|
| |
IR Notes 54 – 18 May 2016
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
Who we are?
IR Share is a
provider that shares information, documentation and expertise for HR
managers and employee representatives. The IR Share agency operates by
way of online publications, working groups, training devoted to relevant
topics and a network of experts.
The team
This issue was produced by Alain Lefebvre, Christer Thörnqvist
and Frédéric Turlan. Find out more about the IR Share team
on our website
Subscribe to IR
Notes Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on:
+33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 or
E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
|
|
|
 |
| |
Interview
Interview with Claudio Stanzani, director of SindNova
SindNova has organised a seminar this Wednesday
on 20 years of the European works council. Has this body become
a reality in Italy? In Italy, there are around forty active
European works councils. They represent approximately half of the
Italian multinationals that should legally be establishing such a
body. More than half the bodies in place have acquired significant
experience of EWC operation and in the exercise of information and
consultation rights. But a lot remains to be done, both to
disseminate this experience and to strengthen the EWC’s trade union
character and its involvement in industrial relations inside
multinationals. However, much also depends on the role of the trade
unions. In other respects, it must be pointed out that a large
number of representatives of Italian workers are also present and
active in hundreds of European works councils in businesses whose
parent company is not Italian.
Do Italian trade unions believe
that the European works council is an important body? Has their
view of this body changed? That depends a lot on the different trade
union cultures. But as a general rule, one can say that the role of
the EWC is considerably underestimated.
What actions would need to be taken
to promote European works councils in
Italy? A lot
needs to be invested in training and strengthening the European
culture of trade union leaders, but equally in training and
strengthening the skills of HR directors in multinational
companies.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
IR Notes is a fortnightly
newsletter produced by IR
Share and its network of experts, and is available in
several European languages. It offers Europe-wide monitoring of employment law,
labour relations and employment policy. It is available by subscription for 15
euros per month (excluding tax), via the IR Share website. IR Share
is a privately- owned, independent, apolitical company whose aim is to inform
and assist all players involved in social dialogue within and outside Europe. It
has been the correspondent organisation for France and Luxembourg of the Dublin
Foundation since 2009 and for Bulgaria since 2014.
|
|
|
Lead
story
Eastern
Europe rejects proposed revision of posted workers directive
Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the European Commission, has just suffered his
first setback: the national parliaments of virtually all the “new” member states
have deemed that the proposed directive aimed at imposing the principle of “equal
pay for equal work” in relation to posted workers does not respect the principle of
subsidiarity, and that the European Union should not intervene on this subject. This
principle is indeed at the heart of the legislative proposal presented in March by
the Commission (see press release).
The revision focuses on three points: 1. The remuneration of posted workers will be
the remuneration applicable to employees in the host country; this goes beyond
simply applying the minimum wage as is currently the case. 2. Temporary workers
posted to another country must be employed on the same terms and conditions as
temporary workers in the host country, that is to say there must not be any
discrimination against them in comparison with employees of user enterprises. 3. The
duration of the posting will be limited to 24 months (see IR
Notes 49). The text responds to repeated demands from several countries in
western Europe that consider the current rules that apply to posted workers (those
contained in directive 96/71) to be conducive to social dumping. Poland, which is
the prime “exporter” of posted workers in the EU, believes that the revision would
be at odds with the principle of the freedom to provide services and fears for its
effects on the competitiveness of the country’s businesses that operate in the EU by
deploying staff to work in other member states. For his part, Kalle Palling,
chairman of the European Union affairs committee of the Estonian parliament, states,
“We think that this proposal is in conflict with the principles of subsidiarity and
proportionality”. Summing up the position of the “rebel” countries, he explains that
“with other member states, we will be giving a clear signal that there is no need to
amend the posting of workers directive, and the European Commission should withdraw
its proposed directive”. With reference to the countries of western Europe, he
continues, “They speak about protecting posted workers, but actually they are
protecting their local labour market”. Consequently, at least one-third of national
parliaments (Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania,
Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Denmark) have contested the text, thus triggering the
“yellow card” procedure contained in the Treaty on the European Union which requires
the Commission to review its proposal. On the basis of this review, the Commission
may decide to maintain, amend or withdraw the proposal and must give reasons for its
decision. The Commission responded by commenting that its proposal was “balanced and
respects the principles of subsidiarity”. At European Parliament level, the
employment and social affairs committee on 10 May appointed
Elisabeth Morin-Chartier (EPP) from France, and Agnes Jongerius (S&D) from the
Netherlands, both seasoned MEPs, as joint rapporteurs to deal with this sensitive
legislation. “For the first time there are two co-rapporteurs from the same
committee, concerning what is certainly the most important directive at European
level today, and possibly of this parliamentary term,” explains Elisabeth
Morin-Chartier in an interview with the regional French newspaper Centre
Presse (13.05). The posting of workers is truly an issue that divides the
European family! > Also see the reaction of the
European social partners below.
