivers, their rest
time and cabotage
rules. Companies will have to organise their timetables so that drivers in
international freight transport are able to return home at regular intervals (every
three or four weeks depending on the work schedule) (see press
release from the Transport Committee). The text is still to be approved by
the Council and by the European Parliament in plenary session. However, given the
highly sensitive nature of this matter, the final vote by the two institutions is
not a foregone conclusion.
|
2. Member
States
Germany
A “World of Work Council” :
on 21 January, the Federal Minister Hubertus
Heil launched the World of Work Council (Rat der Arbeitswelt) to inform and
advise the minister and political decision-makers, companies and the public about
changes affecting the world of work. This body is made up of 11 members, social
sciences experts and representatives from the world of work, including Frank
Bsirske, former president of the services trade union Ver.di, and Sinischa Horvart,
who among other things is the secretary of the BASF European Works Council. (see press
release)
|
Spain
- Minimum wage : the
government and social partners have agreed to increase the national minimum wage
by 5.5% from 900 to 950 euros a month (in 14 instalments) which, over 12 months,
represents a monthly salary of 1,108.33 euros.
|
Finland
- Wage agreement in the technology industry :
after several months of negotiations punctuated with
strikes, the new collective agreement for the technology industry (which covers
metal working) was accepted on 4 January. It will bring a 3.3 per cent pay
increase and the agreement is for 25 months. It covers some 93,000 employees and
paves the way for negotiations in other sectors. Furthermore, the new agreement
removes a measure from the Competitiveness Pact (which was adopted in 2016,
under pressure from the conservative government of Prime Minister Sipilä) which
increased annual employee working time by 24 unpaid hours (see information
on the Trade Union News website).
> For
further information: an analysis
of the measures of the 2016 Competitiveness Pact in Trade Union News
|
Hungary
- Childcare allowance for grandparents :
as of 1 January, grandparents are entitled
to a childcare allowance for their grandchildren in, among others, the following
circumstances: 1. The child must be over one year old; 2. It should be looked
after at home, not in a nursery; 3. The parents must decline the parental
childcare allowance and agree to it being paid to the grandparent. The maximum
allowance is around 700 euros a month.
|
France
Pension reform :
on 24 January, the government adopted two bills
to reform the pensions system (see press
release from the Council of Ministers): a bill
for an organic law and a bill
for an ordinary law, along with an impact
assessment. When consulted with regard to these texts, the Conseil d’Etat
(Council of State) delivered a very critical opinion
on them, and particularly on the haste with which they were drawn up. The trade
union confederations all continue to oppose this reform which, in their view, is
being pushed through by the government to drive down pensions in the medium term and
undermine the pay-as-you-go pensions system under the pretext of protecting it.
|
3.
Companies
European
Works Councils
Observers for countries outside the EU :
on 16 December 2019, the management of the Norwegian company
Adevinta, which was demerged
from the Schibsted group so as to bring its online classified ads websites together
in an independent company, signed an agreement
to set up a European Works Council. Of the 20 members of the European Works
Council, 11 represent EU Member States or countries in the European Economic Area
(EEE). The others are seven observer members for the non-EU/EEE countries (Belarus,
Chile, Colombia, Morocco, Mexico, Dominican Republic, Tunisia) and two are from
joint ventures, either within or outside the EU/EEE. It should also be noted that
the secretary receives the same documents as the members of the company’s board. The
secretary is also the deputy employee representative on the company’s board. The
agreement is supplemented by a highly informative appendix which, among other
things, sets out the consultation process and the circumstances in which the
European Works Council is consulted.
|
Creation after a merger : the
management of the American services company
DXC technology (130,000 employees) has signed an agreement
to set up a European Works Council in the group which was created as a
result of the merger, in 2017, of CSC and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise’s Enterprise
Services division. The agreement sets up a European Works Council with a maximum of
25 members, appointed by countries which have at least 100 employees. The council
meets twice a year. The British representatives will become observer members after
Brexit. The text, which is very similar to the subsidiary requirements of the
directive, is subject to Irish law.
|
New council in the Czech Republic :
in December 2019, the Czech energy group EPH (25,000 employees)
signed an agreement
to set up a European Works Council. The group has a presence in Germany,
Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. The council, which has a
maximum of 25 members, meets once a year. Its select committee, which is made up of
6 members, meets 2 to 4 times a year. The agreement provides for simultaneous
interpreting during meetings, the possibility of undertaking training and of setting
up committees when necessary.
|
Global Works
Council
New Global Works Council : As
announced in IR Notes
no. 133, the French tyre manufacturer Michelin (125,000 employees) and
the IndustriAll Global Union federation signed an agreement
on 27 January on a Michelin Global Works Council. We have, therefore, put this
agreement online.
|
Trade
unionism
Tax avoidance :
a report
(summary)
published by the NGO Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability and
Research (CICTAR), and compiled by the European
Public Service union EPSU and the PSI international trade union federation,
describes the tax-avoidance schemes employed by the German healthcare group
Fresenius (290,000 employees)
to avoid paying tax where it makes profits. Whereas it mainly conducts its business
in countries with a tax rate of at least 30%, the group’s global tax rate in 2018,
according to its own declarations, was only 18.2%. The trade-union federations see
the report as additional evidence to force Fresenius management to open negotiations
on the signing of a global framework agreement on fundamental rights (see press
releases from UNI
Global Union, EPSU)
in a group which is condemned by its unions for its anti-union practices and the
weakness of its social dialogue.
|
4. Studies
and reports
A new snapshot of European Works Councils :
the most recent survey
published by the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) confirms what is often heard
among members of European Works Councils: more than 72% of the European Works
Council members questioned believe that they are generally consulted after a
decision has been finalised by the employer (43.2%), or during the implementation
process (19.5%) or even after its implementation (9.7%). In conclusion, only 21% of
members said that they are consulted before the final decision is taken, as required
by EU law. “For a meaningful consultation to take place”, the survey’s authors
Romuald Jagodzinski and Stan De Spiegelaere point out, “the EWC needs to be informed
and consulted before final decisions are taken. If not, the results of consultation
have hardly any potential to be taken into account in the decision-making process
and thereafter to influence company decisions”. So this way of going about things
does not come close to respecting the spirit of the directive on European Works
Councils. The survey, which was conducted to mark the 25th anniversary of the EWC
directive, was published at the beginning of January. It is the largest survey
conducted to date among representatives of European Works Councils and European
Company Works Councils. The survey documents the responses of 1,600 European Works
Council members, or almost 10% of the estimated number of European Works Council
members (18,000), representing 365 councils. The study highlights a degree of
“ramping-up” of European Works Councils, which is chiefly reflected in the fact that
52% of councils meet at least twice a year (rather than the annual meeting provided
for in the subsidiary requirements defined in the directive). One council in ten
even meets at least three times a year. Furthermore, 87.8% of members say they have
a select committee. About half of these select committees meet between two and four
times a year. Compared to a previous survey conducted in 2008, and although
comparisons should be treated with caution, it seems that European Works Councils
meet more often, and that more members believe they can influence their employer’s
decisions. And another interesting fact is revealed – the European Works Council is
a relatively non-confrontational body: 15.7% of members say they have experienced a
serious dispute with their employer in the last three years. Of these, only 16% took
legal action to assert their rights.
|
|
|