|
| |
IR Notes 205 – 5 April 2023
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
A question for…
Tom Hayes, Executive Director, BEERG consultancy group
You’ve been advising multinational
companies on industrial relations for many years. Why is it that
so many companies are relocating their European Works Council to
Ireland (a situation highlighted in the previous edition of
IR
Notes
? Is it because of the problems faced by EWCs in
accessing justice there?
No, absolutely not! The reason why so many
EWCs have moved to Ireland is because in the wake of Brexit, a large
number of multinational companies – which are often US companies –
have had to select a different EU Member State in which to locate
their representative agent on the company’s EWC. These companies are
looking for just one thing: a legal environment that they
understand. So naturally, they opted for Ireland, both for language
reasons and because its legal system is similar to that of the UK.
Imagine an American management team that has to resolve a legal
dispute with a EWC: it would sooner defend itself in a language that
it understands, and read all of the court documents in English.
Honestly, none of our clients are satisfied with the current
legislation, and they have given me permission to say so. Three
years ago, we published a note written by Kevin Duffy, the former Chair of
the Irish Labour Court, highlighting the shortcomings in Irish law.
The solution, which was shared with all stakeholders, including the
trade unions, is a very simple one. All that needs to be done is to
align the law governing European Works Councils with the existing
provisions governing labour law disputes, by opening up access to
mediation through the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) and, if
this doesn’t solve the dispute, allowing the case to be referred to
the Labour Court. The employers are in favour of this idea. At the
present time, nobody understands why there is such an impasse at
government level, even though the solution is so simple. If the
European Commission doesn’t receive an answer very soon, there is
every likelihood that it will launch a formal infringement procedure
against Ireland.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Diary
25 April
Vienna Final
conference of an EU-funded project organised by the construction
industry social partners (EFBWW and FIEC) on the theme of “Better
Functioning of the European Labour Market“.
28 April
Budapest
International conference on “decent work in the digital age”, organised
by the Labour Law Department of Pázmány Péter Catholic University, with
the support of Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Budapest (information).
3-4 May Stockholm
Informal meeting of Ministers of Employment and Social Affairs.
12 June Luxembourg
Employment and Social Policy Council.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Who we are?
IR Notes is a
fortnightly newsletter produced by IR Share and its
network of experts, and is available in several European languages
(English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). It offers Europe-wide
monitoring of employment law, labour relations and employment policy. It
is available by subscription for 18 euros per month .
The team This issue
was producaed by Pascale
Turlan and Frédéric
Turlan. Find out more
about the IR
Share team on our website.
Subscribe to IR Notes
Via the IR
Share website or by calliang us on: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95
or E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
Legal notice.
Publisher: IR Share SARL – 5, Les Compères – 89520 Fontenoy, France –
Tel.: +33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 – share capital 1,500 euros – commercial
register (RCS Auxerre): 512 567 959. Managing editor: Frédéric Turlan.
Hosting: Ideal prod – 14 rue Auguste Morel – 89100 Sens – France –
Tel.: + 33 (0)3 86 83 21 21. CPPAP no.: 0626 Z 93933.
|
|
|
 |
| |
!!! Follow us on LinkedIn! !!!
Why not connect to the IR Notes LinkedIn page, so that you can keep up with
developments in the issues we’re covering, between two editions?
You’re welcome to follow us! There are already 238 of you
following us!
|
|
|
 |
| |
European Industrial Relations Dictionary
In case reading IR Notes inspires you to
explore this subject further, we are providing links to the European
Industrial Relations Dictionary published by Eurofound. This is updated at
regular intervals by IR Share, which publishes IR Notes. The term
definitions are available in English and can easily be converted
into other languages using on-line translation tools.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Lead
story
Greater
transparency will mean less wage discrimination
Just over two years after the European Commission put forward its proposal (see IR Notes 159), the
European Parliament has definitively adopted the directive
on pay transparency (see press
release and Pay transparency). The
directive now has to be approved by the Council before it is published in the OJEU.