|
1. European
Union
Legislation
- Directive on mobility inside the EU of
third-country nationals for research and study purposes:
The European Parliament on 11 May adopted a legislative
resolution in support of the Council position at first reading with a
view to the adoption of a directive on the conditions of entry and residence of
third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies, training,
voluntary service, pupil exchange schemes or educational projects and au
pairing. This vote by the European Parliament will allow the definitive adoption
of this directive, which will shortly be published in the OJEU. The legislation
will allow students and researchers in particular to stay in the EU for at least
nine months after completing their studies or research in order to look for a
job or set up a business. They will also be able to move around the EU more
easily during their stay and have the right to come with their family. For more
information, see the note
of the European Parliament (also available in Italian
and Polish).
|
Legislative
proposal
European Commission resolves to improve
workers’ protection against cancer-causing chemicals: On 13
May, the Commission proposed changes to the Carcinogens and Mutagens Directive
(2004/37/EC) to limit exposure to 13 cancer-causing chemicals at the workplace,
instead of three at present. These limit values set a maximum concentration for the
presence of a chemical carcinogen in the workplace air. The proposal in particular
includes exposure to “respirable crystalline silica” (RCS). This chemical had been
the subject of the first European multi-sectoral agreement aimed at establishing
effective worker protection without setting exposure limit values – an agreement
that has apparently not produced the hoped-for results since the Commission now
intends to set an exposure limit value in order to protect the some 5.3 million
employees exposed to this substance (see Commission press release
and the more detailed Fact Sheet).
The initiative has been welcomed by the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC).
“This is important news for the health of workers across Europe,” said Esther Lynch,
ETUC Confederal Secretary who expects “the Commission to put forward exposure limits
for at least 15 more substances by the end of the year” (see press
release). However, Laurent Vogel, a researcher at the European Trade Union
Institute (ETUI), points out that the number of chemicals covered by the legislation
“is far too few in comparison with the demands of the Dutch presidency”. Indeed, the
latter had asked the Commission to prepare the introduction of 50 OELs (occupational
exposure limits) for the first half of 2016 – a target still well short of the 71
substances or procedures which the ETUC considers should be subject to an OEL (see
ETUI press
release). > For further information, see the
documents presented by the Commission (in English): the proposal
for a directive, annex
with limit values for occupational exposure, impact
assessment, and a working paper published by the European Trade Union
Institute (free, “Cancer
risks in the workplace: better regulation, stronger protection“, in
English).
|
Social
update
- Resolution of the European Parliament on
parental leave: The European Parliament on 12 May
adopted a resolution
on the application of directive 2010/18 of 8 March 2010 implementing the
revised framework agreement on parental leave concluded by the European
social partners. The resolution recommends to the member states that all
possible measures be taken to “enable the directive to be correctly implemented,
in a uniform manner, in both the public and private sector”. The European
Parliament believes that the Commission should propose measures that “encourage
fathers to take more parental leave and that member states should promote a more
effective sharing of best practices in this field”. It should also present a new
legislative initiative “to promote the reconciliation of work and family” and
also envisage a “broad non-legislative initiative” to this end. Also of note is
the request to the Commission and to the social partners to consider offering an
“appropriate extension of the minimum duration of parental leave from four to at
least six months to improve work-life balance”. Finally, the Parliament stresses
that “an EU directive on a minimum two-week paternity leave is essential and
urgent”.
- Assistance from the European Globalisation
Adjustment Fund for Belgium: On 5 May, the European
Commission proposed to provide 1.8 million euros to Belgium from the European
Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to help 488 employees made redundant by
several manufacturers of construction machinery (Caterpillar, Carwall and
Doosan) in the province of Hainaut (Wallonia, Belgium). In addition to these
former employees, the planned measures also include support for 300 young people
not in employment, education or training (NEETs). (See Commission press
release)
|
Social
dialogue
- Reactions of the social partners to the
“yellow card” (see lead story): In a letter
(in English) to commissioner Marianne Thyssen, who is in charge of revising the
directive on the posting of workers, the General Secretary of the ETUC, Luca
Visentini, demanded that the Commission maintain its proposal and reject the
arguments of the countries that delivered the “yellow card” because the latter
were “neglecting their own workers”. “We wish to confirm,” he continued, “that
all trade unions in Europe, including those in countries whose parliaments have
supported the yellow card procedure, are strongly in favour of the revision of
the Posting of Workers Directive”. The employers’ organisation BusinessEurope
for its part declared itself as having the same opinion as the countries that
support the yellow card and called on the Commission to withdraw its proposal
(see press
release).
