 |
| |
IR Notes 19 – 5 November 2014
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
IR Perspectives by Fernando Vasquez
lawyer, former official of the European Commission and expert member of
the IR Share network
In the institutional and legal framework of
the EU, the primacy of social development as the ultimate goal of
political action is far from depending solely – or even principally
– on European endeavours. Much is still determined by national or
regional powers.
Diminished social competence.
Upon reading the
Treaty, the responsibilities of the EU for social affairs are very
modest. However, the increased powers of economic governance
assigned to Europe in recent years have ultimately made up for the
limited scope of purely social means. From now on, the EU will
increasingly influence the evolution of national social systems,
whose autonomy will become illusory.
Immense power of influence.
The great economic
freedoms, the establishment of the single market, and free and fair
competition have already had a major impact on these systems. But,
with the crisis, have come the additional demands made of the member
states in the framework of the European semester and, even more
significantly, the prescriptive measures directed at the countries
which have received “assistance”, which show that the power of the
EU in connection with social issues is in fact huge.
Need to restore
balance. This
development highlights the need to conduct the debate on restoring
the balance between economic and social issues, which must be one of
the first challenges facing the new team in the college of
commissioners responsible for social questions. This discussion must
cover both the social implications and dimensions of economic
policies, as well as those measures which are purely social. These
had inevitably been condemned to restraint, given the shortage of
resources and lack of ambition on the part of the Commission – or at
least of the preceding Commission, which had accepted the idea of a
social hiatus demanded by the BusinessEurope European employers’
organisation.
As the new term in office gets under way,
preliminary questions must be addressed in three areas of
significant concern.
1.
Awareness of the loss of autonomy. Will the
assertion that the social influence of European institutions and
policies goes well beyond the limited scope of the social chapter of
the Treaty be acknowledged, explained and fully accepted by all the
European and national political players, including the citizens?
Will the latter be more able to understand that their living and
working conditions depend as much on Europe as on their governments?
That their social systems are each day losing autonomy to an EU
whose economic and political integration is progressively expanding?
That the “social state” will be European, or it will not be? And
will this recognition result in attention and renewed participation
in European affairs? This will already mark a profound shift and,
perhaps, the beginning of genuine European citizenship.
2. A
commitment awaiting confirmation. In formal
and procedural terms, what will be the actual effect of the signals
sent out in recent months – and acclaimed by the European trade
unions – geared towards strengthening social arbitration within the
process of economic governance? Will the two vice-presidents of the
Commission with whom the Commissioner for Social Affairs will share
her responsibilities (and also theirs) send out a strong message
about the importance of social issues, or will they remain the
guardians of budgetary orthodoxy? As for the European social
partners, will they make a real contribution to economic
governance?
3.
Greater honesty in providing justification.
Finally, as regards the content of guidelines and policies, will the
players be able to explain and demonstrate to the citizens the
essential nature of social regression? That it is necessary for
insecurity at work and poverty to increase, and that human dignity
must suffer proportionately so that our economies can prosper and
our nations survive? Will such a demonstration then be backed up by
figures, which have never really been provided seriously so far?
Will the European institutions be capable of truly legitimising
every measure whose effect is to curtail rights in the same way that
they (rightly) explain to businesses and the other economic actors
all the initiatives likely to affect them by way of a quantified
impact analysis? How can the tide of peoples towards
anti-Europeanism be stemmed without this minimum level of decency in
terms of transparency and pedagogy?
If answers are forthcoming to these
challenges, the meaning of the measures which will emerge in the
months and years to come may, perhaps, become intelligible to others
than just those who produce them.
|
|
|
|
| |
Diary
6-7
November Paris DARES, in
collaboration with CEPREMAP, is organising an international conference
entitled “European
and American labor markets in the crisis “.
14 November Paris 31st
colloquium of the “Droit social” labour law journal, on “Labour
law and the quality of working life “.
20-21
November Vienna 4th
Congress of the European Federation of Food, Agriculture and Tourism
Trade Unions (EFFAT).
27-28 November Brussels Seminar
organised by the European Commission and the OECD on “Job quality,
labour market performance and well-being in the workplace”.
28
November Bordeaux Sciences-Po
Bordeaux university is organising its 4th EU Day, with a round-table on
“The European social model and the challenge of competitiveness”, led by
Marcel Grignard, president of the Confrontations Europe think-tank with,
among others, the European MEPs Alain Lamassoure and Robert Rochefort,
and the former head of DG Employment and Social Affairs of the European
Commission, Odile Quintin.
2
December Paris 12th
conference of the COR (Conseil d’Orientation des Retraites) (French
pensions advisory council) entitled “Retirement
systems, demographic trends and economic growth“, including
presentations by experts on the response of the German and Swedish
systems to these challenges.
17
December Paris The French
association Europe and Society, together with RDS (Réalités du dialogue
social), is organising another conference in the series dedicated to
European social dialogue. The focus of this session is on the role of
employers’ organisations in the development of European sectoral social
dialogue.