Member States will then have three years to transpose the directive into their
domestic law. And the employers will not have very long to prepare for this
directive, which introduces many changes. Its flagship measure is the introduction
of a new obligation requiring employers to produce a report on their gender pay-gap
data, including on its “complementary or variable components” (Article 9). Companies
with more than 150 employees will have to prepare the report four years after the
directive enters into force. This exercise will then have to be repeated annually by
companies with at least 250 employees, and once every three years by those with
between 150 and 249 employees. Companies with between 100 and 149 employees, for
their part, will have to compile this report within eight years from now, then do so
again once every three years. This mechanism is supplemented by a “joint pay
assessment” that must be performed in conjunction with workers’ representatives in
circumstances where: 1/ the report demonstrates “a difference in the average pay
level between female and male workers of at least 5% in any category of workers”. 2/
The employer has failed to justify this difference on the basis of objective,
gender-neutral criteria. 3/ The employer has not remedied this unjustified
difference (…) within six months of the report’s publication date (Article 10).
One recital of the directive states that “If there are no workers’ representatives,
they should be designated by workers for the purpose of the joint pay
assessment”. The directive requires employers to have “pay structures ensuring
equal pay” and to use gender-neutral job evaluation and classification systems
(Article 4). It also confers a number of direct rights. Applicants for employment
shall have the right to receive information about the level of “initial pay or its
range” for the position concerned (Article 5). Once they are in post, workers shall
have the right “to request and receive in writing” information “on their individual
pay level and the average pay levels, broken down by sex, for categories of workers
performing the same work as them or work of equal value to theirs” (Article 7). In
addition, contractual terms that prevent workers from disclosing information about
their pay will be prohibited. The directive introduces a reversal of the burden of
proof in cases where the employer has not discharged its pay transparency
obligations or the employee establishes “facts from which it may be presumed that
there has been direct or indirect discrimination”. The directive introduces stronger
penalties, facilitates access to justice and establishes a right to claim
compensation or reparation. Lastly, it introduces into EU law the concept of
intersectional discrimination, which is “discrimination based on a combination of
sex and any other ground or grounds of discrimination]”.
> Find out more:
The gender pay gap in the EU fell from 16.4% in 2012 to 12.7% in
2021 (see Eurostat
data, a European Parliament briefing
and Gender pay gap).
|
1. European
Union
Social
update
Strengthening social dialogue :
The European Parliament’s Committee on Employment and Social
Affairs has prepared a draft
motion for a resolution on strengthening social dialogue which it is
expected to pass later this month, on 26 April. The scope of the text is vast –
reacting to the European Commission’s proposals to strengthen social dialogue (see
IR Notes 201),
while at the same time calling new directives to be passed in the field of social
affairs. In a letter
sent on 27 March to the members of this committee, eight sectoral employers’
organisations expressed strong opposition to everything that might hamper the
autonomy of the social partners, such as setting a target of reaching 90% collective
bargaining coverage, as proposed by the draft motion, arguing that this implies
“interference” by the authorities in the wage-setting process. “We’re in favour of
social dialogue and collective bargaining, but if they are to be strengthened, this
must be done via the social partners”, explains Delphine Rudelli, Director General
of Ceemet, who is one of the eight signatories of the motion (see Strengthening collective
bargaining). The employers also call on the Commission to refrain
from proposing new legislation in the field of information and consultation of
workers, and take the view that the EWC directive is “appropriate in its current
form”.
|
Sectoral
social dialogue
Telecoms : On 15 March, the
social partners in the telecommunications sector adopted a joint
statement condemning all violence and harassment in the workplace. The text
calls on social partners in branches and companies to negotiate “appropriate support
and safety measures for victims of domestic violence” and to organise information
and training sessions (see Harassment and violence at
work).
|
2. Member
States
Denmark
Sexual harassment : On 23 March,
Parliament passed a law on
sexual harassment, implementing the tripartite agreement concluded on this
subject in March 2022. The government emphasises that the text is intended to
support the “necessary cultural change in every workplace”. The law imposes an
obligation on employers “to provide an environment in which work can be carried out
free of harassment, and to deal with incidents of sexual harassment”. It also allows
the victim to seek compensation from the employees who have committed the offence
(see press
release).