|
2. Member
states
Germany
Metalworkers’ pay deal: The
social partners in the metalworking sector on 13 May reached an agreement on a wage
increase of 4.8% over the coming 21 months. The 3.7 million workers employed in the
metalworking sector (in car manufacture and the machine-tool and electronic sectors)
will benefit from an initial rise of 2.8% starting on 1 July. Prior to that, they
will receive a one-off bonus of 150 euros for the months of April, May and June.
Wages will undergo a further increase of 2% from 1 April 2017. This agreement, which
was concluded in North Rhine-Westphalia, will serve as the basis for all the other
regional collective negotiations in this sector (see press
release IG Metall and press
release Gesamtmetall).
|
Poland
- Proposal for a police force dedicated to
supporting the labour inspectorate: In its last report,
the Polish labour inspectorate (PIP) noted an increase in the number of breaches
of labour law. According to its estimates, 700,000 people are thought to be
working without an employment contract; 1.1 million are bogus self-employed
workers whose status should rightly be reclassified as that of an employee,
while 1.3 million workers are subject to so-called “trash contracts” (piece-work
contracts or contracts based on the performance of a particular task) which are
not covered by the labour code. Janusz Śniadek, a member of parliament in the
governing PiS party, has raised the possibility of creating an employment police
force, which would operate as a separate agency from the PIP and could conduct
investigations prior to PIP inspections. However, the government does not
currently plan to implement this proposal.
|
3
Companies
European
works councils
- Deutsche Bahn: The
European works council of Deutsche Bahn met from 23 to 26 February in Berlin for
a plenary meeting dedicated to the restructuring of the group and the partial
privatisation of its Schenker Logistics and Arriva subsidiaries. A
cross-cultural training event was organised after the plenary (see press
release).
|
European
Companies (SE)
- Sixt Leasing: The European
Trade Union Institute has placed online the agreement on worker involvement at
Sixt Leasing (5,120 employees worldwide), which was signed on 25
February between the management of the German car hire company and a special
negotiating body. The signing of this agreement will allow the group to convert
to a European Company (SE) with effect from 1 June of this year. The agreement
provides for a committee to be established comprising a minimum of three members
and a maximum of five representatives.
|
Trade
unions
- Maersk: The International
Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) has welcomed the decision by the Danish
maritime transport group Maersk to amend its chartering agreements to include
the requirement that the charter vessel owners must undertake to apply to their
vessel an agreement that recognises the existence of trade unions and offers
protection for crews. Maersk Group operates a total of around 500 owned or
chartered vessels worldwide (see press
release).
|
4. Studies
and reports
Situation of LGBT people in the
workplace: The European Foundation for the Improvement of
Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) has published a comparative
study on the situation of LGBTs (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender
people) in the labour market based on national data collected in surveys and
obtained from Eurofound’s network of national correspondents. The document provides
a very useful insight into LGBTs’ integration in the labour market and the
initiatives taken by way of legislation or by the social partners to protect them
from discrimination or to develop a culture of tolerance at the workplace. The
article contains very instructive maps and graphics showing the feelings of LGBT
employees in the different countries, with large variations in terms of acceptance
between countries such as Denmark and the Netherlands on the one hand and certain
eastern and central European countries on the other.
- Western models of industrial relations
under the test of globalisation: This work, available in
French, contains answers from industrial relations experts from several European
countries to the question, “How has social regulation evolved in enterprises
over the past thirty years?” The book accurately assesses the principal changes
that have affected trade unions and social dialogue in enterprises particularly
in Europe, notably as a result of globalisation and “its concomitant
restructurings and economic adjustments”. The authors found the “emergence of
grey areas, that are non-regulated if not without true social rights, although
some national models, because of the socio-political cultures underpinning them,
have resisted better than others”. Edited by Dominique Andolfatto and Sylvie
Contrepois, Syndicats
et dialogue social. Les modèles occidentaux à l’épreuve contains
contributions from Vassil Kirov and Christer Thörnqvist, two regular
contributors to IR Notes.
|
|
|