|
| |
IR Notes 63 – 9 November 2016
www.irshare.eu
|
|
|
| |
| |
Who we are?
IR Share is a
provider that shares information, documentation and expertise for HR
managers and employee representatives. The IR Share agency operates by
way of online publications, working groups, training devoted to relevant
topics and a network of experts.
The team
This issue was produced by Tamas Gyulavari, Felicia Rosioru,
Frédéric Turlan and Mariangela Zito. Find out more about the
IR Share team
on our website
Subscribe to IR
Notes Via the IR
Share website or by calling us on:
+33 (0)6 81 41 53 95 or
E-mail: frederic.t@irshare.eu
|
|
|
 |
| |
Interview
Melanie Stancliffe, Partner at Irwin Mitchell LLP
Does
the ruling of the London Employment Tribunal in the Uber
case mean that all Uber drivers are regarded as
employees? No. First of all, this is a
ruling by a first-instance tribunal that other courts are not
compelled to follow. Second, in this case the tribunal concerned
itself only with the legal status of the two drivers of the company
involved in what was a test case.
What
are the consequences for the employees and for the employer
if their relationship is reclassified as an employment
contract? There are three main
consequences. First, it must be stressed that the tribunal found
that the two drivers should be considered to be “workers”, which is
a particular status in the United Kingdom. In effect, a worker is
neither an employee (who is covered by the full range of legal
protection, against unfair dismissal or redundancy on economic
grounds, for example) nor a self-employed worker (who is covered
only by the rights envisaged by his contract). The principal
employment rights afforded by this intermediate status are payment
of the minimum wage (the “national living wage”, set at £ 7.20 per
hour or € 8.08), a right to paid leave of 5.6 weeks per year
(including official public holidays); a right to daily and weekly
rest breaks; a right not to work more than 48 hours per week (unless
they choose to opt out of this right), and protection against
discrimination.
So
the decision will have repercussions for the company’s
costs? Exactly. Its fixed costs are
going to go up as a result of awarding employment rights to the
workers, such as the granting of paid leave. In addition, it is very
likely that these drivers could be regarded as skilled workers,
obliging the company to enrol them in a personal pension scheme and
to contribute between 1% and 3% of their earnings towards it.
Classification as a worker also changes their tax status. A
“flexible” status, such as being self-employed, is normally
preferred by the parties. This allows the employer to avoid having
to pay employer’s contributions and make tax deductions at source.
As for the worker, being self-employed allows him to avoid paying
higher rates of social security contributions.
If
this case law is confirmed, will it affect a large
proportion of people who currently work for a platform along
the lines of Uber? Yes, unquestionably.
It will give drivers an opportunity from now on to persuade Uber to
treat them more favourably by granting them more employment rights.
This ruling is also a real warning to businesses not to rely on
“flexible” contracts to disguise an employment relationship in order
to avoid their legal obligations.
|
|
|
 |
| |
Diary
22 November
Paris
Colloquium organised by DARES entitled “Éclairages
sur la qualité du travail” (Insights into the quality of
employment), presenting research conducted on the basis of the “Working
conditions” survey.
23
November Brussels
Seminar by Confrontations Europe on the “State
of industrial relations in Europe in 2016” (EN),
with David Dion (DG Employment), William Garcia (CEFIC), Delphine
Rudelli and Peter Scherrer (ETUC), following publication of the report on
“Industrial relations in Europe facing the challenges of
employment”.
29
November Berlin
Seminar organised by the European Foundation for the
Improvement of Living and Working Conditions on EU
labour market integration of asylum-seekers and refugees, with
experts from six Member States (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany,
Luxembourg and the Netherlands).