|
Spain
Mental health : The Minister of
Employment, Yolanda Díaz, has presented a report
on insecure employment and mental health. She stresses that this report “also sends
a message, loud and clear, that mental health is linked to inequality and reminds us
that the impact on mental health is more than twice as acute among workers in the
least secure jobs, and that the worst situation is to be seen among women,
immigrants and young people”. The committee that wrote the report advocates
conditions that will provide better protection, health and care for workers, and the
introduction of a “mental health system that is universal, fair, free to use, human
and of high quality” (see press
release). The experts emphasise that the informal economy, precarious
employment, decentralised forms of organisation of production, and underestimating
the need to look after employees are some of the causes of the deterioration in
mental health, but they also emphasis that, even where employees are on stable
contracts, the issues of digital disconnection, overtime and unpredictable working
hours all have a negative impact.
|
France
Pension reform :
Despite widespread social unrest and a united
trade union movement, the government has managed to pass an amending finance law for
the social security system, which is designed to reform the country’s retirement
pension arrangements. The government used a provision of the Constitution (Article
49.3) to make this bill
an issue of its responsibility, and the reform was deemed to be approved on 20 March
(see legislative
dossier). Before it can enter into force, it must be promulgated by the
French President, provided that, on 14 April this year, the Constitutional Council
rules that this law is not in breach of the Constitution (see press
release). The main measures are as follows: 1/ Starting on 1 September 2023,
the legal retirement age will be gradually raised to 64, at the rate of an
additional three months per year, based on a person’s year of birth, until it
reaches 64 in 2030. 2/ Speeding up the timetable stipulated by the previous pension
reform for extending the term of the pension contributions payable in order to
qualify for a full pension. The 43 years’ worth of contributions will now be
required with effect from 2027 (instead of 2035), representing an increase at the
rate of three months per year (instead of three months once every three years). 3/
The age at which contributors can take a full retirement pension (without any
reduction in payments being applicable), will remain at 67. 4/ Various measures are
being introduced to adapt the arrangements for employees who have had a long career
and those taking early retirement. 5/ Several special regimes are being abolished
for new recruits (e.g. those previously applicable to the RATP [Paris Transport
Authority], the electricity and gas industries, etc.). 6/ A minimum pension is
stipulated for employees who have completed a career of full-time work. 7/ To
encourage the employment of older workers, the law provides for a “seniors index”
that will require companies to evaluate their current practices in terms of
retaining (and recruiting) older workers, similar to the existing gender equality
legislation. The law imposes an obligation on the social partners to negotiate a
national agreement on employment of older workers. If this agreement is not reached,
the government will experiment with a specific (‘CDI senior’) contract of
employment, i.e. an ‘older worker’s permanent contract’, on which lower social
security contributions are payable.
|
Ireland
A plan to combat racism : On 21
March, the government unveiled a
national action plan against racism. It contains initiatives in the field of
employment, such as the creation of a workers’ and employers’ guide for combating
racism and promoting racial equality in the workplace across all sectors, with an
associated awareness campaign. The plan will also introduce specific measures aimed
at sectors and workplaces where minority ethnic groups are under-represented, and
for sectors and workplaces where they are over-represented. (see press
release).
|
Italy
Wholesale inspection of couriers :
huge nationwide operation took place on 24 March, inspecting the
credentials of delivery riders employed by food delivery platforms. The aim is to
protect delivery riders against new forms of exploitation, known as “illegal digital
recruitment”, which involve making transfers from one account to another, in order
to gain access to delivery platforms, in return for paying the account holder a
percentage of the delivery rider’s daily income. This phenomenon only affects
foreign workers. The operation revealed that 11% of foreign delivery riders are
working within the framework of account transfers (see press release issued by the
Ministry
of Employment and a more detailed document published by the Carabinieri).
|
Romania
Strengthening collective bargaining :
The government has reconsidered the social dialogue reform of
2011, which eradicated collective bargaining at national level and downgraded the
role of branch agreements in favour of decentralised collective bargaining at
companies with more than 21 employees. This move prompted the collapse of collective
bargaining coverage from 100% to a level of approximately 32% (see Living and working in
Romania). Pursuant to the major reform of social dialogue and
collective bargaining passed by Law 367/2022 of
19 December 2022 (see AFSRU Article),
the government has just increased the number of sectors permitted to negotiate
collective bargaining agreements from 30 to 58 (see press
release). The government has also adopted a draft
order supplementing and amending the Law of 19 December 2022.