12 – 13
February Paris The European
social partners of the civil aviation sector are organising a conference
presenting the results of the study conducted by Ghent University on
“non-standard employment of air crews” commissioned by the social
partners.
|
|
|
|
| |
IR Notes
is a fortnightly newsletter produced by
IR Share and
its network of experts, and is available in several European
languages. It offers Europe-wide monitoring of employment law,
labour relations and employment policy. It is available by
subscription for 15 euros per month ; 150 euros per year (excluding
tax), via the IR Share
website. IR Share is a privately- owned,
independent, apolitical company whose aim is to inform and assist
all players involved in social dialogue within and outside Europe.
It has been the correspondent organisation for France and Luxembourg
of the Dublin Foundation since 2009 and for Bulgaria since
2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lead
story
“Europe’s
challenges cannot wait”
Under this slogan the new European Commission, under the presidency of the former
prime minister of Luxembourg Jean-Claude Juncker, assumed its duties on 31 October
last for a five-year term of office which will run until 31 October 2019. “Now it’s
time to roll up the sleeves and get down to work,” Jean-Claude Juncker explains.
“Europe’s challenges cannot wait” The Commission is therefore going to get on with
implementing the programme, presented on 15 July before the European Parliament, in
support of “Jobs,
Growth,
Fairness and Democratic Change“. Its first priority will therefore be to
launch a public and private investment programme worth 300 billion euros in order to
stimulate investment and create jobs. In his Agenda, which contains nine other
priorities, such as that of raising industry’s contribution of 16% to the EU’s GDP
to 20% by 2020, Jean-Claude Juncker has also confirmed the importance of the free
movement of workers, which he will continue to “defend, while accepting the right of
national authorities to fight abuse or fraudulent claims”. He wishes to promote
labour mobility “especially in fields with persistent vacancies and skills
mismatches”, while at the same time announcing a “a targeted review” of the posting
of workers directive “to ensure that social dumping has no place in the European
Union”. “In our Union, the same work at the same place should be remunerated in the
same manner,” he declared. In other respects, echoing the reflections of Fernando
Vasquez alongside in his Perspectives column, Jean-Claude Juncker proposed “that, in
the future, any support and reform programme goes not only through a fiscal
sustainability assessment; but through a social impact assessment as well”. As key
measures, “the social effects of structural reforms need to be discussed in public,
and the fight against poverty must be a priority”. What now remains is for these
proposals to be translated into concrete actions as fast as possible.
|
1. European
Union
Social
update
- Assistance from the European Globalisation
Adjustment Fund: The European Commission on 28 October
2014 proposed to grant 1.8 million euros to Italy from the European
Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to help 608 employees laid off by Whirlpool
Europe S.r.l. to find new jobs (see Commission press
release).
It also, on 24 October, proposed to provide aid of 918,000 euros from the EGF to
760 employees made redundant by Gad abattoirs in France (see Commission press
release).
|
Sectoral
social dialogue
- Commitment to apprenticeships in the food
and drink sector: The European social partners in the
food industry – FoodDrinkEurope and
the EFFAT (European Federation of Food,
Agriculture and Tourism Trade Unions) – have adopted a joint initiative (“Youth
apprenticeships pledge“) to encourage high quality apprenticeships and
traineeships in food and drink manufacturing companies across Europe (see EFFAT
press release, in English).
|
2. Member
states
France
- Posted worker controls to be stepped up:
The Minister of Labour, François Rebsamen, on 27 October
2014 announced that the resources available to the labour inspectorate to combat
abuses linked to the posting of workers are to be reinforced, with “tougher
penalties, and the option of stopping the work being undertaken by the company
which is in breach of the law on posted workers”. In other respects, it will
become compulsory for employees working in the construction sector to carry an
ID card, as is already the case in several European countries (e.g. Belgium,
Finland, Luxembourg). Finally, the decrees implementing law No. 2014-790 of
10 July 2014 aimed at fighting against unfair social competition should be
published this November.
|
Germany
- Move towards modifying the right to
strike: The Labour Minister, Andrea Nahles (SPD), on 28
October presented a draft law (“Tarifeinheitsgesetz”), whose aim is to modify
the right to strike. The text, which should be adopted by the German cabinet on
3 December, and subsequently by parliament by summer 2015, comes in response to
the situation whereby two rival unions within a company – a relatively rare
scenario in Germany’s industrial relations system – can negotiate a collective
agreement applicable to the same population of employees. If the unions are
unable to resolve their differences, the text provides for the majority
organisation alone to sign the collective agreement. If the parties cannot agree
on which is the majority organisation, a tribunal will be tasked with
determining which trade union represents the larger number of employees, which
finally will have the power to sign the collective agreement. As a result, since
the right to strike is linked to the defence of the collective agreement at the
time of its renewal, the overall effect is that it will only be possible for the
majority trade union to call a strike. One of the objectives is to limit
industrial disputes by professional groups in businesses where a minority union
can paralyse the company. In an oral
presentation (in German), Andrea Nahles insists that the new law is not
designed to restrict the right to strike or to threaten the existence of smaller
trade unions, but is intended to strengthen the autonomy of the social partners,
in particular by giving greater weight to the unions which represent the
majority of employees in a company.