16
December Brussels
Monthly
Forum of the European Trade Union Institute: Occupational Cancer in
Europe.
|
|
|
 |
IR Notes is a fortnightly
newsletter produced by IR Share
and its network of experts, and is available in several
European languages. It offers Europe-wide monitoring of employment law, labour
relations and employment policy. It is available by subscription for 15 euros
per month (excluding tax), via the IR
Share website. IR Share is a privately- owned,
independent, apolitical company whose aim is to inform and assist all players
involved in social dialogue within and outside Europe. It has been the
correspondent organisation for France and Luxembourg of the Dublin Foundation
since 2009 and for Bulgaria since 2014.
|
|
|
Lead
story
The
Commission places the Pillar of Social Rights at the heart of its 2017 work
programme
In October each year the European Commission presents its work programme for the
following twelve months, thereby announcing its intentions. In the field of social
policy, its 2017 programme, which was presented on 25 October in the form of a communication (see press
release), prioritises the presentation, in the first quarter of 2017, of a
proposal for a Pillar of Social Rights, accompanied by “related initiatives”, such
as measures “to address the challenges of work-life balance faced by working
families” and “on access to social protection” (see Annex I
on key initiatives). As part of the Refit programme, which is designed to
improve and simplify European legislation, the Commission intends to begin work on
the revision of directive 91/553 establishing the employer’s obligation to inform
employees in writing of the conditions applicable to their contract or employment
relationship. To this end the Commission must begin by consulting the European
social partners. Changes to European legislation are also afoot with the revision of
directive 96/71 of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the
framework of the provision of services which is one of the “priority pending
proposals” awaiting adoption by the Council and the European Parliament. On the
other hand, a revision of the working time directive is not scheduled (see annex Refit
scoreboard, in English). Following an initial attempt at recasting which
failed owing to a lack of consensus between the Council and Parliament, the
Commission intends to avoid a second setback. It is therefore announcing the simple
publication of a guide to facilitate the implementation of the directive on working
time without going down the legislative route. Furthermore, it makes no mention of
presenting a directive to implement the agreement on health and safety for workers
in the hairdressing sector, an omission denounced by the European trade union
federation UNI Europa (see press
release). On this issue the Commission will receive the evaluation of the
legislation on health and safety at work by the end of the year, but it is not
announcing any revision at this stage, simply a communication that will summarise
the evaluation and propose subsequent initiatives if required. In 2017 the
Commission will continue with its revision programme, giving particular priority to
the social legislation applicable in the road transport industry (directive 2003/59,
regulation No. 561/2006, directive 2002/15 and directive 2006/22) in order to ensure
a level playing field in this sector and adequate working conditions (see Annex
II: Refit initiatives) . It has also announced an evaluation of the
directives on fixed-term work and part-time work. The Commission says it will
continue its consideration of a “consolidation/recast” of the three directives
covering information and consultation rights in conjunction with the request of the
European social partners in the sector of central government administrations to
transform their European agreement on this subject signed in December 2015 into a
directive. It does not mention the evaluation of the directive on European works
councils in its programme, although this has been concluded.
|
1. European
Union
Social
update
Resolution on corporate responsi-bility for
respecting human rights: The European Parliament on 25
October adopted, with a significant majority (569 votes for, 54 against, 74
abstentions) a resolution
on corporate responsibility for serious human rights abuses in third
countries. The MEPs believe that, “if companies are found to have caused or
contributed to harm, they should take moral but also legal responsibility and must
provide for or participate in effective remedy processes for the individuals and
communities affected”. They welcome “the practice of incorporating responsibility
for respecting human rights into binding contractual requirements between companies
and their corporate and private clients and suppliers”. They recall that “states,
acting within their jurisdiction, have a duty to protect human rights, including
against abuses committed by companies, even if they operate in third countries”
(also see EurActiv
article).
- Trade union reaction to the 2017 work
programme of the European Commission: The European Trade
Union Confederation (ETUC) expressed its position on the Commission work
programme in a press
release. While it emphasises a number of positive points, it is
“dismayed by the absence of any reference to workers’ representation on boards,
European works councils, protecting workers’ health and safety”. The ETUC is
also “disappointed” that the Commission “has ignored the repeated request of
employers and trade unions for the development of an ambitious industrial policy
to be included in the work programme”. The European trade union federation UNI
Europa (see press
release) for its part denounced the absence of any mention in the work
programme of adopting a directive to implement the agreement on health and
safety at work concluded by the social partners in the hairdressing sector.