|
3. Third
countries
Norway
Redeployment obligation : On 17
March, the Parliament (the Storting) passed an amendment to the working environment
legislation, whereby companies forming part of a group are required to offer a
suitable position and give priority to workers who are affected by redundancies in
other parts of their group and are seeking a new job. This broader redeployment
obligation, which is intended to “strengthen job protection for employees”,
according to the Minister of Employment, will enter into force on 1 January 2024
(see press
release).
|
United
Kingdom
Long Covid : On 27 March, the
TUC trade union confederation published a survey of just over 3,000 people, on the
impact of long Covid. The number of people stating that they were suffering from
long Covid has risen from 970,000 in August 2021 to two million, according to the
latest study
by the Office for National Statistics. The survey shows that 14% of people who
self-reported long Covid, lost their job. The TUC is calling for urgent measures to
ensure that people suffering from long Covid are properly protected, and is putting
forward a number of recommendations, including the introduction of reasonable
adjustments for the workers concerned (see press
release).
- Women’s health: On 14
March, the TUC trade union confederation published a report on Women’s
health and the workplace, putting forward numerous recommendations
concerning menstruation and the menopause, pregnancy, maternal health in the
workplace and women’s participation in the labour market.
|
4.
Companies
European
Works Councils
New EWCs : The US group Google has signed an agreement
to set up a EWC covering its employees in the EU, the UK and Switzerland (the
latter, together with Ireland, are the three largest European country operations for
Google). The EWC’s first meeting will take place in six months’ time, after the
phase involving elections and appointments of members (see UNI Europa press
release). Another EWC has been created at the agricultural machinery and
construction equipment manufacturer CNH
Industrial, following the Iveco demerger (see trade unions’
press
release). Lastly, the French biotechnology company Biomérieux (5,127 employees in
the EU) signed an EWC
agreement on 16 January, which follows on from previous agreements.
|
5. Studies
and reports
Accidents at work sustained while teleworking :
On 31 March, Eurogip published a report
comparing the rules applicable to accidents at work that take place during
teleworking periods, in seven European countries (Austria, Finland, France, Germany,
Italy, Spain, Sweden). In each of the countries examined, among other things, the
report offers an insight into the regulations in force and the obligations
applicable in terms of health and safety in the workplace around teleworking; the
rules applicable to accidents at work that occur during teleworking; and the
associated case law.
|
Compliance with the European Social Charter: :
On 22 March, the European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR)
published its Conclusions 2022 in respect of 33 States, regarding compliance with
the European Social Charter relating to Labour Rights. This exercise shows whether
Council of Europe member countries are properly applying a number of the Charter’s
articles. As part of this work, the ECSR publishes a report on each country, whose
conclusions may be useful for legal experts and social partners at national level.
The most common breaches of the Charter noted by the ECSR include insufficient
promotion of collective bargaining mechanisms and the absence of an effective right
for employees to participate in the decision-making process within the undertaking
about working conditions, work organisation and the working environment. The ECSR
adds that the obligation to promote “awareness, information and prevention of sexual
harassment in the workplace or in relation to work, and to take all appropriate
measures to protect workers from such conduct” (Article 26) extends to online
harassment (see summary
fact sheet, summary
of the report and press
release with links to country reports).
|
AI and management by algorithm :
On 16 March, the German NGO AlgorithmWatch, with the support of
the Hans Böckler Foundation, published a study
advocating that workforce representatives should be more closely involved in the
deployment of AI and automated decision-making systems, from the design phase
through to their deployment. The authors want to go further than either current
legislation, which puts forward a risk mitigation approach, or “trade union
discussions focus[ed] on addressing … ethical standards”. “… a step toward more
practice- and process-oriented approaches is urgently needed” by “empower[ing]
employees in the face of algorithmic decision-making”, via “transparency
requirements, support for co-participatory governance approaches, or funding for
ADM-focused training programmes for employee representatives”.
|
|
|