|
Portugal
- Reform of the system of collective
bargaining : Law No. 55/2014 of 25 August
2014, which entered force on 1 September 2014, has modified the Labour
Code. The law contains measures which facilitate the termination of collective
agreements and allow employers to suspend a collective agreement if the business
is experiencing economic difficulties. This derogation is permissible provided
that this step is necessary to ensure the company’s viability and to safeguard
jobs. It must be formalised by an agreement between the employer and the
employee representatives.
|
3. Companies
European
works councils
Alstom: The European Works
Forum (EWF) of the French Alstom group on 28 October 2014 gave its opinion on the
sale of the company’s power division to the American General Electric group, in
keeping with the timetable established in a European
agreement signed on 28 August between the management of Alstom and the EWF,
represented by its secretary, Kai Müller (IG Metall) and its deputy secretary,
Daniel Garcia-Molina (CC.OO). The document gives details of the resources provided
to the EWF to follow this bid, in particular concerning the commissioning of an
expert, as well as the calendar of different information and consultation meetings.
In a press
release the European Works Forum threatened not to issue its verdict at the
meeting on 28 October, which could have led to the sale process being obstructed.
Some of its members, including the secretary, were in particular demanding an
agreement on maintaining employees’ jobs for a period of three years, which General
Electric refused. Finally, an accommodation was reached. Indeed, a charter
was presented the same day by the management teams of Alstom and General Electric,
which undertake in particular to continue the information and consultation process
within the EWF until the deal is closed. As regards the fate of the European works
councils, a negotiation is due to start on reducing the size of Alstom’s European
Works Forum following the departure of 65,000 employees to General Electric, while
the American group also agrees to commence talks on setting up a European works
council for its activities in the EU.
- Chèque Déjeuner: The
French cooperative group Chèque Déjeuner (2,300 employees) on 4 November 2014
signed an agreement
relating to the establishment of a European works council with the trade
union organisations CGT, CFDT, FO (France), CGIL (Italy), UGT, CCOO (Spain) and
UNI-Europa, as announced by the AFP Liaisons press agency (31.10.). The EWC,
which met the same day, comprises nine members who will represent the group’s
2,300 employees, 1,300 of whom work outside France.
- Lafarge/Holcim: In
conjunction with the European Federation of Building and Woodworkers (EFBWW),
the two select committees of the European works councils of the Lafarge et
Holcim cement groups, which are in the process of merging, on 9 October 2014
published a statement
to call for “the establishment of a social contract between the directors of the
Lafarge and Holcim groups, the buyers, and the trade unions representing the
employees”. The statement underscores that “social guarantees for employees and
conditions conducive to high-quality social dialogue are prerequisites that must
be taken into account in the disposal plans, alongside the economic and
financial conditions” in connection with the merger. The organisations are
calling for a number of assurances in terms of job security and regarding
employees’ status. The employee representatives are likewise demanding a
“guarantee that the buyer recognises the trade unions and has not been guilty of
blacklisting in the past”.
|
Transnational agreements
- Salini Impregilo: The
management of the Italian construction group Salini Impregilo SpA (31,000
employees), formed by the merger of Salini and Impregilo, on 13 October 2014
signed an international framework agreement with the Building and Wood Workers’
International federation (BWI) and its Italian affiliates (Feneal UIL, Fica
CISL, Fillea CGIL). (See BWI press
release)
|
Trade
unions
- Prosegur: The UNI Global
Union international trade union federation on 7 October 2014 filed a complaint
against the Spanish private security firm Prosegur with the Office of the United
Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and requested its intervention. UNI
denounces the physical attacks perpetrated on trade unionists in Columbia and
Peru (see UNI Global Union press
release).
|
4. Studies
and reports
- No improvement on the unemployment front
in September: In the euro area, the unemployment rate
was 11.5% in September 2014 according to Eurostat (see press
release) – stable compared with August 2014, but down from 12% in
September 2013. The EU28 unemployment rate was 10.1% in September 2014 – also
stable compared with August 2014, but down from 10.8% in September 2013.
|
Phrase of
the fortnight
A European
strike
As in Germany (see Member states section), the countries of the EU guarantee the
right to strike, even if the latter’s implementation is sometimes very highly
regulated, either because its exercise is limited to a given period (on the model of
the industrial peace clauses in Germany which prohibit the use of strikes unless
collective agreements are being renegotiated) or because the trade unions have to
adhere to an extremely strict procedure to be sure that a majority of the employees
supports the strike call (as in Great Britain). On the other hand, at EU level, the
right to strike is guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European
Union. However, in keeping with the EU Treaty, the EU is not competent to legislate
on this matter. If collective, pan-European action has taken place in the past, as
in 2002 in the air traffic control sector for instance, to oppose plans of the
European Commission, each action at national level must respect that country’s
legislation relating to the right to strike. There is no “European right” to conduct
a transnational strike, either at country or sector or at multinational level. To
find out more, consult the European
Industrial Relations Dictionary (in English).
|
|
|