- European Commission aims to close the
gender pay gap: On 3 November, European Equal Pay Day,
the Commission stated that it will come forward with a proposal for working
families in 2017 now that consultations with the social partners are closed. Its
objective will be to allow “not only (…) working parents and carers to find
the right balance between their private and professional life”, but also to
“increase women’s participation in the labour market”. The Commission indicates
that “more equality in the uptake and choice in leave schemes is needed, as well
as flexible working arrangements and more affordable childcare” (see press
release).
|
Trade
unions
- A guide for European works councils in the
audiovisual industry: The European trade union
federation UNI Europa has unveiled a guide
for European works councils in audiovisual media companies based on the results
of a European project funded by the European Commission (see press
release).
|
2. Member
states
Belgium
Annualisation of working hours and donation of
leave days. The government approved a bill, on 28 October,
that modify some aspects of social legislation (see press
release). The bill is subject to consultation before following the
conventional legislative procedure. In particular, it will be possible for work time
to be annualised at company or sectoral level by way of a collective labour
agreement or an amendment to the workplace regulation. At present, flexibility of
working hours is allowed only for a period of three months. Another provision allows
for the donation of leave days. A parent with a sick child who has exhausted all the
available leave options can ask their employer to activate the system. The employer
then informs his staff. Only days not included in the twenty statutory leave days
can be considered for a donation. The donation is anonymous and must be provided for
by a collective labour agreement or a clause in the (internal) workplace regulation.
- Reformed mechanism for
sectoral wage increases: On 28 October
the government approved a bill, amending a 1996 act, that provides for the
social partners every two years to agree the overall margin of wage increases
(disregarding automatic indexation) that can be negotiated in the sectors. This
serves as a ceiling not to be exceeded in wage negotiations (see press
release). The trade union confederation FGTB sees in these measures an
“institutionalisation of pay restraint” (see press
release). For the employers’ organisation FEB, the bill will allow the
differences in labour costs compared to Belgium’s neighbouring countries to be
resorbed and “any new wage cost overruns arising in the future to be avoided
and/or corrected more quickly ” (see press
release).
|
France
- A practical guide to faith in the
workplace: The Ministry of Labour on 7 November
presented a practical guide (see non-final
version on the IR Share website) to religious faith in private
companies for the use of employees and employers. The document “recalls
existing law and presents several practical cases to permit a concrete
response to questions that may arise within companies” (see press
release). In an opinion
issued in 2013, the Economic, Environmental and Social Committee had
recommended such a publication. The trade union confederation CFDT published
its own guide
in 2015.
|
Hungary
- Conciliation service for collective labour
relations: As part of a European project funded for
three years by the European Union, the Hungarian social partners have set up a
free service to resolve legal disputes concerning collective labour relations.
The members of the service are experts in employment law chosen by the social
partners. They can give advice, act as conciliators or mediators, or assist with
certain arbitration cases.
|
Luxembourg
- Increase in minimum wage:
The Luxembourg cabinet on 14 October adopted a bill aimed at increasing the
social minimum wage by 1.4% on 1 January 2017, thereby adjusting the social
minimum wage rates in line with the rise in average earnings in 2014 and 2015.
|
Romania
- New official public holiday:
The Labour Code was modified by law No. 176 of 7 October
2016 to add an extra public holiday – 24 January – to mark the union of the
two principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia (“Small Romania”).
- Buying back pension contributions:
Law No. 186 of 24 October 2016 allows people who do not
satisfy the cumulative conditions for a retirement pension to backdate
payment contributions so that they qualify. The backdated payment is limited
to five years, and the only beneficiaries of the law will be people who have
not been insured under the public retirement pension scheme for this 5-year
period (that is to say who have not received employment income). As a
result, they have not been legally obliged to pay contributions for this
type of insurance. The backdated amount may be paid in a lump sum or in
several monthly instalments.
|
United
Kingdom
Uber’s drivers adjudged to be
employees: The London Employment Tribunal on 28 October
ruled that Uber drivers could not be considered to be self-employed workers but
were to be regarded as employees, thus opening up a right to the minimum wage,
to rest periods and to paid leave (see the text
of the ruling and press release
of the GMB union which brought the case). The judgement could allow a certain
number of drivers among the 40,000 operating in the United Kingdom, especially
those who work exclusively for Uber, to be recognised as having the status of
employees. A ruling on a similar case is expected during November for City
Sprint couriers. These decisions will be closely examined by all businesses
whose model is based on platforms which connect customers with persons
performing a service in return for payment.
|
3.
Companies
European
works councils
Verallia: An agreement
establishing a European works council at the world’s third-largest glass packaging
company, Verallia (close on 6,000 employees in the EU), was signed on 23 September
by the social partners at this former division of the French Saint-Gobain group,
which was sold in October 2015 to the American investment fund Apollo. The European
works council has at least one representative per country and additional seats
according to the number of employees, without an upper limit being set. “The number
of members can therefore be increased if companies are acquired within the EU,”
explains Dominique Spinali (CGT), who chaired the special negotiating body. The
agreement (which we cannot yet add to our IR Share database) provides for a select
committee of five members to be set up, which will allow a social dialogue to be
maintained at regular intervals with management. It will ensure “EWC rights to
information and consultation between annual meetings”. It will therefore be
consulted in case of exceptional circumstances, and its composition can be enlarged
so that EWC members are included in the process as appropriate, depending on which
sites are likely to be affected. The select committee can decide to call upon the
services of an expert and also has a budget of € 30,000 per year for an annual
expert report. In the event of consultation, the committee must deliver its opinion
at the end of the meeting.
- Marazzi Group: The annual
meeting of the EWC of the Marazzi Group, a multinational leader in the ceramic
tiles sector founded in 1935 and controlled by Mohawk Industries Inc., took
place on 27-28 October in Sassuolo (near Modena, Italy). The programme on 27
October was devoted to marking the 20th anniversary of the EWC’s creation. The
aim was to strengthen the EWC’s role and, with support from SindNova, to train
the new council members.
|
Company-level agreement
Total: Pursuant to the law
of 17 August 2015 concerning the Energy Transition for Green Growth, which was
amended by the supplementary budget act for 2015, the management of the French
energy group Total, together with four trade unions, on 26 September signed an
agreement
that creates a kilometre allowance for employees travelling between their
homes and workplace by bicycle. Supplementing a previous agreement
signed in 2012 that already provided for reimbursement of 60% of the cost of a
public bicycle hire service, the new text sets the cycling kilometre allowance
at 25 euro cents per km, as envisaged by the legislation, up to a ceiling of
€ 200 per year.
|
4. Studies
and reports
Declining industry the European
Union: Amid mounting calls for a proper European
industrial policy from both employers’ organisations and trade unions, a study
published by Eurostat again underscores the decline in industry at EU level.
Thus, while in 2015 industry was still the largest economic activity in the EU
in terms of output generated, accounting for 19.3% of EU total gross value
added, the industrial sector also experienced the most marked decline. The share
of industry in gross value added fell by 4 pp (percentage points) between 1995
and 2015. The trend has been seen in the vast majority of member states, with
the largest falls being registered in Malta (- 11.7 pp), Latvia and the United
Kingdom (both – 8.9 pp), Finland (- 8.2 pp), Luxembourg (- 7.8 pp) and Belgium
(- 7 pp). The share accounted for by industry increased only in Ireland (+ 12.9
pp), followed at a distance by Hungary (+ 2.4 pp), Bulgaria (+ 2.3 pp) and the
Czech Republic (+ 0.7 pp). Likewise, industry’s share in EU employment fell from
20.9% in 1995 to 15.4% in 2015.
|
|
|